quantim
md5: 1d31734c38f8202d1d5d4fd5f8285d56
🔍
You have 3 years give or take until quantum computing completely destroys the internet and everything you know
>HTTPS, SSH, and basically the entire internet would cease to be secure
>Global financial collapse as encrypted banking transactions and digital currencies are instantly compromised
>Crypto instantly worthless as all wallets can instantly be cracked
>Government and military secrets would be exposed
>Years of stored, encrypted data would result in billions of emails, texts, could all suddenly be decrypted
D-Day is coming. You are not ready. The world is not ready.
It might literally bring on the end of civilisation. Humanity has placed all their eggs in one basket. computers and the internet, both dependant on encryption
>GUYS IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD BECAUSE SOMETHING SOMETHING QUANTUM
What ecleb cancer has released a video this time?
>>105939970Cope. Civilizational collapse is incoming.
its genuinely over. quantum proof encryption is a meme
hello i hate oxford instruments they should be banned from touching computers goodbye
>>105939947 (OP)I don't see an issue with any of that.
okay but only labs have those
>>105939947 (OP)>ML-KEM (Module Lattice Key Encapsulation Mechanism) is an encryption scheme officially standardized by NIST under FIPS 203. It is designed to provide a secure key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) that is resistant to attacks from both classical and quantum computers. /g/ cant be cracked by quantum computers. even if suddenly tommorow they got a billion times faster. hell quantum computers will take decades to be fast enough to crack even non-quantum-hardened stuff and we already have quantum hardened encryption everywhere.
press F12 on any webpage and go to the security tab, see for yourself
>>105939947 (OP)>You have 3 yearsMight you be a time traveler?
>>105941362aes-128 is more than secure enough for centuries/millenia from now
>>105939947 (OP)I'm pretty sure pqc is already merged into OpenSSL (if not it's like months away at most) and quantum hasn't even broken RSA.
>>105940030Falcon was pretty good last I checked.
>>105939947 (OP)Lol look at that thing. People are getting duped by that?
>>105941510more than enough
people like you will create TAES eventually
>>105939947 (OP)Said this to my accountant. He was lamenting not investing in btc early even though he had dozens of clients that told him to toss a few grand in early on. I told him if he's going to do it nows the time because the existential threat to all crypto is quantum computing. I said once that happens all those old wallets get busted open and that btc floods back into the market and sloshed around and destroys it
>>105941672This is a complete misunderstanding of how that would work on multiple levels.
>>105941703t. wants the whole internet to run in AES-32768
>>105941731We're probably near the top for the current cycle but I would buy at least a little if you don't have *any.*
>>105941672>>105941731the real play is to wait for some massive quantum computing FUD causing a massive crypto dump and buying all those coins cheap
bitcoin runs on SHA256 aint nothing cracking that
>>105939947 (OP)Why do people care about this again?
you have to be the government to have access to these things. if you already have back doors into all of it, why would adding another way to do it to your toolbox make everything implode?
Surely all doomers around this understand the field and can accurately judge developments to create a realistic timeline, suuuurely, you all know exactly how quantum computing restrictions are being worked around, you don't just vaguely remember something with infinite states that could be super duper heckin fast, suuurely this isn't a psyop, people in the field totally believe quantum will crack all encryption
>>105939947 (OP)I dont understand. If quantum computers can break modern encryption, couldn't it be solved with just using an encryption with a massive amount of bits so the problem space is unrealistically too large for anything to solve?
>>105939947 (OP)i will tell you a secret, it is all a scam, like agi or string theory, many people are getting rich off these lies, which is why the whole charade continues
>>105941731Problem is morons get rich every day. And one of this guy's clients is indeed a moron. He files his taxes every year but doesn't actually pay them. Says his crypto gains out pace the interest and fees the irs charges. He's several years behind compounding interest at a 5-9% variable rate. Interest on top of the penalties and fees
the gubmint already has quantum ai
it's already too late
>>105942172>He's several years behind compounding interest at a 5-9%If you can find risk free 5-9% APY you could carry trade a HELOC.
>>105942155Fuck, man, its basic supply and demand. A 12 year old can figure it out.
what the heck is that weird device I'm looking at?
>>105939947 (OP)quantum computing is such a stupid name
it's actually bruteforce computing, the qubits are bruteforce bits
>>105939947 (OP)What are the use cases for going quantum other than ruining everything for everyone? Why is it being pursued for if it's so bad?
>>105944154the same as AI, or nukes, its kike things
>>105944154>If we don't do it, they will and we'll be left severely disadvantaged When all sides think like that, there's no choice but to continue to push for potentially cataclysmic technology
this thread is giving me anxiety
>>105939947 (OP)nothing will happen, they'll just replace old encryption algorithms
>>105939947 (OP)>exactly how quantum computing restrictions are being worked around, you don't just vaguely remember something with infinite states that could be super duper heckin fast, suuurely this isn'tOk, but what will this do to gayming?
>>105939947 (OP)>The internet won't be secureI thought you fags yearned for net 1.0?
candle
md5: 689910563d7820651c6de6d9ec382003
🔍
I'm ready to go back to typewriters, letterwriting, candlelight, and handcranked 78 record players
>>105939947 (OP)Good. Data should be free. All that shit is already compromised and decrypted multiple times in-route and copied. You're deluding yourself if you think the state would allow you to have real encryption.
>>105939947 (OP)You goddamn ape. You think ((they)) will announce openly that encryption is dead? No, they will bribe/remove those who made a working machine, install it in Pentagon or somewhere in Tel Aviv and snoop on the entire world.
>>105941769Btc.d still has to dump, buy altcoins now anons
>>105939947 (OP)The government already has backdoors to everything it wants to, and already keeps tabs on everyone it wants to. Quantum computing would only be catastrophic if it was something consumers could buy and use, which it won't be due to the price and complexity. Its availability will settle into the same position as nuclear weapons and enriched uranium, and it will be fiercely protected by select countries as such.
So, not really a big deal.
>>105939947 (OP)the resources do not exist for quantum encryption cracking to be done at any kind of scale
absolute nothingburger
>>105939947 (OP)Basically all important encrypted systems have already been updated to quantum-resistant algorithms.
>>105948731Lmao you cant be this naive. Quantum proof encryption is a meme that has barely been introduced anywhere
>>105948751You are technologically illiterate and should probably keep lurking rather than make threads and expose yourself for the cretin that you are.
>>105941769Nice try but I don't gamble
It's never been more over
Sneakers was a fun movie.
file
md5: 88fb5ec7cbb0c4edadad502d4ef66ebe
🔍
what's the use case for these loops?
>>105949912Thermal expansion/contraction
-t. FRIDGE JOCKEY
>>105939947 (OP)We already have quantum secure encryption, we'll just switch to that once there is a point.
Post quantum cryptography will be widely implemented before we have reliable quantum computers that can crack public key cryptography
