>>105942160 (OP)youtube bans the types of homemade content that was popular in the early days
not outright, but their algorithm scans the video for any "negative" speech or themes and nothing thats even slightly "negative" let alone edgy gets recommended to anyone
sure, some of it can stay up, but nobody sees it, it will never make it onto anyones recommended
basically, no interesting content allowed
the only things allowed on youtube are NPR type libtarded video essays and explainers, boring as shit politically neutral videos, old archival footage (must be neutral/wholesome), or Mr beast style third world content farm slop
pretty much everything that went viral in the "golden age" was edgy or dirty in some way that wouldnt be allowed today, the picrel in the OP is a prime example
btw, if you dont believe me about youtube censoring *negativity* (NOT politics mind you), just try replying to something calling it dumb
you'll be able to reply, but it immediately becomes invisible to anyone but you and you can verify this by looking for the comment in an incognito tab
the same thing happens with videos