I love arch linux lol
it's so insanely based it makes my eyes roll back

>>105948244 (OP)
I've been using Fedora for half a year and I'm really happy with it. Any big reason to switch to arch as an average pc user other than the aur?

>>105948244 (OP)
>archlinux
>aur
>each update requires manual intervention, recompile, pkgbuild editing, etc
>normal arch repos
>some updates require manual intervention

>gentoo
>"User Action Required" after update

>fedora
>it updates itself, no need to do systems programming because of updates
I think I'm gonna stay with fedora KDE

>>105948922
>aur
>glorified packaging hub where for some reason having the program isn't enough so you also have to package it even though it works just fine without packaging it
>bloats system with aur package dependencies
>"OOHHH, I'M PACKAGIIIINGGG"
there's no reason

>>105949074
Doesn't Chaotic AUR have precompiled software?

>>105949154
idk, been a long time since I last used arch. also I never used that repo so idk.

a tip that I would give is to edit /etc/makepkg.conf to optimize compilation flags

>>105948244 (OP)
>jizzraeli idf keeps pushing for arch on /g/
must mean they can't c0-op it

windows gibs more power for 9070 than arch

>>105949133
congrats, you've never had to install a program that makes you chase down its dependencies.

>>105948922
>Any big reason to switch to arch as an average pc user other than the aur?
not being a red hat slave is a good reason

agreed
its the default linux distro
i'm trying to convert /hsg/ to understand this
it's a perfect server distro
i don't want to hear from wincels who think stability only comes from a gay LTS label

>>105949930
i should add i avoid the aur totally.

>>105949942
The AUR isn't that bad actually, but you gotta use a helper or you will have a gorillion dependencies that are impossible to track manually.