Is she correct?

>>105956839 (OP)
not technology she's correct that you need to stay in your containment board >>>/r9k/

Yes. Most women scream that it needs to be banned and it's misogynistic but she's just saying it filters out losers for her.

>>105956852
>AI isnt technology
Brain damage

no she's not. the world will be dramatically different in only a few years, the social landscape wont even be recognizable

>>105956839 (OP)
Incels and femcels have different ideologies but the exact same beliefs. If it was a chud saying "It's SO OVER for guys who date AI" you'd agree with him wouldn't you?

>>105956839 (OP)
Women who are 30 and unmarried are pathetic. I'm not sorry.

How do you even date an AI? I mean if you use it to jack off that's fine but I see no other use.

>>105958183
no, it never began for anyone who has ever opened the aicg thread

>>105956839 (OP)
Yes because dating real women is better and cheaper.

>blue check mark
whoever owns that account is male and likely posting from a shack in bangalore

>>105956879
Random twitter roastie opinions on technology users are not technology. Twitter posters should be banned on sight.

>Use case for real women?