>>105959014 (OP)>no telemetry and bloat unlike modern WindowsWhile Windows XP does not have the extensive telemetry features found in modern Windows versions (like Windows 10 and 11), it does have some level of data collection, particularly through its activation and update processes. Additionally, many users consider Windows XP to have bloatware in the form of pre-installed applications and services that can consume system resources.
>user friendly unlike LinuxUser-friendliness is subjective and can vary based on the user's experience and familiarity with the operating system. Many modern Linux distributions (like Ubuntu or Mint) have made significant strides in usability, often providing a more intuitive experience for new users compared to Windows XP, which is outdated and lacks support for modern hardware and software standards.
>light on system resourcesWhile Windows XP was designed to run on older hardware, it is not necessarily "light" in terms of resource usage when compared to some modern lightweight Linux distributions. Many Linux distros are specifically designed to be resource-efficient and can run on minimal hardware, often using fewer resources than Windows XP itself.
>runs just about all software made between 1990 and 2020Windows XP cannot run many modern applications and software that require newer versions of Windows due to compatibility issues, lack of support for modern APIs, and security vulnerabilities. Software developed after the mainstream support for Windows XP ended in 2014 often does not support this operating system, limiting its ability to run applications from the later part of that time frame.
Just install Slitaz or Tiny Core with Librewolf (uBlock Origin included as default) and Violentmonkey. Or Linux Mint.