Intel operated at 19Bn loss last year.
Why aren't amd chips taking over laptops yet?

>>105961300 (OP)
Probably too hot.

>>105961300 (OP)
Because OEMs tend to pick intel for their processors, and people who buy labtobs don't have much of a say when buying them.

>>105961300 (OP)
Because of mossad blackmail

>>105961300 (OP)
M-Chips are ahead

>>105961323
Why would OEMs go for a company operating at such a loss?
I understand America/israel lobby has safeteynet for intel but the money flow doesn't look very good.

>>105961349
>Why would OEMs go for a company operating at such a loss?
Long term contracts, bulk discounts, the CEOs railing each other's wives, etc.
I know for sure Dell barely even looks at AMD for their stuff.

>>105961300 (OP)
AMD is a known to be a unrealiable supplier for laptop chips and the latest Lunar Lake CPU are genuinely good.

they will keep reporting imaginary losses until regulators allow Intel to be broken up and sold in pieces
and it'd be a disaster for tech
Uncle Pat was right about everything

>>105961349
Intel is selling those laptop CPUs for rather cheap in bulk deals; having to sell their stuff for cheap is a big part of why Intel is losing money.

>Why aren't amd chips taking over laptops yet?
Path dependency

AMD is a fed honeypot, use intel instead

Nothing ever happens
Basically for something to happen, a lot of things need to happen in a short period of time, which never happens because nothing ever happens.

>>105961349
>Why would OEMs go for a company operating at such a loss?
Your mom keeps getting into debt but people still buy sex from her. Why would they do this?

>>105961300 (OP)
Because normies only see 2 sides, and that is max or windows. and 2025 will be the year of mac os

>>105962067
>IME/PSP runs below Ring 0 (higher privilege than the kernel, BIOS, hypervisor)
>hard drives and network hardware confirmed (((NSA))) backdoored since Snowden
>Lebanese pagers
>AI knows your passwords from hearing the keys click when you type them (see: "A Practical Deep Learning-Based Acoustic Side-Channel Attack on Keyboards")
>every linuxfag here is on 50 watchlists
>you have zero privacy or security if you use computers for anything
Welcome to the future

>>105961300 (OP)
AMD has supply chain issues. Intel can churn out old sloppa faster and more efficiently.

>>105961349
do you look at each company that makes your groceries and only buy from profitable ones?

No, so why would laptop makers?