How do we make software pure again?

>>105963036 (OP)
Make hardware crap again.

>>105963036 (OP)
retard millenials will literally look at these and go """v..vgh..VGHHH S..S.SOVLLLLLL AAaaAAAA SOVLLL KINO COMFY SOVLLLL"

Start. Fvcking. Latinas.

work on serenity os

>>105963036 (OP)
Nuke India. Then blame it on Pakistan.

>>105963102
They're right in this one doe.

>>105963053

>>105963102
Yes.

>>105963102
this but sincerely and without crippling irony poisoning

>>105963036 (OP)
>single color
>monochrome
>flat
I hate Windows 95, 98, ME, 2000 etc. so much. Fucking flat single color monochrome trash.

>>105964684
it was designed to look good with only 16 colours, anon. also it's not flat, the buttons and edges all have black/white lines designed to give elements a 3D look. just look at >>105963193 and compare it to something like google's material design, you can see the buttons appear 'raised' and the black/white lines swap sides when you press a button so they appear to get pressed. not like now where you have to just guess what is an isn't a button

>>105963102
retarded zoomzoom will literally eat tidepods and go "NOM NON NOM NOM NOM"

>>105964684
>Monochrome
Literally every element is recolorable.

>>105965551
No it's not.

>>105964684
yet still more options for colours than current windows

>>105965626
Ok then enable dark mode on it.

I'm waiting.

>>105965642
one of the built in themes is literally an inverted/dark theme. it's also ugly because it's meant to be a "high contrast" theme, but you can like the other said adjust all of these elements yourself. you can indeed make a dark theme with light text, using only provided tools

>>105964684
You may not like it, but this is what peak GUI looks like.

>>105965735
Based
Supermium is planning to add support for Win 2000

>>105965735
It's just the nostalgic aesthetic that makes it 'peak'

>>105965803
You only say that because you're a contrarian zoomer, who, ironically, probably adores fruity nigger aero, because that's what he saw on PCs as a kid. I don't remember anyone actually liking the aesthetic overhaul when XP came out.

>>105965835
XP isn't fruity though.
With that said i agree, I dont either recall anyone saying the default playdough/luna theme in windows xp looked good. I always made sure to switch to classic whenever i reinstalled my pc.

>>105963036 (OP)
Get rid of OOP and go back to pure functions.

>>105963036 (OP)
I really like this image.

ITT: Zoomers LARPing as Millennials

>>105963036 (OP)
By making culture pure again. Seems a lost cause at this point thoughever.

>>105965835
My desktop looks nothing like winbloat nor aero

>>105963193
>Microsoft was already begging you to use their shitty browser back in 1995
Some things never change I guess

>>105965626
Bottom right for me

>>105966233
Windows explorer is not internet explorer.
Windows explorer did not become Windows-explorer-but-actually-ie-running-under-the-hood until IE4+Shell update

>>105966233
the first release of windows 95 didn't come with IE, actually, only later ones did (you can instantly tell which you have because it says it on the actual boot screen)

>>105966268
oh is that what he was referring to? yes, the original explorer wasn't IE-based, it's also easy to tell them apart

>>105966311
(also, THAT'S RIGHT! explorer has been using a web browser engine since before windows 98 came out! it's not a win11 thing!)

>>105963036 (OP)
>How do we make software pure again?
Unironically: build a wall.