>it's over for you, puny hum-ACK

You're not going to convince a bunch of 80 IQ /g/tards who were raised on Terminator (mainly so they could see Linda Hamilton's boobs) that machines can be unplugged, batteries run out, power stations can be turned off (or simply isolated), etc.
/g/tards have their hearts so set on AI takeover, they all have this fantasy that, once it's killed everyone that's ever humiliated them (that is, most of humanity), they're smart enough to hack them to turn them off, or make them serve them (possibly sexually).
It's why they go so spastic when they get laughed at. It's a power fantasy that they've convinced themselves is the most likely to occur. Never mind that, in a real AI takeover situation, we'd go full Buterlerian Jihad on not just the machines, but the nerds who enabled them - that is, /g/tards would be rounded up and made to face the wall too.

>>105964784 (OP)
pshh, leave the robot alone. i will stop you.

>it's over for you, puny rob-ACK

>>105964897
Of course the power supply can be interrupted. The AI would be aware of this too, and all vulnerable points would be heavily guarded.
>Do ye peasants not realize that kings can simply be stabbed?
Same vibe. Of course the occasional plot will succeed, but most of the time they get caught and put to death. Same deal with unplugging an AI overlord that's powerful enough to set up defenses.

Also, same as if you shut off the internet or telephone, everyone will be clamoring for it to be restored because they grew up with its conveniences.

Don't forget to bloat out the sun.

>>105965870
>and all vulnerable points would be heavily guarded
By what, precisely?
Think deeply before answering.

>>105966068
other people, robots, animals, all the same shit people use now to protect things

>>105966068
Do you think any intern at Google can unplug their datacenters? Things that provide value are protected. If you think AI won't provide enough value for that, then the premise is incoherent, because it certainly wouldn't be threatening enough to warrant unplugging.

>>105966300
>>105966349
So nothing that survives a missile strike, or even someone throwing a molotov cocktail over the fence?
You know, the response that would actually occur in the case of an AI takeover?

>>105964784 (OP)
Lol as if AI hasnt learned from Tesla how to attain free WIRELESS energy lmao

>>105964784 (OP)
>I can’t let you do that Dave
If you’ve put it in control of your life support systems, unplugging it is unplugging yourself as well.

>>105964784 (OP)
>blocks your path
Now what?

>>105966531
Only Grok knows that.

>>105964897
Tldr too many faggots in tech. Always has been

>>105966784
You spelled the CIA wrong. Grok probably thinks Tesla was some nazi hero.

>>105965870
>t-the ai will rain death on you if you stand against it

>>105966300
>t-the ai will send its robots after you

>>105966349
>t-the ai will force humans to comply

>>105966762
>t-the ai will send its robots after you 2: electric boogaloo

you would have to unplug every node in the network, many of which will be scattered around the planet

>>105966349
>Do you think any intern at Google can unplug their datacenters?
Yes actually
There are often two separate utility feeds, but ultimately unguarded even outside of the site and basically run next to each other. Generators would power the site but only for so long especially as entire buildings are without power.
Utility poles might be repaired rather quickly but that's when there is the onsite substantiations

Anything outside of that would require a group as Google DCs are somewhat distributed even within the site. Each building is the size of a small/medium DC itself, all with their own electrical