Stop blaming Rust for GPL's loss of popularity. It has been dying before Rust.

post the chart

>>105964882

>>105965074
People are retards.

>>105965074
GPL bros.. I'm not feeling very good

blessingbros, where do we stand on this

>>105965464
line 11 requires "NIGGER" somewhere, it's called the "NIGGER blessing" license, since we are, in fact, blessed by niggers (hardship).

>>105965074
is this github-only? because that would be neither comprehensive, nor random sampling.
i'm not saying the general trend isn't there. i'm just pointing out that this chart might not be providing what's assumed to be a conclusive answer.
>t. writes AGPL and MPLv2 Rust code

>>105964795 (OP)
The MIT license being popular with the 50 SLOC Node.js microdep crowd isn't an argument. Especially when they have a user base of 1 and licensed it that way because it's slop you could re-implement yourself in 3 minutes.

>>105965074
No show the one that's weighted by active users.

>>105964795 (OP)
MIT is just better. Nobody wants to deal with HIV+Cuck licensed trannyware.

>>105965179
>>105965408
>>105966966
>>105967345
>g sucking at reading graphs
never change, g

clarif:
gpl based licences have kept the same proportion if not increased compared to the rest of the market

>>105964795 (OP)
plz put funny caption on picture

>>105967507

>>105967482
>g sucking at reading graphs
Explain.

>>105967559
actually i take that back
gpl v2+v3 went from 18% to 14
and lgpl got assraped
when mit went from ~30 to ~42%