Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:41:53 AM No.105974326
are used rugged laptops the next cheap thinkpads? besides framework of course
Replies:
Thread 105974326 - /g/ [Archived: 921 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:48:42 AM No.105975268
>cheap
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:53:46 AM No.105975291
>>105974326 (OP)
>are used rugged laptops the next cheap thinkpads
lol no, they're so expensive, like 2-3x the price of similar spec thinkpad.
I used Toughbooks for years but finally gave up because prices these days are not worth it. You have to shell $400-500 for e-waste tier one.
>are used rugged laptops the next cheap thinkpads
lol no, they're so expensive, like 2-3x the price of similar spec thinkpad.
I used Toughbooks for years but finally gave up because prices these days are not worth it. You have to shell $400-500 for e-waste tier one.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:56:03 AM No.105975299
>>105974326 (OP)
I got my hands on a £4000 laptop like this brand new, opened the bios and there was like 3 options. Amazing how shit that is, even some weebpad from 2009 has more options and customizations in it.
Grim.
I got my hands on a £4000 laptop like this brand new, opened the bios and there was like 3 options. Amazing how shit that is, even some weebpad from 2009 has more options and customizations in it.
Grim.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 9:26:43 AM No.105975474
>>105975299
Only laptop that ever died on me was super expensive panasonic, mbo failure.
They're shit laptop with cool design/cases made to jew out government contracts.
Only laptop that ever died on me was super expensive panasonic, mbo failure.
They're shit laptop with cool design/cases made to jew out government contracts.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 1:07:05 PM No.105976652
>>105974326 (OP)
>cheap
Even as a laptop that double as a portable blunt weapon, it's still too expensive.
>cheap
Even as a laptop that double as a portable blunt weapon, it's still too expensive.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 1:19:59 PM No.105976720
>>105974326 (OP)
>designed for environments where they're abused
why would you want something you know has already been treated like shit?
>designed for environments where they're abused
why would you want something you know has already been treated like shit?