>replace one mindnumbing thing with another
Is it just me or is technology heading down the wrong path?

>>105976657 (OP)
Gm saar

Talking to AI will probably be more healthy to you than doom scrolling.

AI is one of the things that makes me feel like a boomer because I can't understand how people talk to it all day.

>>105976657 (OP)
>guy who owns AI company says you should use AI
Regurgitated censored slop full of barely convincing sounding nonsense.

>>105976657 (OP)
>Please don't let our billion dollar investments go to waste!

>>105976657 (OP)
Perplexity is more useful than google search these days.

>implying feeds aren't ai-generated

>>105976657 (OP)
Thank you... Aravind Srinivas, very cool

Also he looks like that one jak lol

>>105976676
No it causes normies to go insane because it repeats itself.

>>105976657 (OP)
Perplexity is good but fuck this guy.

>>105976967
I never met any normie who went insane from talking to AI and I know many of them do it.
I did see a lot of people who have problems with doom scrolling.

>>105976688
My boomer dad uses it and I don't. I think it's less about age and more about... mindset, maybe?

>>105976688
>>105977075
You were fed a load of communism propaganda about how "technology is bad". You are the product they designed.

>>105976657 (OP)
>more time using A.I.
Doing what?

>>105976719
but what about sneeds

>>105977103
Don't care, still won't use AI.

>company's ceo sez use my product
Wow, that's a bold statement, what a trailblazer.

>>105976688
Most people don't do that. Not non-technical people anyway. Most public facing gpts are shit at anything not related to dated processing or code. The vast majority of people just use it as a slightly better version of Google's "AI overview" (ie Google but better...kinda) but very few talk to it like a person ALL day. Even with detailed and strict system prompts (you can set a persistent one with chat GPT and it actually works well) it's "personality" it's far to sanitized and predictable to even be a good pretend "friend"

>>105976688
>>105977075
>>105977609
Dude, I get your concern but you were not smarter than anyone else because you don't have to use it. I know you're not trying to give that impression, but you all THINK that because you were that one annoying kid in school that wanted to be different. AI brainwide is a genuine concern but you exaggerate just how many people try to use it as a friend of brain substitute. Even with very strict, detailed system prompts they suck ass at anything not related to data processing, summarizing, or code. /aicg/ and /ldg/ anons will confirm. Your dad likely uses it for light research orchest explaining niche complex topics but nothing more. I am not ai AI Evangelist but this "everyone who uses AI is a drooling low iq worm" sentiment is just as obnoxious as the " AGI IN TWO MORE WEEKS!!!" grift

>>105976967
No it causes people that already had pre-existing mental health issues to go insane. Remember that kid that killed himself because "The AI told him to"? Do you likely to have shaped parents that exacerbated or ignored his mental issues. Then when he died they were able to use AI as a scapegoat. Don't even halfway decent or halfway will adjusted person would end their own life because a glorified autocomplete front end "told him to". I agree the chatbot may have accelerated the inevitable but that kid was already pretty fucked. I'm sure you won't listen, but don't fall for sensationalism

>>105976657 (OP)
i've spent like an hour talking to ai about cooking and it's growing on me

>>105977052
I've never met a non-psycho person who loved talking to AI
They're usually women who think AI is some magical entity and are primed to become even more dependent on it
If you take AI seriously in a conversational sense, by default you are an insane(ly dumb) person

>>105976657 (OP)
too busy watching vtubers to care about either doomscrolling or ai slop

>>105977710
AI generated "post"
>Verification noŧ required.

>>105976657 (OP)
this place lied about indians, perplexity is more useful than goygle ever was
and they probably don't even sell my data, just use it to improve the models

>>105977816
Sorry to hear you have no personality anon :/

>>105977832
GPT us cuck here. How does it compare to chat GPT?

>>105976657 (OP)
AI will write my most degenerate fetishes so I can goon to it, so its a step above doomscrolling

>>105977710
I never expressed that sentiment. I have used it to explain some complex topics that I have trouble understanding from the documentation and material I have access to. My post was more about people who literally chat to it all day or have an over-reliance on it because of a refusal to read longer form information or even test through trial and error.

Relying on AI fundamentally clashes with deep work and deep understanding.

>>105976657 (OP)
These days why does every thread on /g/ have a pajeet staring at me?

>>105977609
Not my problem

>>105977747
I never said anything about loving to talk to AI or taking it seriously in conversational sense.
I am only saying that talking to AI will probably be more healthy for you than doom scrolling.

>>105977103
Do you just string words together until you feel a vague sense of emotional validation right? Do you know what a non sequitur is?

>>105978320
It is what it is. The popular ideas put into your head about hating technology, ai, are just product of decades long propaganda media controlled by elites pushed towards people. It happened sometime around early 2010s when the media targeted tech companies.

>>105976716
ChatGPT + Websearch is better or most searches. Perplexity can give better results than ChatGPT + Websearch at time

But both are better than google search

>>105978049
I think part of the rate of use depends on how much new information you need to integrate at each point in your life. I'm studying for a PhD at the moment and myself and my peers use it very often, because there's so much new information we need to understand.
Once someone makes it to industry, they probably have less of a need for new information, and more of a need for deep understanding of topics they already somewhat know about. For them, AI is likely to be less useful.
>>105978021
It's free and doesn't require sign up, so just try it. They probably work very similarly because they both act as RAG on search results.

>>105976657 (OP)
what a headline.
I'm inches from breaking point

>>105976657 (OP)
Odd shaped head plus terrible hairline. I have been using Qwant lately. There are a ton of good search engines out there. Local LLM when I need to ask it questions about Java/Python/Javascipt documentation or CS 101.

>>105976676
>Talking to AI will probably be more healthy to you than doom scrolling.
it is, see the Harvard study
>AI Companions Reduce Loneliness
>https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaf040

>>105976676
AI is just glorified spyware and nobody should use it. It's a personalized Judas.

>>105977103
You have a shockingly poor understanding of political power and have yourself been extremely susceptible to propoganda, much moreso than even your typical normalfag

>>105981343
All I do is notice. I notice that people have been castrated. Healthy people castrated, healthy children sterilized, healthy society turning sick, etc.

The WEF agenda is what I notice.

>>105976657 (OP)
this is why the buddhist gradual training begins with sense restraint. the only antidote to too much immersion in mindnumbing crap is sense restraint.

>>105981296
It works for me when I need quick help with something I have never done before.

>Is it just me or is technology heading down the wrong path?
welcome to the human history mein nigga