I fucking hate how putting your real name and phone number on the internet has been normalized.

>>105981823 (OP)
Since I don't and don't have to, I say let them get rekt.

>>105981823 (OP)
Why? if you aren't being toxic then you have nothing to worry about. Or are you saying things you shouldnt be?

>>105981823 (OP)
I love it because I can dox and harass mutts with impunity.

>>105981887
Why not both? How much of a pussy do you have to be to have a * completely * persona the moment you're anonymous?

"b-b-but people will attack, dox, and send me pizza if im toxic," that shit didn't happen in high school nor in the most toxic workplace. Your real name on a portfolio somewhat adjacent to you calling an internet tyrone a nigger, is what? a death sentence? is some terminally online amerimutt shitlib going to ddos me only because they know my name?

>>105982192
ps: I'm not saying we shouldn't have anonymity. However, you are a massive fucking cuck if you need anonymity to be toxic or otherwise piss people off. Welcome to the real world, bitch. People are cunts and nobody should care what the terminally online offended amerimutt "i cant get through a phone call or restaurant menu" zoomer think/might do.

>>105981887
The window for what is toxic or "problematic" can change at any moment and for any reason.

>worry about
Freedom of speech as a principle does not depend upon this, for the reason above.

>>105981823 (OP)
wtf tell me you don't have a "junk" phone that isn't registered to you? Have you even taken the time to build fake accounts?

>>105982192
>>105982254
you sound like someone who has been bullied online, you just have an unlikable aura

>>105981823 (OP)
Blame facebook and the dumbfucks

>>105982309
>The window for what is toxic or "problematic" can change at any moment and for any reason.
Yea, no thanks. Chasing zoomer trends of what is and isn't offensive in a world about as important as the fax machine is pretty retarded. It must be a sad to live in a made up reality crafted by fake personas masquerading as real named NPCs, I mean "people". Perhaps that's perhaps expected on linkedin, but everywhere else? Ew, no. Give me some facebook boomer drama.

What exactly are the noymillennial and zoomers so offended by that you wouldn't say to your mechanic, abdul the turkgey barber, or your extended friend group anyway?

>Freedom of speech as a principle does not depend upon this, for the reason above.
The aforementioned "people" don't believe in alienable rights. Sorry chud.

The worse part is if you refuse to use a cell phone nearly 90% of the web is now off limits to you. Can't even read the comments while lurking on most places. Even the so-called "free speech" ones.

I am lucky I still have a large batch of gmail accounts. But they're slowly being taken away from me one-by-one. I lost one last month that had a large youtube account attached to it with nearly 100k subs.

>>105982674
In your case I would just buy a cheap plan for a month and ditch the number after

>>105982693
Also there's cheap sms verifying services. Costs about $1 for a number.

>>105982693
>>105982700
>what is 2fa
imagine being this much of a privacy larper you think you can just abandon a number

>>105982709
You just disable it?

>>105982415
That isn't possible in a lot of countries. Even the mutts struggle to go online with anything besides the latest 24 month contract "inog 200 7G subband we'll get the license next year" phone.

Besides, "isnt registered to you," the fuck do you mean? If you're schizo about the phone being registered to you, you've already failed by using it as a persistent root for your online identity while simultaneously beaconing off every other radio tower in a 2 mile radius of your house. Oh, but sure, that monthly pay as you go top on transaction coming out of your bank account, as captured by your local jeet stores cameras, thats what keeps you anonymous, right?

>>105982068
>>105982254
>>105982747
Go away euroslime

>>105982674
>I lost one last month that had a large youtube account attached to it with nearly 100k subs.
What was their "reason"?

>>105982792
Isn't Google still banning entire gmail/drive/related SSO accounts if you dare to say nigger on the dead jewesses toy social media project / "YOU MUST CARE ABOUT LATE NIGHT SHOWS AND TERRORISTS" propaganda service?

>>105982726
No, you don't understand goy. You must have an updated phone number and 2fa for your own security.

>>105982975
Oh probably, thank god I never went on any of those stupid social media things.

>>105981823 (OP)
You just didn't raped enough people to justify not doing it.

>>105981823 (OP)
>>105981887
JUST BE NICE YOU LITTLE SHITS, OR ELSE
https://www.foxnews.com/media/german-prosecutors-tell-60-minutes-its-crime-insult-people-online-government-raids-offenders-homes