why aren't you bootstrapping your own custom language, anon?

stop using that word

>>105995574 (OP)
im too busy being productive, sorry

Because C is already perfect.

>>105995574 (OP)
>HERE IS CONSTANT SAAR
>I MESSIGIFIED YOUR HANDLES SAAR HERE IT IS

>>105995581
not op but its kind of funny that u find that annoying, don't be so grumpy, grandpa.

>>105995574 (OP)
answering op's question: I haven't because its too hard and people that teaches how to do it use fancy shit like weird macros or lists instead of arrays and I had never heard of those things because I have only programmed simple video games, so it makes it quite complicated for me.

>>105995574 (OP)
> why aren't you bootstrapping your own custom language, anon?
> code screenshot contains comment "need to make sense of this to work"
opinions and thread entirely discarded.

>>105995800
kys

>>105996030
'here variable: sym' looks up a variable in the environment or establishes a new one if one wasn't already present and replies with a Reference object for the variable. Reference handles '<-' by mutating the value of the variable in the environment.

with the current semantics, the code won't work because 'here variable: 'receiver <- receiver.' first declares 'receiver' in the new scope and then assigns to it its own value, whihc would just be nil for an uninitialized variable. if 'variable:<-' is defined as a keyword message rather than two binary messages on separate classes, the desired semantics can be implemented :3

>>105995574 (OP)
jeet font

>>105995574 (OP)
>>105996181

What font is it?

>>105995574 (OP)
I have been for a while, it just takes a while cos I just do it as it comes, so I get hard stuck at certain points.
For example, I've been stuck parsing binary operations, and I know that it's a solved problem with standard algorithms, but I'd like to solve the problem myself.

I have been for a while, it just takes its time cos I just do it as it comes, so I get hard stuck at certain points.
For example, I've been stuck parsing binary operations, and I know that it's a solved problem with standard algorithms, but I'd like to solve the it myself.

>>105996085
no u
he's right, this is so retarded, I csnt believe op picked it as sn example that's supposed to encourage people to do it

Because Ruby existing since 1995.

>>105995574 (OP)
1. every time I get into it, I get really autistic about consistency and elegance and aesthetics and minimalist aaaaaand there you go, I've reinvented lisp. again
2. I'm just too familiar with c. it has inconsistencies and annoyances, but it's like any human language, really. I can use it everywhere for everything. and I do

>>105995574 (OP)
Been there and done that more than once. What's the use case for programming languages no one uses besides (You)?

>>105996320
Looks like American Typewriter

>>105995574 (OP)
>your own custom language
Because i'm not a retarded autistic undergrad that thinks wasting time is cool