Fuck this country.

>>105999470 (OP)
No, wikipedia is shit

>>105999470 (OP)
Yes, UK is irrelevant country now it's New Pakistan and they're working on their funny laws.

thank god those retards arent in eu anymore

>implying America isnt next
the porn laws are already in half the states, shit like Wiki-lies is next.

no loicense?

NO LICENCE? NO WIKIPEDIA.

>"Hey, that bloke is using Wikipedia without a loicence! ARREST HIM!"

>>105999470 (OP)
Laws in the UK have to be deliberate sabotage at this point.
There's no other way to explain this, and occam's razor does not lie.

>>106000540
>at this point
kek

>>105999470 (OP)
Change politics and stop crying like a bitch, bongface.

>>106000771
theyre gonna get a civil war with the islamists
that'll change their politcs allright!

>>105999541
Won't happen and anti porn laws are objectively good for society.

This ridiculous law has prompted me to set up a proxy on my server to push my web browser traffic through a VPN.
Thank you, UK government, for getting me off my ass.

>>105999470 (OP)
>illegal posts
apparently having a sympathy for palestine is an illegal opinion that can land you in jail

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0qn8vz00no

>>106000540
It's thought control. The great experiment of replacement requires wrongthink opinions to be allowed no platform.

>>106000999
which is not feasible. you can't control thought of free men. it will only piss them off. we saw brit rage last year.

COCK AND BALL TORTURE ALSO KNOWN AS CBT

>>105999582
>police officers can't unionize, like Americans
>they do their job anyway
As cucked as Americans.

>>106000826
Well, England came up with the idea of the modern Israel state.

>>106001076
What rage

What are you talking about? UK is not a country, it's a prison.

>>106001114
they had some huge riots when a bunch of little girls got slashed up by a paki. a lot of people got arrested just for walking around.

>>105999470 (OP)
What is this category one service according the the British law?
How is Wikipedia related to it?
What does it have to do with stopping children accessing harmful online material?

>>106001127
Huh. Did anything come out of it?

I thought these bans were only porn sites? How is wiki getting in the crossfire?

>>106001102
in all likelihood balfour was trying to get the jews out of england, given their history or being banished before.
>>106001147
british rage

>>106001157
It sounds like they were Bong version of our Floy riots

>>106001172
>yeah cuh, wuz bri'ish an shieeeeet

>>106001133
any use of nono words like suicide and queer (derogatory) render you category 1

>>106001090
>can't unionize
https://www.polfed.org/
https://www.unison.org.uk/at-work/police-and-justice-staff/
https://www.pcs.org.uk/

>>106001209
>oi mate
>do you have a loicence for that suicide?

>>105999470 (OP)
I wonder what's going to happen. Surely a hefty chunk of the internet for the bongs will be fucked by this causing massive blowback

>>105999470 (OP)
what happened to the UK? were they always shit?

>>106000799
>an actual literal example of "That'll never happen, but if it does it's a good thing!"
how many degrees of fafo are you on my dude

So what websites are bongs allowed to browse, the government's, BBC and The Guardian?

>>106000826
The Glasgow Polis swinging their dpi ruler around again. Alice in Wonderland Shit this now, for sure.

>>105999470 (OP)
good. wikipedia is full of dangerous liberal misinformation

>>106001943
>BBC and The Guardian?
Oi mate I certainly hope you bought a monthly loicense?

>>106001943
>The Guardian?
>HAVE YOU CONTRIBUTED YET TODAY?
>EH? EH?
>JOURNALISTS ARE *STARVING* AS WE SPEAK
>AND YOU'VE CLICKED *3* ARTICLES THIS MONTH ALREADY, YOU CHEAP CUNT
fuck The Grauniad.
Those cunts are Trust Funded up the wazoo and yet they still make Jimmy Wales look reticent.

>>105999470 (OP)
YESSSSSSSSSS
FUCK YEAAAAAAAAAH
We'll finally win the war and keep EU in the "List of countries by GDP". The fucking bongers have been removing it from the page with the excuse that it's "not exactly a country" ever since they left.

>>106001885
2011 and operation yewtree happened

>>106000799
This psy-op is starting to get repetitive, spice it up a bit

>>105999470 (OP)
Maybe remove the photo of some wikipedia editor spreading her pussy from the vagina article, and other material like that, for a start.

>>106002118
Or we just remove Britain and lose nothing.

>>105999470 (OP)
They literally call their TV big black cock and everyone must pay bbc license as a symbolic submission to niggers what did you expect?

>>106003246
citation needed

>>106002118
>Maybe remove the photo of some wikipedia editor spreading her pussy from the vagina article, and other material like that, for a start.
Maybe remove yourself and your contrived faggot opinions from the internet forever instead?

>>106003275
licence needed to view citations

>>106003332
Beat me to it cannot imagine the levels of sadcunt to specifically go on a page on anatomy and being shaken to the core by having to see a vagina.

>>106000826
Palestine Action is a designated terrorist organization, having sympathy for Palestinians is not the problem, it's supporting terrorist organizations. I'd guess you're a fan of Hamas Piker as well.

>>105999470 (OP)
It doesn't really matter anymore, Qwen3 fits on your phone.

>>106004590
who did they terrorize? a couple of warplanes?
typical britcuck.

>>106004590
wait you're a britcuck, you can't be on 4chan anymore. it's the law. i'm calling the bobbies on your. screenshotted for evidence.

>>106004621
>>106004632
American but ok.

Wikipedia does need restrictions their admins have been out of control for 20 years.

>>106004828
yeah not with that union jack flag hanging in your room. you have to go back.

>>106004855
>Wikipedia does need restrictions
none of this is restricting the sites in any way tho. It's just restricting a narrow geographical segment of users. The 'affected' sites will (should..) probably just decide, Brits aren't worth the hassle and ban them altogether, like the global lepers these petty-minded arseholes would truly have us become. Rather than admit, they may indeed have overshot the mark with their endless dystopian fucking nonsense, once again.

>>105999470 (OP)
>the left eating itself
you love to see it

>>106005643
The Online Safety Act was introduced by Conservative Party members, retard

>>105999470 (OP)
UK is quickly becoming like chinkna but without the advantages

>>106005643
The left?
Wikipedia isn't run by the left, isn't it run by a bunch of fucking liberals?

>>106005763
It's run by archivists, they're likely liberal

>>106005701
>europe
>conservative party
lmao