Thread 106000570 - /g/ [Archived: 51 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:13:58 PM No.106000570
file
file
md5: a9e7f96a761af15b01965d350ee637d0🔍
I never really post here, but I feel like this is a good place to ask about this. AI is really on the way to take over as many jobs as it can. I'm wondering, realistically, what is the outcome of this? If a few million people lose their jobs due to automation, what will happen to them? Is there any precedent in history we can look to?
Replies: >>106000600 >>106000634 >>106000713 >>106000758 >>106001190 >>106001522
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:16:25 PM No.106000600
>>106000570 (OP)
>AI is really on the way to take over as many jobs as it can.
retard
>Is there any precedent in history we can look to?
retard confirmed

>doesnt even ask chat gpt
turbo retard
ai has been replacing jobs since the 60's
and all you know is advertisement
you can take all you think you know
and throw it into the garbage
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:19:06 PM No.106000630
yes, nobody knows, they will seek other employment or become permanently unemployed, not at the scale and speed its going to happen (the industrial revolution was more gradual)
Replies: >>106000687
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:19:12 PM No.106000634
>>106000570 (OP)
its called the Depression in the 1920s.
you'll be lining up for hours for a single piece of mouldy bread and you'll be happy
Replies: >>106000687
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:23:15 PM No.106000687
>>106000630
completely fucking retarded
job automation is a robotics problem, not a programming one
>>106000634
retard comparison
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:25:59 PM No.106000713
>>106000570 (OP)
>AI is really on the way to take over as many jobs as it can
Name one.
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:26:10 PM No.106000717
>job automation is a robotics problem, not a programming one
which means its already been solved
but hasnt been implemented
so theres ulterior motives

same with engineer ai
it is a solved problem but the industry is decided to keep going in the wrong direction.
since 5 years already

jobs aint gonna disappear
because ubi would mean loss of power for non governmental actors
and automation means ubi

whatever you mighjt be thinking about- dont
this is the only solution that satisfies all parameters
engi ai:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdG4gUTowXc
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 7:30:52 PM No.106000758
>>106000570 (OP)
they'll get jobs in other professions.
have you been outside, ever?
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 8:18:03 PM No.106001190
>>106000570 (OP)
5 to 10 % unemployed people is the desirable goal for the market.
If unemployment is at 0 % it means that companies literally cannot hire.
The problem rises when the rate is above 10 %, and especially long term unemployment.
As long as people can still get jobs nothing is out of place, the market is working as intended.
The thing is that AI is taking the top jobs right now, so it's not really an issue because the market will adapt and restructure itself around these changes.
The part that is scary though is general purpose automation driven by AI, this is going to take the bottom tier jobs and there won't be really any jobs left for those people.
We would have to introduce some kind of universal basic income or kill these people via wars, diseases or genocide before they'll destroy the AI or society itself.
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 8:59:16 PM No.106001522
>>106000570 (OP)
We can't look at to any precedent in history since this will happen so fast and be the biggest transformation of society ever. The value of human labor will go to zero, which means almost no one will have value in an economic sense. No one knows what the outcome is, but I don't really see a good one.