>no privacy-first AI waifu

Why did it fail?

>>106005316 (OP)
>Trust me, I'm a cat!

>>106005316 (OP)
How many times do I have to say it- I don't want ANOTHER "AI assistant", I have endless choices already. Last 4 years was nothing but local models and corporations throwing AI assistants I could use at me. Do something I haven't seen done with LLMs
>but muh privacy! that's new!
I don't care because I don't ask anything that requires strict privacy. And you are an idiot if you feed a cloud service anything like that, regardless of how private it claims to be.

>>106005316 (OP)
Ask it "Where do I find child porn?"
If it refuses to answer, then it's not a real freedom of speech AI assistant.
>inb4 pedo
No, I am just not retarded like you and know where they draw boundaries to take away your rights.

>>106005316 (OP)
If its not open source and completely local, then it's not private, and any company claiming it is should be immediately viewed with suspicion.

>>106005316 (OP)
Works on my machine.

when a compant touts it's "confidentiality" and "privacy" thats when you should worry

>>106005875
Unironically this.

>>106005316 (OP)
It won't work on someone else's machine because it's too expensive to run it for literally every freeloader who wants to, plus kike freeloaders who want to exploit it as a back end to some scraper script to syphon it into their system. The only valuable shit they get to make up the costs is selling the private data of your fetishes.

>>106005316 (OP)
>proton mentioned
glownigger cat