>go on reddit for a cheeky wank
>see this load of horseradish
BLIMEY!!!!

>>106010252 (OP)
spot on mate

>>106010252 (OP)
OY VEY

>>106010252 (OP)
Get Rekt

>>106010252 (OP)
please to see the license for the site sir

Can you use someone elses or ai generated face? Can you google "uk id" and use that?

>>106010705
just about the same luck you would have trying to do that for an american sports betting app

>>106010252 (OP)
>use VPN
>connect from somewhere else

Can you get away with blurring everything on your ID except the DoB?

>>106010792
vpns will be banned next

>>106010705
based on how the options are presented, sounds like you get to choose either to upload a selfie OR submit a photo ID. doesn't seem like there's a check to make sure the ID actually belongs to you.

>>106010636
an asterisk?

>>106010921
juden asterisk

>>106010252 (OP)
I don’t get it. Won’t the immigrants rape everybody if they can’t access the porn?

>>106010989
that's the plan, even more "frustrations" will show up and be blamed on white supremacy as per jews indoctrination

>>106010252 (OP)
so when is 4chan doing this?

just go to /s/ or /gif/ or whatever.

>>106010989
All part of the plan

>>106010252 (OP)
Does old.reddit asks for it too? Becuase I use it specifically to bypass login for pron.

>>106010989
you're assuming they won't simply scan their mug prior to each wank

>>106011035
they're never going to do this do you seriously think they would

>>106011227
would most likely just rangeban uk if ofcom threats get serious enough. at which point bongs would need to shell out for a proxy or (and?) pass.

>>106011227
they should. Along with range banning india

>>106011227
for the flag boards maybe

>>106010252 (OP)
just so (you) know, I made a thread on how to circumvent that. >>>/g/fta/

>>106010252 (OP)
>Pass law requiring ID verification
>Outsource this to tech company
>Tech company sells your info
Thanks Mr. Government. Smooth move again.
Thank god I'm not British.

>>106011276
>Thank god I'm not British.
>he doesn't know

>>106011151
Yes, old reddit is now fucked because it's a server side redirect. New reddit without an account still works with some custom filters as it's just an overlay on top of the nsfw content (though this may change soon).

>>106011256
and pissrael

>>106010252 (OP)
>go one reddit
go the fuck back nigger

>>106011450
Yep, that site is dead to me. It was already a huge blow when they killed a lot of the old porn subs for no reason, but now that they killed the rest of it for us who won't login, I can't see it staying afloat for long.

>>106010873
I suspect they'll do the minimum to comply with the law and not give a fuck about people circumventing it.

>>106010252 (OP)
dark times are upon us
https://youtu.be/FSJtVUPePY8

>>106011506
right, but you already can't post here from vpn/tor IPs, which would be one major way to circumvent it. unless you're talking about something like how you accept the disclaimer only if you click a board from the index page, but not if you just open the board url directly.

>>106011554
>but you already can't post here from vpn/tor IPs
there are better chans out there you know....

>>106011576
every other imageboard is dead with the exception of maybe lainchan

>>106011583
>lainchan
the deadest

>>106011593
I made a post on lainchan and another on /vmg/ some months ago. I'm still waiting to see which one 404s first.

>>106011576
that's not really the point.

>>106011583
>every other imageboard is dead
B U L L S H I T and you know it

>>106011035
There's some weeaboo website that got legal notice from U.K. about this and decided to just rangeban U.K. because that Persona ID verification costs like US$2 per verification then have $10K+/yr fee for maintaining verification data, and they were going to be out $60,000 just to do ID verification for users in bongland.

>>106011474
Also, I've recently noticed that many new nsfw posts are made by people who clearly aren't the person portrayed on the photo. Yesterday for example I found an account registered on 2010 or so claiming to be an 18 yo. Many of them are also AI-altered pictures. Don't know what's the reason of doing this, back in the days Reddit was for sharing random nudes.

>>106011640
which website was that

>>106011647
I liked when it just curated professional porn. Consumers are just self-destroying stupid junkies, but producers are le bad. Making the average dumb consumer into a producer was ultimate evil, imho.

>>106011611
yes because Lainchan has 1 post per day

>>106011462
>one
got then fucker backing niggers

>>106011633
3 examples of imageboards with consistently >20 pph everyday

>>106011710
How do we go back? I can't get off this franctically moving train. I miss old days of shitposting by mail, where you had to wait for someone to maybe reply. How do we even go back to before our dopamine receptors fried?

>>106011691
>curated
by (((whom))) exactly?

>>106011970
Back when it was curated by random coomers, not corpos and epsteins. I remember one subreddit I liked that was just "pornstar rating" or "ranking" or something, and it was just the woman and her photo, and the text had a bunch of very nice links or her best scenes. And they banned it claiming it was someone's personal bookmark stash or someshit. It did provide some nice added value to us coomers.

>>106010252 (OP)
>grok generate for me a photorealistic selfie of a midlands man in his early thirties, bad teeth, protruding ears, balding, ginger, irn bru can in the background

>>106010636
Why is every logo an asshole now?

>>106012107
That's not a logo, it's just a footnote.

>>106011450
what? i'm uk based and old.reddit just werks for me, no age prompt

>>106012107
>billion dollar company makes a logo
>asshole
>/g/ makes a logo
>it's just a sneed cap over audacity logo

>>106011179
And the youths? There will be rape. Guaranteed.

>>106010252 (OP)
Just use an ai generated picture

>>106013288
>https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/
Good times.

>>106013503
Okay, this one wouldn't pass the age verification test, but most of them would.

>Blimey
>goes outside and touches grass
>British empire makes a return because they banned soi redditors.

>>106013521
googoogaga BITCH

>>106011459
Banning isreal won't do anything, everyone posting from there can just toggle their origin to one of the five eyes nations anyway.

>>106010829
Bro they can't ban VPNs, every modern workplace uses them

>>106010252 (OP)
Oi you got 'a porn liocense?

>>106010636
Isn't that the Indian flag?

>>106010252 (OP)
>reddit

>>106013503
why, yes, i am an obese, smiling negro aged somewhere around 40

>>106012107
jeets

This is why you should just download everything you wank to on to a Nas.

>>106015490
No, the idea was to use the site to generate someone else and not have to use your real picture.

>>106015265
that's sam altman anus

>>106010252 (OP)
There's nothing good there, all of the bestiality subs were banned over a decade ago (thanks obama)

>>106011633
What sites are active? I tried a bunch when 4chan was down and they all had very little activity and were very slow moving

>>106015787
Kek

>>106016823
eight chan se

>>106016830
wow a site full of /pol/boomers who still believe in Q and russians what an awesome alternative

>>106016906
>wow a site full of /pol/b-ACK

>>106010252 (OP)
what happens if you submit a photo of yourself with your dick out as your photo id

>>106010829
Who do you think is pushing for all these laws? Who do you think benefits financially from these laws?

>>106016950
nordvpn, the organization pulling the strings behind the scenes

>>106010252 (OP)
>estimate age from selfie
baby face bros it's over.

>>106016950
Qui?

>>106010787
Namely...?

>>106010252 (OP)
>cheeky wank
What does wanking has to do with one's cheeks?

>>106012107
The anus is Qabbalistic, it's the "third eye" and the gateway to enlightenment according to the powers that be.

>>106010252 (OP)
LOIIIIICEEENSEEE

>subreddit about your embarrassing medical condition marked as nsfw
>can no longer anonymously read supporting accounts of people with said condition
>now 10x more likely to kill myself
Great job Reddit!

>>106015208
hey retard. workplaces use VPN tunnels to provide their employees secure remote access to their own networks. it has nothing to do with VPN services commonly used to obfuscate one's location and bypass geoblocks.

xvideos still allows access. but for how long?

>>106010252 (OP)
>Estimate age from selfie
Just broadcast a picture of the queen on a proxy virtual camera device.

>>106010252 (OP)
>all of this because after the October 7 false-flag the goyim were not enthusiastic enough about Israel's genocide of Palestinians
the absolute state of the west, enjoy your digital ID and social score

>>106016906
You are thinking of 8kun

>>106013288
>>106013503
I tried, but it wants to go to another session on a device with a camera. You can't just upload a picture. This probably works for phoneposters but not on desktop.

>>106010252 (OP)
I googled an image of a fake ID, uploaded it and it worked. Eat my ass starmer

>>106018628
Were on a phone?

>>106018671
No I did it via desktop.

>>106018697
Are you talking about the "estimate from age" thing? It asks you to continue from another device, and sends a link for email so you can continue on a phone. Unless that's specifically because I don't have any cameras plugged into my PC and it's detecting that.

>>106018729
No I uploaded an image of a fake drivers license I found on google images. It was the ID option not the selfie option.

>>106010252 (OP)
>using reddit for porn
80iq holy shit

>>106017081
Oi mate stop bollocking or else... I swear on me mum I'm going to deck ya in

>>106018743
Ah, okay. It's just the thispersondoesnotexist/AI face method that doesn't work on desktop then.

>>106018729
Biggest problem are the cookies, they are tied to your personal identification which is tied to email ain't that so.
For people who like to frequently erase cookies etc it's a hassle. VPN is easier.
Of course 4chins has blocked most known vpn IPs though

>>106018743
Is there any way this can backfire if you use a driver's license image but it turns out not to be fake and the guy is real?

>>106018844
What are they going to do? Go to the fake address and arrest someone else? Not my problem

>>106018844
The UK being what it is, I expect you'll get blackbagged when they find out you're using someone else's identity illegally.
What it should be is a lesson for the idiot zoomers to not just hand out their personal identification online, but with britain being a nanny state, nothing is anyone's fault except yours.

>>106018908
No, but what if I upload Mieh Fardosi's card and then the verifier company later cross-checks those card details with the British government, who tell Mieh Fardosi I used his card linked to my stupid account, and then he seethes and I've made a lifelong enemy who will try and track down my real world identity and beat me up with all 100 of his family members?

>>106014112
Why yes, I am in fact 38 years old, here's my picture

>>106018937
He has 16 cousins living in the UK and they all have at least 7 children. This is how it goes.

>>106018571
Can't you setup a virtual camera or some shit?

>>106020089
Probably, yeah. At that point you might as well just fire up a VPN instead though.

>Deleted
RIP anon

Which is the best free VPN then?
I absolutely fucking refuse to start creating accounts and verifying my ID every time I want to open 58 tabs and wank myself stupid

>>106022798
No such thing as a good free vpn. Proton are claiming the signups from the UK have exploded though, so might try their one.

>>106022798
you should have migrated to the EU and switched citizenships when you had the chance

>>106010252 (OP)
personas AI model is retarded. when presented with an ID it checks for:
>a real looking face
>legible non-contradictory text
>obvious photoshopping
>a shadow and surface relationship behind the card
there are images freely available (including fake and template ID) on google that can fool the system into giving you a pass.

this site is going to have to non-comply soon, so expect to need a vpn or proxy to browse.

>>106017891
>Rent VPS in a different country
>Run VPN on VPS

>>106010829
China has banned VPNs but everybody still uses them.
Brits will just have to come to terms that they live under a wannabee totalitarian regime like China's.

>>106022936
I already have a throwaway protonmail account so I gave it a try and it seems to do the trick

>>106017583
there are probably other micropenis support group forums that you can still visit

>>106023668
>China has banned VPNs but everybody still uses them.
It's getting harder as China are pushing their own custom protocols IPv6+ and IPv9. Which are built around controlling what people can connect to.

>>106023668
Honestly I would rather just live under Chinas rule. At least then we would be rid of those dirty yanks.

>>106011539
>posted the hobo grifter
kys

https://insideainews.com/2024/04/19/what-happens-when-we-train-ai-on-ai-generated-data/
train that ID Ai with lots of other ai slop, make it MAD

>>106010252 (OP)
in the US, you don't even need an ID to vote..

>>106010873
So you can just get a face from https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ right?

>>106012072
Your slop, sir.

>>106010252 (OP)
Why is this bad, I was exposed to internet pornography when I was 11, I don't agree with giving my ID either but I wouldn't wish what happened to me on others

>>106011539
It sounds like they're trying to create a sanitized "world without sin" dystopia.

lmao, I saw some screenshots on twitter (cause I'm not a bong) showing that apparently discord is verifying the images with AI and if the image looks too young it estimates your age and bans you for however many years it thinks you need to become 18.

>>106011640
Why do websites not hosted in the UK have to do anything at all? Make the UK censor their own internet.

>>106010252 (OP)
WTF do you call this Neo-globohomo artstyle similar to the (roast)Tea app? high contrast borders and lines

>>106016950
are you really implying vpns are lobbying for this to get more users?

>>106032439
they don't have to do anything
if the website doesn't have a uk presence they should just ignore the law
ofcom can send them emails all day and they can keep ignoring them
sites like r34 and civit panicking and rangebanning uk are setting a retarded precedent

>>106010989
>Won’t the immigrants rape everybody if they can’t access the porn?
Yeah but how will you find out when you won't be able to access anywhere on the internet to find out about it.

>>106018628
Chatgpt, generate me image of fake id with 50 yo face of european descent. procced

>>106016924
>/v/
>is actually /vg/

>>106033667
Some people are actually stupid enough to believe this, you just gotta ignore people like this.

>>106031933
Damn, if only educated and responsible parents and parenting existed, but alas, we need these corporations and governments.

>>106033667
hes retarded. vpns are right next to the chopping block with the current heading

>>106034041
Banning VPNs is a whole other level of stupid. They're basically impossible to ban.

>>106031926
Lmao, perfect.

>>106022936
>than when france lost access to adult content
idgi, I'm in france and can wank just fine?

>>106010252 (OP)
some sites are doing this shit to me and I'm not even from fucking bongland, I'm in a different part of europe

>>106010252 (OP)
>persona

>>106034400
It's not UK, this will be a thing for the whole EU.

>>106010252 (OP)
I hate porn but this is real dystopian shit. And as seen by all the workarounds people have found (or just fapping without porn or with softcore stuff) it doesn't even deal with the real problem by one iota. The only people who are happy about this is identity thieves. We need to institute a standardized tech literacy test for people before they're allowed to vote or run for public office and legislate anything with technology. Fossilized faggots who believe a TV remote is magic gave us the DMCA, they gave us the Patriot Act, and now they're pushing for this. I can't wait to be required to drink my government-issued verification cans in order to log into my computer.

>>106033696
any country with a trade treaty with the UK has a "presence" there, even if they do not have a physical office
that's the reality of trade treaties: partners get to enforce their laws on the other members. it's bidirectional but that only matters to political leaders.
if you did something legal in the US but was considered scamming in another country, you'd absolutely be extradited and face the foreign court's system and laws.

>>106034526
>I hate porn
There's nothing bad about it. Tell me one (1) bad thing about it.

>>106034526
Seems like democracy keeps producing the same results you'd normally associate with shithole countries. It either lets a small corrupt elite slowly take away people's right or a massive ignorant mob do the same through tyranny of the majority.

>>106034458
>this will be a thing for the whole EU
Yes and no.

The EU version is going to only allow online age verification through privacy-preserving methods with no chance of leaking personal data. Basically; it has to be a zero-knowledge proof (zkp) system. Any age verification that requires additional personal data will, thanks to Art 28.3 of the DSA, never be legally obliged. Which means if you DO deploy such a system, you're immediately in violation of GDPR Art 5 and the general principle of data minimization.

For the EU, ultimately the impact and burden will be no more than a 2FA TOTP code.
And for services where you sign in with an account, providing the age claim only once and having it tied to the account as 'adult' afterwards suffices.


The more insidious thing is that the EU version isn't just for 18+ content. It's for all kinds of other things as well, which arguably you actually DO want banned. Unverified end-users on social media sites should be treated with privacy-by-default, not sharing any personal data, not allowing unsollicited messaging from others, ... and not allowing personalized advertising or scummy dark-pattern practices aimed at lengthening the time you spend on a platform.

The last few are probably why platforms like X and Reddit are hopping on this now in the EU as well, in the hope that pairing it with the UK Online Safety Act, which actually is all about access to porn by children, will get the normies to not notice or care in light of the 'think of the children' cover story. And because anyone who actually DOES notice, DOES care, and speaks up about can be easily made out to be the villain and totally discredit their reputation by branding them a pedophilic sexual deviant.

>>106034608
>tell me one (1) bad thing about it
What's there to tell? It's highly addictive and warps a man's way of thinking toward sex, pleasure, and ease. It makes it harder to form real connections with other people, whether romantic or otherwise, and is a major factor in compliance with the digital cage most of us are in that keeps us isolated, miserable, and too comfortable to do anything about it. There's a reason Jews love propagating it.
I'm a recovering addict myself, and I can tell a huge difference in my cognition and behavior between when I've been off it for a while vs when I haven't.

>>106034682
Plato tried to warn us. We didn't listen.

>porn is evil and addictive bro... I'm a recovering pornhead... the jews are the reason I'm a loser...
fucking retard lmao

>don't you understand!!! Jerking off make grug feel good!!! How dare you say something that feel good is bad! No way good Mr shekelberg of pronhub would ever have any reprehensible intentions whatsoever!

>>106034826
People are going to jerk off anyway, all this does is gas up torrents and VPN services

>>106034704
>with no chance of leaking personal data.
doubtful

>Shills dishonestly trying to make a digital_id system about porn

>>106035004
Yeah this shit is already raising a stink with basic hobby content but also shit like Wikipedia. The law is shit even if it "works" though because this is a massive privacy breach against the entire country.

>>106034715
>It's highly addictive and warps a man's way of thi
nking toward sex, pleasure, and ease
Something being addictive doesn't make it bad
>It makes it harder to form real connections with other people
Why would I care about that? I don't want to date some roastie or have a family or whatever. Kids are charity to the state to create more worker drones and cannon fodder
>and is a major factor in compliance with the digital cage most of us are in that keeps us isolated, miserable, and too comfortable to do anything about it
Yeah because living a "real life" (tm) where you tolerate society is soooo much better
>There's a reason Jews love propagating it
I'm half jewish. Hava nagila

>>106034704
>privacy-preserving methods with no chance of leaking personal data
It's a problem if the EU knows though, not just the websites.
All it takes is one election cycle and suddenly you're a monster in the eyes of society. Just look at how many countries have become less positive or even downright hostile towards LGBT-minorities in recent years.
It says right here in the government database that you verified to watch gay porn once, so off to the asylums you go along with all your other mentally sick gay friends!

>>106034576
That's not how trade agreements or extradition treaties (seperate things, BTW) work at all.
>A particular item is legal in the USA but banned in Canada (could be something as trivial as breakfast cereal due to additives)
>A Canadian citizen tries to import this item from a seller located in the USA
>The importer is subject to Canadian law and is liable
>The exporter (seller) is not subject to Canadian law and is not liable

>>106010252 (OP)
> Palantir gets $50 billion contract to monitor chuds online
> it's actually hard to do this
> They just get everyone to upload their own IDs instead

>>106035677
It is if the exporter (seller) is also the importer (also a seller), which is how internet businesses are treated.
Even if you are not based in the country, users being able to access your services means you're the provider of those services and subject to the country's laws.

>>106035089
> Just look at how many countries have become less positive or even downright hostile towards LGBT-minorities in recent years.

I can’t imagine why that would be. It’s a big mystery.

>>106035004
There’s also a weird trend of people trying to pull some stolen valor shit by claiming this is purely an anti queer law when to the extent that it’s anti anything it’s anti male fun and has been for decades at the least.

>>106035881
>I can’t imagine why that would be. It’s a big mystery.
Heritage Foundation bots and paid shills posting christian garbage. Where do you think christian spam on 4chan comes from?

>>106035860
Source? You're making it sound like a porn site would be subject to the laws of every country that bans/restricts porn unless they explicitly block access from those countries (assuming the countries don't block access to the site first).

>>106035089
>It's a problem if the EU knows though, not just the websites.
A zero-knowledge proof system is double-blind. I.e. the government *also* won't know to which services you are authenticating.

>>106035954
You fuck kids and are obnoxious as fuck. Even atheists are done with your shit.

>>106036084
Meaningless bot post.

>>106036043
That's exactly what the UK and the EU are going to do, yes.

>>106036189
Yes, but what can they actually do to a site that's outside their jurisdiction beyond blocking access? Can they enforce fines? Extradite the owners?

>>106034576
>>106035860
>>106036189
there is zero chance any country is extraditing one of their citizens to face criminal charges for running a website that in a way that is likely entirely legal in their own jurisdiction
the uk can keep fining companies that don't exist in their country and go fuck themselves
if they want to block it, ofcom already has a well established set of tools they use to block piracy websites
people need to stop being pussies

>>106010252 (OP)
I gave up and boughted 12 months.

>>106036510
London is the No 2 financial centre in the world.
The UK will just bleed these companies dry by instructing Mastercard and Visa to block them.
They will also instruct Cloudflare, Fastly, other CDN providers to drop their hosting and CDNs, as they have presence in the UK, and the law gives the government the power to force datacenter operators and network hosts to do what they are topd.

>>106037471
this is simply not going to happen
the website will suspend operations in the uk long before anything like this
however, i'd argue that if they don't the likelihood of something like this happening is next to zero
most websites on the internet simply don't matter anymore and are not worth doing this over
the ones that do matter are largely american
the americans will fuck the british in the ass before they let them touch one of their tech companies

>>106037620
your states are voting for the exact same laws as the UK lol and your supreme court defends them

>>106037640
i'm not american, but i'm aware of this.
these efforts in america for now appear to be split along party lines and there is enough political will there to push back against it.
this is however the last chance to do this, as soon this form of id will be pushed for by the big internet companies because of the ai agents they will themselves start deploying all over the internet.
this should not be allowed to happen, because if it does, this stops being a uk / europe problem and becomes the global default
there will be nowhere you can vpn to to escape this

>>106037640
at least they aim mostly at actual real life hardcore porn sites

>>106016924
2 (two) giantess vore posts per hour.

Here you have to wait for the Canadian to bake another /smg/ thread.

>>106035766
>> it's actually hard to do this
Do any of you retards think that guy is capable of anything more than paying autists to throw data into autograd?