>>106013849 (OP) >Nah you gotta explain how this happened? passmark's data got thier data from people running passmark benchmark. if amd just spam the benchmark 24/7 they can get it over 90%
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 1:13:27 AM No.106014327
It means that even with AMD not knowing all the secret handshakes and blowjobs for the oems, Intel's product is so shit they're going to put up with AMD anyway.
AMD has had majority since they have bought out Xilinx that has majority of server market share, but not as if average /g/ay user knows about anything other than Intel and AMD, stupid fucking niggers
>>106013849 (OP) intel had long contracts in place 10-15 years, and now that those are up and they have nothing to compete with epyc, AND amd has managed to prove that epyc is a stable and performance platform over the last 8 years. Can't be that surprising they decided against renewing contracts.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 2:32:15 AM No.106014863
>>106013879 Phew, merely a 20% reduction in market share
>>106013849 (OP) Not convinced Google specifically is deploying more Emerald Rapids because they are actually a good value. Blackwell index machines are also Intel.
>>106013879 >based on benchmarks Yeah, I doubt hyperscalers are using passmark