← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106019903

17 posts 10 images /g/
Anonymous No.106019903 [Report] >>106020514 >>106023223 >>106023324
> sqrt(4) == 2; // true
> sqrt(4) == -2 // false
Anonymous No.106019949 [Report]
> doesn't know what a principal square root is

Picrel
Anonymous No.106019950 [Report]
unironically equivalent to the lambda calculus expressions
Anonymous No.106020514 [Report]
>>106019903 (OP)
> sqrt(4) == 2 or -2 // true
works for me
Anonymous No.106020537 [Report] >>106023442
UUHHHHH NEGATIVE BROS?
Anonymous No.106023223 [Report] >>106023244
>>106019903 (OP)
What's the definition of "function" in math?
Anonymous No.106023244 [Report] >>106023286
>>106023223
a map from one set to another
Anonymous No.106023286 [Report] >>106023421
>>106023244
What's a "relation"? How might a relation not be a function?
Anonymous No.106023324 [Report] >>106023383 >>106023455
>>106019903 (OP)
>1.0 + 2.0 == 3.0 // false
Math is fake.
Anonymous No.106023383 [Report] >>106023462
>>106023324
That should be true. Did you make that up?
Anonymous No.106023421 [Report] >>106023583
>>106023286
first thing is that we need to point out the differences between technicalt definitions and linguistic definitions.
a function, of real numbers for example, is a map between to sets both of which being the set of real numbers.
linguistically this is a relation between two sets.
But mathematicians, like every other specialization/science/tech subject, use regular everyday words but ascribe technical definitions to them that might not be exactly the same as the linguistic definition.
so if mathematicians have different technical definitions between function and relation there's probably a reason for it, even if they seem similar in some cases there's probably cases where the differences are important so they have them.
Anonymous No.106023442 [Report]
>>106020537
wait till you hear about complex roots
Anonymous No.106023455 [Report]
>>106023324
it is true
you are a fake
Anonymous No.106023462 [Report]
>>106023383
>Did you make that up?
Yes.
Anonymous No.106023469 [Report]
sqrt(4) == {-2, 2} # True
Anonymous No.106023475 [Report]
Damn sci is here, even their most retarded frog posters are geniuses compared to us.
Anonymous No.106023583 [Report]
>>106023421
These applied mathematicians, whom we call computer scientists, wrote whatever programming language OP complains about as an application of math.