Anonymous
7/25/2025, 10:05:49 PM No.106024249
>that one library which is gpl
>have AI license launder it by re-implementing the functionality itself
>have AI license launder it by re-implementing the functionality itself
Replies:
Thread 106024249 - /g/ [Archived: 8 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 10:09:08 PM No.106024310
Replies:
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 10:13:39 PM No.106024376
>>106024249 (OP)
You cannot license launder with AI generated code. It is not original content and should not be subject to copyright law at all.
You cannot license launder with AI generated code. It is not original content and should not be subject to copyright law at all.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 11:21:28 PM No.106025774
>>106024376
yes you can, you just have the AI write it and then dont release it.
yes you can, you just have the AI write it and then dont release it.
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 1:01:09 AM No.106027258
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 1:12:26 AM No.106027406
>>106024249 (OP)
You don't even need to do that. Corporations, for years, have been writing "wrapper" interfaces around GPL libraries. They then quietly license the wrapper as LGPL, and there's not a thing the GPL cucks can do about it.
You don't even need to do that. Corporations, for years, have been writing "wrapper" interfaces around GPL libraries. They then quietly license the wrapper as LGPL, and there's not a thing the GPL cucks can do about it.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 1:29:10 AM No.106027644
>>106027406
That's not how GPL works.
That's not how GPL works.
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:44:46 AM No.106029159
bump
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:51:46 AM No.106029219
>>106024249 (OP)
how should we combat these fuckers without going full closed source while remaining ethical
some selective source-available approach?
how should we combat these fuckers without going full closed source while remaining ethical
some selective source-available approach?
Replies:
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:55:25 AM No.106029255
>>106029219
Armed violence
Armed violence