Java isn't that bad. It's verbose, but once you get past that it's a perfectly serviceable object oriented language.
The problem is the culture. Indians are by and large too retarded to write good, concise, well-structured code, so they keep throwing the patterns they learned from the Arunachal Pradesh Institute of Technology at the problem until their bloated shitcode works. This leads to a culture of gross overcomplexity.
In my opinion, Java's perfectly serviceable and comfy with fewer language quirks than C++. I don't blame Java for the culture around it.
/g/, are there any serious structural problems with Java that turn you off using it?

>>106026733 (OP)
Scala developers are 99% White.

>object oriented
this is a problem in and of itself, the bottleneck on modern systems is memory bandwidth so all design patterns other than data oriented are fundamentally as invalid as as writing code for a decimal computer. also, oracle.

>>106026733 (OP)
Wasn't Java invented by a white man?

>>106028052
He's a leaf so he's probably partly indian

>>106028078
>Future generations will never know just how white Canada used to be
grim
but, racism aside,
>>106026733 (OP)
I don't think there's anything wrong with using java for normal desktop and server applications that just need to do thing. The cross platform options are great and what's more is that jit compilation can be pretty fast when it matters.
>>106027538
You can write data oriented programs in Java.