why KDE can't make even a calculator right?

>>106026942 (OP)

fyi 3*3 is nine

>>106026942 (OP)
They have different maths in India

>>106026942 (OP)
You mean the buttons being huge because they scale with the window size or what? The column on the right is a bit silly wide, other than that you can just make the window smaller since you're not gaining anything by having it that big anyway.

>>106027058
>maths
oi m8 ye fancy a propa scran at the footy stadium we can take the piss with the lads

>>106026998
>>106027058
>>106027106
>>106027134

>>106026942 (OP)
Why is Linux UI so horrible? Isn't KDE supposed to have the best UI?
If I made my calculator cover almost the whole desktop it's because I want to fucking see it, why are the numbers so small?

we should just delete the ÷ operator from math entirely, stupid fucking thing

>>106027134
he can't be british, they haven't been allowed to use the internet since yesterday

>>106027134
>Amerimutt
Hello folx, don't forget to scan your face on the palantir facecam to login!
Little Johny, we found out you said you don't like Israel, for that we will reduce your credit score by 50%

>>106026942 (OP)
use case for consistent order of operations rules?

For me, it's bc.

>>106027255
I'm not American lmfao

>>106027225
just make them bigger? There's a slider

>>106026942 (OP)
KDE is all about options, I LIKE that my calculator gives me two values to choose from.

>>106027225
>>106027432

>>106027432
>it's not a problem if you can tinker it
This is why Linux will never just work.

>>106027520
That's the whole fucking point of linux you window licker

>European union switches to Linux
>Their automated system for accounting krashes
>They have to do it manually for a few days until the automated system gets back online
>One guy decides to use the calculator app
>Economy krashes

>>106027555

>>106026942 (OP)
I love KDE but holy shit their calculator is so dreadful. Least ergonomic calculator I've ever used, physical or digital.

>>106027597
>not doing the math in your head
I pity you, plebian. A real intillectual like myself simply envisions the equation and figures it out

>>106027550
You look like this

>>106027187
actually it is lol
never used that feature and never will btw

>>106027629
holy shit that looks just like me

>>106026942 (OP)
But the correct answer is 7?

>Waste your time making a calculator for your OS
>Make it useless because you can't be arsed to implement fractions

>>106027668
what the hell's goin on here

>>106027698
man

>>106026942 (OP)
This works on dc

>>106026942 (OP)
This is one criticism of KDE that's actually legit. All the calculators suck. I use Gnome calculator.

>>106026942 (OP)
top is correct, app is wrong

>>106026998
and 6/6 is one retard

>>106027953
retard

>>106027987
i only see one retard itt and it ain't me

>>106028019
6/2(2+1) is not equal 1
it is equal retard

>>106028019
Is it me?

>>106028033
>jeet hands typed this post
yes it does, you do the ORDER of operations
p: (2+1)
e: none
m: 2 x 3
d: 6/6
a: none
s: none
so the answer is one

>>106028047
is your answer nine?

>>106028074
this is why pemdas is retarded
MD and AS don't mean that multiplication always happens before division and addition before subtraction, it's like P>E>M=D>A=S, the / still happens before the * because it's on the left
so it's 9

>>106028161
yes it does retard, to take your bodmas back to india

Get on my level, PLEBDASes.
>((6/2 * 2) + (6/2 * 1))
>((12/2) + (6/2))
>(18/2)
>9
When you encounter parentheses, shove everything in there like a maniac and solve like a true champion.

>>106026942 (OP)
Just use GNOME bro, KDE is a meme

>>106028207
"6/2" = "6 over 2" = "6 * (1/2)"
what is 6 * (1/2) * 3?

>>106026942 (OP)
>99% of people have no idea what the order of operations is.
Why do we even bother?

>>106028089
I never learned PEDMAS I dropped out of high school to smoke meth

>>106028207
>yes it does retard
Ugh, someone who didn't make it through elementary school.

>>106028282
you would get a f in math class

>>106028328
half this thread learned PEMDAS and is getting filtered by this elementary school math problem as a result so you probably made the right choice

i think the answer is 3, you are all retarded

>>106028335
The masses fear true power.

>>106027498
No i didn't, i downloaded it from some package repo

>>106028333
I did retard, i learned this shit in 3rd grade. You're telling me you failed 3rd grade?

>>106028346
pemdas is correct and the answer is one

>>106028346
I know how it works but never really used it.
>you probably made the right choice
Diploma would be nice for resumes but a lot of the people I knew who graduated/did post secondary are just as unemployable as me
t. Canadian

>>106026942 (OP)
Can you make a calculator?

>>106028459
import math

>>106028402
type 6 / 2 * 3 into literally any calculator of your choice

>>106028526
>p: none
>e: none
>m: 2*3
>d: 6/6
>a: none
s: none
anything else faggot

>>106028557
type it into a calculator nigger

>>106028571
what are the calculator's order or operations?

>>106028587
i dont know the source code of every single calculator app out there, but they will all same the same thing which is that you are a nigger that would fail 3rd grade if forced to take it again

>>106028630
>they will all same the same thing
esl please

>>106028676
do not the calculator sir

>>106028676
you made a typo in your last post too but you're already being retarded so i didn't need to rub it in

>>106028725
>retarded
that's you

>>106028390
>I did retard, i learned this shit in 3rd grade.
You learned it wrong, then.

>>106028557
What's 6 - 2 + 3?

>>106028908
21

>>106027639
>pavel
DOCTOR????

>>106027668
>>106027698
you hang someone byt their asshole

>>106028317
is it 6?

>this thread again
6/2*3 is not a mathematical expression

>>106029205
Why not?

>>106028908
using pemdas the answer would be one

>>106028885
>no u
doesn't work like that

>>106029231
it is not made by rules of creating mathematical expressions
there is ambiguity which cannot exist if it was created properly from primitive operations - brackets can only be dropped if ambiguity is not introduced

>>106029271
there is no ambiguity; there is an implicit multiplication sign before brackets that don't have a sign behind them

>>106029301
division is equal in priority to multiplication, which is why this this, with the same exact numbers as in 201x is a gay meme polluting 4chan that spans decades now

>>106029319
Math is read from left-to-right. 6/2(2+1) is just 6/2*3, so 6/2=3, and then times that by 3 = 9. There is no reason to begin solving the problem on the right side with 2(2+1) unless you are an Arab or Hebrew who reads right-to-left.

>>106029382
>Math is read from left-to-right.
if you are a retard, and seems like you are, then you are free to resolve ambiguity in any way you want and continue posting in this hilarious meme thread
I have masters in math and I told you the actual answer

>>106029319
>>106029382
division and multiplication are the same thing

>>106029402
>I have masters in math
Degrees haven't meant shit in a long time and you're the latest case study on this: someone who doesn't even know the fucking order of operations. You don't begin solving the problem by timesing 2 by (2+1) when there's a perfectly good division at the very start of the expression.

>>106029448
kids still use order of operations?
no wonder mathematics scores are down

>>106029416
lol no

>>106029382
left to right is correct but you do multiplication first then division

>>106029481
give me an example of division that isn't multiplication, or vice-versa.
real numbers only
I wasn't the anon you started with

>>106029471
>kids still use order of operations?
MATH uses the order of operations. If you can't agree that 6/2*3=9, then you are not even discussing mathematics.

>>106029501
>If you can't agree that 6/2*3=1, then you are not even discussing mathematics.
fify

>>106029492
>you do multiplication first then division
Multiplication and division are equal; between a multiplication and division operation, you begin with the leftmost one.

>>106029505
Why the fuck are you reading it right-to-left?

>>106029508
wrong, its called order of operations for a reason. You don't just skip steps when following a order

>>106029515
I'm not, you do the multiplication first then division

>>106029518
the order of operations is taught to make it easy
math gives no shits

>>106029535
math has to be done in a certain way or you'll get the answer wrong

>>106029518
>You don't just skip steps when following a order
Correct. However, once you are on the multiplication/division step, you work left-to-right with multiplications and divisions.

>>106029545
correct. which is why the order of operations is wrong
but it's useful to learn

>>106029553
>y-you must follow orders except for this one thing just because
go back to school

>>106029505
Enough ragebaiting for today sir, move on

>>106029558
>math is wrong

>>106029577
you're the one baiting here

>>106029249
It absolutely does work like that.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/PEDMAS
>b-but that's wrong!
No, you.

Building a proper calculator is actually a complicated task because of IEEE 754 quirks.

>>106029581
are you that bored to revive this thread after removing posts?

>>106029566
>except for this one thing
???
Allow me to rephrase.
You start with P, left-to-right. You then do E, left-to-right. You then do M/D, left-to right. You then do A/S, left-to right.

The longer version is that you begin by reading left-to-right looking for P(arentheses), and solve whatever is in the parentheses, from left-to-right, beginning with whatever P(arentheses) may be within, and whatever other P(arentheses may be within those parentheses, etc - once you have isolated sub-expressions completely unmolested by parentheses, you then apply exponents, reading left-to right. You then apply multiplication and division, reading left-to right. You then apply addition and subtraction, reading left to right. Once everything within the parentheses has been solved, you may solve the overall problem, starting with exponents (read from left-to-right), then multiplication and division (read from left-to-right), then finally addition and subtraction (read from left-to-right). It is a consistent and logical system that does not break its own rules at any point.

>>106029602
>y-your wrong
yes
https://www.storyofmathematics.com/glossary/order-of-operations/

>>106029634
>words, words, words
your wrong, multiplication comes first

>>106027584
>use linux
>use kvm with qemu to use Windows exclusive apps
>profit

>>106029700
Multiplication and division are treated equally; when deciding which of the two to perform first, you always perform the leftmost first and work your way rightwards.

>>106029724
>treated equally
nope, its called ORDER of operations for a reason. You don't just stop steps.

>>106029722
Can that utilize your GPU? Also does it let you run the low level anticheats that some games need? I've been looking for a way out of dual booting

>>106029733
*skip

>>106029743
You don't even know the steps that the order applies to. The steps are:
P
E
MD
AS

>>106029761
no the steps are:
p
e
m
d
a
s

>>106029761
also even if yours was correct you would still would do multiplication first

>>106027698
It's someones ass and they are hanging from the hook by their rectum

>>106029768
Where's your source for this?

This source says otherwise:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Conventional_order

>>106029777
Okay, so I messed up a bit. I should have put:
M/D in left to right order
A/S in left to right order

>>106029791
>source
see >>106029696

>>106029795
Your source has two different orders of operation which will give two different answers.

>>106029805

>>106029795
I just read your source, and as anon
>>106029805
states, there's a logical problem with the way they're interpreting PEMDAS and DMAS.

Please check out some other sources.

6 / 2 (2 + 1) = 6 / (2*2 + 2*1) = 6 / (4 + 2) = 6 / 6 = 1

>>106029737
>Can you use your GPU
yes
>Can you use low level anticheats?
No

Kill all /sci/ tourists

>>106029795
https://archive.org/details/algebraelementar01chryuoft/page/14/mode/2up
Read the footnote on page 15.

>>106029835
Yep, that's a conflict.

>>106029733
Yes, the order is parentheses, then exponents, then [WORD NOT FOUND]* operations, then additive operations. Each read from left-to-right; no steps are skipped.

*The English language has no agreed upon hypernym for multiplication and division. However, for addition and subtraction, "additive operations" is sometimes used as a hypernym.

Okay, but does the KDE calculator correctly recognize that 0.99999... = 1? If not then we have a real problem.

>>106029899
if what you are saying is correct (it's not) then why isn't called pedmsa?

>>106029899
multiplicative?
since division is multiplication by the inverse of a number

>>106026942 (OP)
why ESL can't make even a sentence right?

>>106029929
pedmsa and pemdas mean the same thing, because the rule is neither "do multiplications before divisions" NOR "do divisions before multiplications"; the rule is to do whichever happens to be on the left first.

>>106029929
>if what you are saying is correct (it's not) then why isn't called pedmsa?
PEDMAS and PEMDAS are interchangeable.

>>106029966
>both spelled different
>they mean the same thing bro
wrong

>>106029987
colour and color are spelt differently and mean the same thing

>>106029733
Multiplication and division are the same thing.

>>106027639
Implicit mult comes before explicit mult/div

>>106029929
You could also call it PEMDSA, PEDMAS, or PEDMSA (because the D/M and S/A are combined steps).

PEMDAS was probably rolls off the tongue better then all of the combinations.

Why are you still going with what your source says when others have already pointed out its errors?

>>106029996
yet the ORDER of operations state that you do multiplication first

>>106030011
No, they don't. The UK teaches BODMAS (Brackets, Order, Division/Multiplication, Addition/Subtraction); do you think in England, they must always do division before multiplication?

I have the real solution.
If the order of operations is ambiguous, have whoever is supplying the equation define the order of operations.
Because essentially order of operations is just assuming where to put brackets.

>>106030036
By your logic, they do

These brain lets will see x=3
3/3X = 3 instead of 1/3

>>106030045
You're treating the letters of the mnemonics literally, when you're supposed to understand what they actually represent and act accordingly.

>>106030045
Can you provide a direct quote of something I said that demonstrates my alleged logic?

Don't make me tap the sign.

>>106030129
you know books can be wrong right?

>>106030045
No you fucking idiot MATH DOES NOT CHANGE BASED ON GEOGRAPHY

>>106030162
that's the point I'm making, math doesn't change just cause you say so

>>106030144
You are retarded, you should be executed and then be crapped on your grave.

>>106030208
>says the one who does stuff out of order

>>106030185
That is correct. You however don't know what math even is. Your ESL typing style, combined with your instinctual habit of reading right-to-left, really makes me think you're an Arab.

>>106030214
Cope faggot

>>106030227
I am reading left-to-right, pemdas states that multiplication must be done first. Aka you go from left-to-right solving the multiplication first then do the division.

>>106030242
>pemdas states that multiplication must be done first
Humour me this: hypothetically, what should the acronym be if multiplication and division were to be treated equally?

>>106030242
*then you do

>>106030276
>if they were
it would be m/d but its not spelled like that its m then d

>>106030230
>can't refute
>gets mad

>>106030296
>putting slashes in the MIDDLE of an acronym

>>106030296
So you'd have it be PEM/DA/S? What the fuck? That would then imply that PEM is one step, DA is another, and S is the last step. You know you're a fucking retard, right?

>>106030319
>beef poster can't do math

>>106030242
https://www.ncl.ac.uk/webtemplate/ask-assets/external/maths-resources/numeracy/order-of-operations-bodmas.html

Ok pajeet, I know you bought your maths degree at a wet market.

Or

Academia is full of useless retards.

>>106030336
>beef out of nowhere
Wait, YOU'RE the Indian? No wonder. No fucking wonder.

>>106030333
,no it would be written as
p
e
m/d
a/s
but its not written like that

>>106030352
India doesn't use pemdas retard

>>106030360
We can tell.

>>106030345
>reddit spacing

>>106030367
I use pemdas so...

>>106030376
Clearly not. You don't use beef either.

>>106030368
Ok, pajeet.

>>106030379
you don't use your meds
>>106030378
I'm not Indian

>>106026942 (OP)
Why do you use a KDE calculator? Just use bash, or Python or whatever.

>>106030396
Why the fuck should a CALCULATOR be written in Python? Is assembly not abstract enough for 1 plus fucking 1?

>>106030420
Dumbass... python has an interactive runtime environment and you can do your calculations there. Most programming languages have that nowadays.

>>106030507
Or, or, get this: I could click on the calculator pinned to my taskbar and type shit into a GUI. Crazy, I know...

>>106026942 (OP)
>why KDE can't make even a calculator right?
ESL speak. Post beef

>>106030512
You can do the complicated way that doesn't actually work very well, yes. You zoomers forget that a terminal was the normal way, not this GUI nonsense.

>>106030536
>complicated way
What's complicated about clicking on my taskbar shortcut and typing 1+1, while also having a history log and an actual calculator metaphor?

>>106030516
take meds

>>106030595
saar, flip the burger beef patty and put the fries in the bag

>>106030668
take meds

>>106030144
You know websites can be wrong, right?

>>106030682
lets just say that everybody can be wrong

>>106027889
No, 9 is correct answer: first sum inside the brackets, then division, then multiplication.

>>106030692
No, 1 is the correct answer: first sum inside the parenthesis then do the multiplication first, then division.

>>106030715
Why would you not read left to right

>>106030715
t. elementary school dropout

>>106030720
you are, you just do the multiplication first cause it's higher on the list of operations

>>106030724
no green arrow therefore you are that

>>106030729
>do the multiplication first cause it's higher on the list of operations
where did you read this

>>106030737
order of operations
parenthesis
exponents
multiplication
division
addition
subtraction

>>106030747
*multiplication/division
*addition/subtraction
Indians of course find this difficult to understand.

>>106030757
wrong, it's called the ORDER of operations for a reason. You can just skip steps so it's
>multiplication
>division
>addition
>subtraction
not
>multiplication/division
>addition/subtraction

>>106030765
*can't skip

>>106030747
>>106030765
so where did you read this?

>>106030778
when i learned math in 3rd grade

>>106030792
well you didn't learn it

>>106030803
>you did not, uhh just becuase ok

>>106030765
You, sir, are retarded.
The name "order of operations" doesn't mean the acronym is explicit.
That line of argument is a unfounded. Especially seeing short words like "and" are often excluded from acronyms, so it could be derived from "Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction"

>>106030810
>can't read
go back to school

>>106030747
>>106030765
what is 3+5-7+2?

well, according to Deepseek, there is ambiguity, so, both answers are right.

Why does every calculator on a PC have on screen buttons? Who the fuck does that?
This is all you need.

>>106029987
holy retard

>>106026942 (OP)
And windows smokes the competition by giving you a third answer that makes no sense.

>>106026942 (OP)
I'd recommend not to omit operators if you don't want incorrect answers.

6/2*(2+1) works fine everywhere, except for windows, it seems. >>106031427

amerimutts arguing about amerimutt problems

It's been said before, but yeah, don't expect for the krunner calculator to imply multiplications as the parser is made to be able to solve expressions and it could get on the way, always use the operators.

>>106031764
more examples

>>106026942 (OP)
looks like my first c# program i made at 14

>>106030939
wrong >>106029835

ffs not this normie shit again

>>106031427
Try pressing equals.

>>106031789

answer >>106030951

>>106031789
link the article / book

>>106032104
That's retarded, why doesn't it evaluate whatever is on the fucking field?

>>106030951
It doesn't matter what ruleset you use in addition/subtraction equations due to associativity, shitskin

>>106028317
6 * ( 1 / 2 ) * 3 = 6 / 2 *3 = 18 / 2 = 9 because you multiply the dividend only.

>>106032190
Because you used brackets, so it is showing you the evaluation of that.

>>106026942 (OP)
You could avoid this ambiguity if you used an RPN calculator.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=993dmoDdybs

>>>/g/lisp

>>106026942 (OP)
i see the future of this country is going to be a total shit show if you can't figure the anser to this out. zoomer arithmetics are astoundingly bad.

>>106027225
gnome

>>106029069
you stupid

>>106032239
If you're a schizo, you could answer it as -1

(3+5)-(7+2)

>>106026942 (OP)
the problem is there is no concrete ruleset for this problem.
its open to your interpretation

https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html

>>106030747
I would call bait if I didn't know many people don't actually understand the order of operations. These people cannot think past "this is the exact rule" and never question it or try to understand it.
This anon failed third grade maths and is bragging about it. The fucking state...

>÷ thread
congrats OP, so many retards took the bait

>>106026942 (OP)
6 / 2 * (2 + 1)
6 / 2 = 3
3 * (2 + 1)
2 + 1 = 3
3 * 3
9
All operations performed left to right. Pemdas or pedomas or bedmas or whatever you call it is a pile of bullshit. LEFT TO RIGHT. NO EXCEPTIONS.

>>106033075
>LEFT TO RIGHT. NO EXCEPTIONS.
Antisemitic. You should be performing operations from right to left.

Polish notation doesn't have this issue.
The problem was solved a long time ago but instead people prefer to stick to the inferior French notation.

>>106031764
the answer is correct though

>>106033608
Was for >>106031773

>>106033614
Yeah, that are examples of what the calculator plugin for krunner can do, and why it's just better not to skip the use of operators as you can do a lot of things with it but for that to work the parser might not imply all operators correctly.

So. if instead of writing 6/2(2+1) you write 6/2*(2+1) you will get the correct answer.

>>106033608
Both answers are correct btw, this shit can do a lot more than most built in calculators I've ever seen.

>>106033653
but krunner got the right answer there

>>106033703
afaik Krunner always gets the right answer unless you omit operators.

The x2 + 4*x -5 = 0 is also correct, this are not examples of krunner failing but examples of what Krunner can do.

What I want to say is that the parser is configured in a way where you can do really crazy stuff, so don't try to omit operators cause it does so many things it might be difficult for it to imply what operator was expected, meanwhile simple ass calculators have it easier as they don't need to take into account unknown variables, unit conversions and more

>>106033703
unless you are saying 1 is the correct answer to 6/2*(2+1) in that case you are wrong, the answer is 9

goated calculator gives you one of the answers and tells you it's ambiguous and to rephrase it

>>106033753
No, one is the correct answer

>>106033756
name of calculator?

>>106028207
You’re fucking retarded. How’d you fail out of elementary school level math?

>>106026942 (OP)
the google calculator at least shows you how it interprets the equation.
I was taught the donkey bridge "meneer van dale wacht op antwoord" which as you can see puts multiplication before division in which case the answer would be 6/(2*(1+3)).
Honestly if there's any room for doubt, not using parentheses is poor practice and should be discouraged. This is the same thing as those job interviews where they ask you to interpret weird looking unreadable C syntax. You're supposed to be able to figure it out but nobody actually writes code that way.

>>106034048
>6/(2*(1+3))
I meant 6/(2*(2+1)) of course

>>106033967
>failed
but I passed it though

>AI is already better at math than /g/oyim

>>106034210
the ai is wrong
you do (2+1)
then you do 3*3
after that you do 6/6

>>106026942 (OP)
The answer approaches infinity, but then suddenly, jumps to zero

>>106034225
nope, humans decided on the order of operations, you have to follow the rules otherwise you'll look like a fucking retard who can't do basic operations.
yes both are right, but the path to 9 is the way we settled on centuries ago, you're not clever by pointing this out, billions asked the question before and billions will ask it again and the only correct answer is that we chose to do left to right in case two operations had the same priority, as simple as, a toddler can understand this, why can't you?

>>106034225
Why are you reading right-to-left?

>>106027629
It really is the point, though. You're just a fag expecting free windows which is why you went with Plasma. Pewdiepie Linus showed everyone just _how and why_ to switch to Linux, using custom window manager/hyprland configs, thematic information display and everything. If you're not gonna rice Linux you're wasting the best it has to offer only to look for a workflow that was never as optimal to begin with. The only time moving windows around like it's 1995 makes sense is if you had a spacial interface, which is as good as dead on every up-to-date platform other than Haiku and helloSystem (which is an ode to everything between early Mac up into early OS X era like Tiger or so).

>>106029780
i'll bet it rectum

>>106028296
Plasma is a meme, KDE on the whole is fine. GNOME is worse than a meme, though, and it's logo is nsfw under sharia law, limiting international use even more than the troons in the background dilligently removing features for the next release. GNOME always feels cramped and limited. They built it on the Gimp ToolKit not because they loved graphics (they clearly hate it and want you to feel it) but because they want to treat their users like literal tied-up red-ball gimps.

saaaar do not redeem calculator saaar bloody behnchod bastard

>>106034524
I'm not

>>106028571
>type it into a calculator
>noo not like that

>>106034380
yes humans created the ORDER of operations so that makes the answer 1

why can't we all be friends?

>>106026942 (OP)
It works if you also add a multiplication sign between the two sides.
>>106027481
kek

>>106035264
I remember having to use calculators from a list of accepted devices because some would spit out inaccurate answers.

>question designed to be ambiguous to split people between solving 6/(2*(1+2)) or (6/2)*(1+2)
>/g/ gets it wrong either way by thinking multiplication always goes before division even if it means going right to left
dumbest motherfuckers online, i bet even the blacks on instagram comment sections would do better

>>106036058
well casio's are whats used in schools

>>106035264
Yeah, if you put an explicit multiplication in there the answer changes.

>>106038817
>>106038817
exactly, 9tards don't know the difference between explicit and implicit multiplication

>>106026942 (OP)
Should be 4.

>>106027232
Just remove the + operator.
It's just bloat.

>>106039394
Addition is the ONLY operator.

>>106039407
Yeah but subtraction is superior as you can add with by subtracting negatives.

Only need one symbol "-".

d-dont m-make fun of our k-k-k-calulator

>>106039426
That's just adding negatives.

>>106028161
WHAT THE FUCK I LEARNED BEDMAS IN SCHOOL

SINCE WHEN IS M BEFORE D

WHAT THE FUCK DID THEY UPDATE MATH?!

>>106033673
Why doesn't it support prefix and postfix notation?

*KRASHES*

>>106039703
see >>106029835