>shalom, my fellow white people. Your favorite based anti-woke chad Lunduke is here. I just want to say that digital id is a good thing and you should agree with me unless you're a radical leftist extremist.

who?

>>106030834 (OP)
Dead internet is 90% because real people don't want to contribute when the internet is so full of retards, it was pretty bad way before LLMs became widespread

>>106030834 (OP)
>Says that sites should check ID via driver's license that is temporarily stored just for the verification process
>Says this THE SAME DAY Tea leaked

Now this is the kind of hilarious (((coincidence))) that you can't just make up.

I'll take dead internet over ID-check dystopia any fucking day.
Being able to filter out the cruft and finding actual content/people is not impossible.

How would they enforce ID verification for every user on the internet? US can't even agree on ID verification on elections, because that somehow prevents poor from voting. And if US would get on board, how about India, or whole Africa?

>>106030834 (OP)
He deleted my comment. I got him mad.

Your ISP already verified you when you gave them your address and CC info, though?

>>106030984
What did you post? I thought about mentioning the Tea leak as an example of how shit WILL go wrong but
>logging in
Can't feel arsed enough to do so

>>106030989
One ISP connection is used by multiple people, so it's not helpful. What about connections at a workplace, or school?

fucking lmao

>>106030343

>>106031062
>One ISP connection is used by multiple people, so it's not helpful. What about connections at a workplace, or school?
What about them? People also share the same computer. Can you tell who is sitting at the keyboard at a given moment? Then how would you ID people individually? What about my dish washer? It connect to the internet on its own. Does it need an ID?

>>106031084
>needing a 'smart' dishwasher
You got bigger problems from the get-go already...

>>106031084
>What about my dish washer? It connect to the internet on its own. Does it need an ID?
you shouldn't talk about your wife like that

>>106030834 (OP)
the internet was dying before bots took over, because people are fake and gay attention seeking whores, nothing about that will change from ID, it will only make it easier for the gooberment to harrass you irl.

>>106030834 (OP)
I support ID verification for the internet because I want the internet to die. The internet was a colossal mistake.

>>106031095
This. Bots and algorithms are annoying, but at least that's just companies wanting you to buy their shit.
Giving power to the government is only going to end up screwing everyone.

All problems with the modern internet would go away if you just outlawed phones from connecting to it.

>>106031062
>One ISP connection is used by multiple people, so it's not helpful. What about connections at a workplace, or school?
The person/entity that signed the contract with the isp is the one responsible. It's a place with minors? Your responsibility to put on a parental control systems (that existed since ever) in place. It's a work environment or a school? Put a fucking vpn with logging and domain blacklist. This ID shit is a fucking waste of money put in place just to futher enshittificate the net.

>>106030834 (OP)
platforms will drop this like a hot potato once they see this start affecting ad revenue and AI. Meanwhile the rest of the internet will carry on as normal.

>>106031106
The only mistake was letting jews take it over and normal humans never gathering and gatekeeping kikes. Look at how demoralized you are just from having a few kikes breathing over your shoulder. Harden up because it’s going to get a whole lot worse before it gets better kikes don’t like the retards having nice things like a decent beef supply or functioning search engines or unkiked television and social media.

>>106031139
But anon, you are the jew, because you advocate for the internet.

>>106031122
Spot on. Parental control settings AREN'T HARD to set up. Lazy parents need to get off their asses.

>>106030834 (OP)
I saw this absolute faggot jew pushing this and throwing shade on Linux being a pedo bar. Fucking Hasbara agent bitch!

that is correct, some sort of real id check is something that would solve the dead internet and allow proper free speech
I can imagine some sort of government service that'd do it, but it's so complex to secure and prevent abuse in such a way that I could call someone a nigger while being anonymous, but verified as US citizen with no one finding that out that I don't see it happening in the next decade at least
IRS is literally feuding with SSA right no over just allowing login.gov logins to work because "they're not secure enough"

>>106030834 (OP)

>>106031155
You are a jew :/
You guys stick out like a sore thumb

>>106031183
Real id won’t do anything but make the internet less secure and gay as fuck

>>106031163
It's demential how fucking transparent are the obvious real motives for this ID scam, fucking governments were salivating for putting this shit in place. If the reason was "safety" all that was needed is to further codify the contractual responsibilities of both end user and isp so that the isp would offer dedicated solutions (parental control and vpn with logs and blacklist) easy to enable for the end user, and the end user having to sign a contract which clearly would warrant him directly responsible for not employing those instruments.

>>106031211
it doesn't have to be enforced, it doesn't have to be global
there just has to be a way to mark your post as a "real american" on social networks including 4chan
the right wing twitter jeets as well as AI bots would disappear immediately and reduce the spam significantly

>>106031207
Listen up, Steinberg, I want the internet to die so the masses actually go the fuck outside, and stop cucking themselves into degenerate cultural dead end behavior, and stop getting exposed to vectors for international globalist brainworms.
You want the internet to live so that...?

>>106031196
you are the guy who spamed child porn in the gnome matrix rooms?

>>106031062
>One ISP connection is used by multiple people, so it's not helpful
One account could be used by multiple people as well. So tying a one-time verification to an account doesn't work either.
I have a Gmail account from 2007 that recently asked me to verify my age. They don't trust that the person who created the account is the person who's currently using it.
Same with Steam. Got a Steam account from 2006, and that shit still gets those age verification questionnaires.

>>106031250
Ladies and gents this a jew take notes

>>106031248
You’re a retard that’s for sure

>>106031333
The most jew thing imaginable is dodging accountability for your opinions. So why do you want the internet to live?

>>106031163
Some people are pretty dense about using their own technology... I hate to say it buy maybe making an app mandatory to setup a (consumer) router is the way to go, that way the device registered to the network admin(s) (call it a parent/adult account to make it obvious), ping that device every time a new device wants to use the network, parent account can then set their permissions or it defaults to "safe" mode.

Make that mandatory for all new routers sold in the country. Thats half of the problem solved immediately.

>>106031360
Jew boi is seething ^_^

>>106031375
Yes, I agree you're seething kek
Anyway, the internet's gonna die, Americans will go outside and fuck women again, manufacturing will return, and Klaus's globalist great society won't have direct dopamine pathways into peoples' brains anymore.

>>106030834 (OP)
damn, anti-linux anti-foss jew is now advocating for digital id? color me surprised

>>106030975
Shh! Stop noticing! It's not like this shit will be only put in places where the infrastructure allows it and high trust population there will accept it, like it's not a way to further atomize those communities and entice them in self censoring if(when) something humongously draconian and dangerous is going to happened to them. Afterlall the beta tes- ..i mean, the greenpass already demonstrated its utility irl not long ago.

>>106031234
The governments always want digital ID. They wanted it during the viruse scam. They want it for controlling the import of people ("asylum"). In Liechtenstein you need a digital ID for paying VAT https://www.llv.li/de/news/portalpflicht-bei-der-mehrwertsteuer-ab-januar-2025-emwst

>>106031196
kek

>>106030919
>Being able to filter out the cruft and finding actual content/people is not impossible.
How about human-verification instead of identity verification?
Is there a way to do it without privacy issues?
Visit kiosk and have random monthly token generated?

>>106030975
>US can't even agree on ID verification on elections, because that somehow prevents poor from voting.
KEK, And even if they somehow agreed on the ID to vote it would still cause no problems because you can't blackmail someone because of their vote.
But internet ID, on the other hand, can and will be used against people, so free speech will die, and every single wrong thought could cost your life, so NOPE.