Like why is everyone shipping flash drives with the exFAT shit is is literally the worst FS imaginable that corrupts all the time!

NTFS is better and has the same scope.

>>106035532 (OP)
Exfat works on every os without reformatting

>>106035532 (OP)
NTFS permissions are utterly cancerous for portable drives.

I wish Microsoft had come up with a filesystem flag to turn off permissions. Back in the day I got so tired of NTFS permissions that I hacked ntfs.sys to disable permissions completely.

>>106035532 (OP)
>when a /v/tard makes a /g/ thread

>>106035532 (OP)
Use XFS or btfo.

>>106035604
>Exfat works on every os
NTFS works on Linux and windows.
This is all that matters

>Exfat works on every os
Name a OS where NTFS is not recognized
[PRO tip anything apple is IRRELEVANT]

Exfat is pure garbage.

>>106035715
>NTFS permissions are utterly cancerous for portable drives.
As oppressed to unix shit....
That literally can not exist in a world with more then 1 computer....

Try moving a EXT4 drive from one system to another and see what happens.

>OWNED by user 3462 (who does not exist on this system)

>>106036094
>NTFS works on Linux and windows.
It doesn't, really. Yes, read and write on Linux, but as soon as something like Linux symlinks comes up, Linux NTFS driver can't handle it.
>OS where NTFS is not recognized
>[PRO tip anything apple is IRRELEVANT]
OS X recognizes it OOTB tho, read-only.
So I can't use it on Linux. Can't use it on a Mac. Can't plug in a flash drive to a PS4 to install pirated PKGs. Can't install pirated .nsw onto a Switch. Can't even watch my movies on a smart TV.

>>106036360
What do you mean?

>>106036678
He didn't know NTFS added symlinks

>>106035852
that's the way for performance
/thread

>>106035532 (OP)
flash drives?
then you should actually use F2FS

>>106036360
>symlinks
Imagine using symlinks.
Imagine using symlinks acros multiple file systems.
Imagine using symlinks acros multiple file systems where one is NTFS.
Any other retarded ideas?

>Can't plug in a flash drive to a PS4
????
Who plugs things into a PS4? Pro tip your SNES also will not accept a flash drive!

>>106036360
>Can't even watch my movies on a smart TV.
And this is a good thing.
Imagine owning a smart TV.
Imagine watching things on a smart TV.
Imagine plugging anything into a smart TV!

You really have a fetish to send all the movies you pirate to the FBI!

>>106037250
>F2FS
HUH?

>F2FS
WOW that obscure thing people did talk about for flash!

>F2FS
Is anyone formatting (IN THE FACTORY) flash drives with this?
Can anything even read it?
Can anything even format to this shit?

Either way here is exFAT AKA FAT 64 a extended FAT file system originally made in the 1980s for floppy discs!

>>106037250
>F2FS
Lets see:
>Max volume size 16 TB
Dead on arrival!
> 64 TB with 16K blocks
Dead on arrival!

>Max filename length 255 bytes
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAH
Laughing in Linux and Windows 10++ leting you do more.
Dead on arrival!

>Date resolution 1 ns
Did people pull these ideas out of a hat?
>Attributes POSIX
AHAHAHAH AHAHAHAH POSIX!

Jesus Christ for flash drives POSIX!
No retards POSIX literally is build on the idea that there is only 1 (ONE) computer and not more in the world it literally can not handle a world with more then 1 computer.

Also POSIC literally and I mean literally can not handle flash drives or external HDDs or CDs or anything that is plugged into it that is not blank.

YOu retards have no idea. Get 2 linux computers and format a flash drive to EXT4 or something now write files and plug into the other linux computer see what the attributes say.

You retards understand that in a world of multiple computers the idea of a USER and a groups literally make no fucken sense whatsoever?!

Like the chmod shit is literally garbage now because the OS was not made with this as a thing that can happen!
POSIX/Linux/Unix do not work if there are more then 1 computer in the world!!!

Unix weenies every time!

What happened to ReFS?

>>106035715
Would never trust exFat on portable drives. Used one for my old laptop, I accidentally bumped/moved the drive and drive disconnected then reconnected without warning and turned all my files into read only with no way(that I knew of) to turn them back and had to copy everything over to a new drive and format the old one. Yeah it was shitty USB header on the laptop fault but the fact that this only happens with exFat and not NTFS turned my against exFat. It got to the point where I could even repeat the game incident on different external drives. If my NTFS drive disconnects abruptly, its no big deal and works as usual.

Ever since I never trusted exFat again unless someone else can tell me what happened.

Is NTFS slow with Linux or is that 20 years out of date info?

>>106035532 (OP)
Because ntfs-3g has a long, proud history of destroying every NTFS it can see. This wasn't that much of a problem on macOS, as their bundled version is read-only by default - but it's been an absolute disaster for freetards, only recently mitigated by the inclusion of the (far better and less buggy) Paragon NTFS driver.

>>106040370
honestly not really, the paragon ntfs aka ntfs3 driver is just as broken, don't ask me how i know

>>106040101
Not just Troonix, most programs ported from Troonix, too.
The technical reason is that NTFS stores tons of metadata that's costly to retrieve, but the POSIX stat() call needs, so file enumeration performance is a complete disaster on Troonix.
On Windows, you use the far more intelligent Find[First|Next]File[Ex]() call, and native software has done that for decades, but third-rate Troonix ports (that is, nearly all of them) still call stat() on a loop.
This is why freetards are always pretending that (for example) Windows ports of git are any sort of FS performance benchmark: they can act like it's an apples-to-apples comparison ("hurrdurr its compiled from the same code") and low IQs (that is, /g/ and other troons) eat it up because they're stupid.

>>106040399
I'm simply going by the massive drop in
>my windows drive destroyed itself hurrdurr winblows sux
>yes i dual boot troonix how did you know
posts in /fwt/ over the last couple of years.

>>106035532 (OP)
exFAT is just FAT32 without 4 GB file size limit.
If you unplug the flash drive while it's writing or reading it might corrupt. What are you expecting from a file system?