Why does it make ((( Red Hat shills ))) seethe?

>>106111701 (OP)
nobody is shilling red hat or arch you're just listening to the voices from the walls bro

>>106111701 (OP)
pacman

>>106111701 (OP)
Because its the old AOL logo?

>>106111701 (OP)
every systemd distro is a red hat distro

>>106112494
>partial update
>shits itself
I don't think anyone's jealous of that

>>106112620
truf

>>106112692
I have been using Arch for over ten years and I never had anything break from doing -Syu.

But I had plenty of RHEL and offshoot distros at work and home, fail from dnf update.

i once had an old system running arch, left it alone, powered off for a few years
when i booted it up again and tried to update i got some keyring error and the thing literally could not update itself

>>106112879
looks like a (you) problem.

>>106111701 (OP)
Red Hat users are recovering Windows addicts. They haven't learned to completely let go of spyware yet. So they love Red Hat like a fat kid loves sugar-free cake.

There would be no Red Hat without Arch users. So, they should be thankful to us for keeping it going. If we decide to stop using Arch, Red Hat will die.

>>106112984
what exactly did i do wrong here?
i committed the sin of not using the system?

>>106111701 (OP)
IBM doesn't get to spy on Arch users so they go in full force to smear it.

>>106111701 (OP)
It doesn't. Arch is a simple distribution (as in they don't care about anything besides installing upstream packages) that focus on a single architecture and does not give a damn about licensing, if a package has non foss compatible licenses, they create the pkgbuild and license it instead.
Fedora is a distro that complies within US Laws and enforces an strict foss policy in their official repos (RPM and Flatpak) that support four architectures. Both are meant for different things, Fedora likes to push new packages and solutions with multiple ISOs meant for specialized tasks or users, they also have an Everything ISO where you can install your shit as if you were using Arch.
While Arch like to push upstream packages, and let the user decide on everything. Simple as that.
Both are good distros, meant for different purposes, no need to seethe at the other.
>But Arch is supported in other architectures
Those are not official distros, many Arch users ignore Arch is x86_64 only.

I use arch btw

>>106112494
Does it still shit itself if you don't run Syu for a few weeks?

>>106112692
>partial update
use case?
>uh, well you see, I
that's what I thought

>>106111701 (OP)
oops wrong image

>arch conforms with all redhat standards
Why would redhat seethe? Arch is basically a vassal of redhat.
Now artix, devuan, void, etc. Those make redhat seethe.

>>106118114
I've never had this issue. If I don't update for a while I do have to run Syu so the package stuff syncs and I can install packages again but nothing has really broken for me even on systems where I didn't bother to upgrade for a year.

>>106118518
>Community distros make Red Hat seethe
kek no, Oracle and CiQ are the ones making Red Hat seethe, not community distros who may use or not their standards, kek, what company do you know uses Devuan, artix or void for deploying server infrastructure at data centers? If it steal them market share an sales, sure, community distros don't do that, it's expensive as fuck to do so, you can try it.

>>106113030
holy delusional

>>106111701 (OP)
They discovered another malware package recently on the AUR. It's a trash distro.

>>106112751
well thats a lie
Every single arch install got fucked when they had the signing key fiasco a couple years ago
And theyve borked the python update more than once. This one isnt unique to arch, though. It happens on a lot of distros

>>106112879
>>106112984
Yeah that was a huge problem. They added some random zoomer dev and used his brand new signing key on a bunch of packages which prevented everyone from pulling them with pacman. Including arch-keyring, the package which would have loaded his key, lmao. They somehow tried to blame the users for this

>>106120254
topkek
this is why i'm never using arch again

>>106111701 (OP)
it doesn't. completely different use cases. no one who runs red hat would touch arch in a production environment.

>>106120841
>no one would touch arch in a production environment
This is true.

>>106120810
yeah i just use debian now. Theres not much benefit to bleeding edge packages for a typical user. I do like pacman and the AUR but its not worth the baggage that comes with it.

>>106121637
don't be a retard and you won't have baggage

>>106121119
I do

>>106121735
gaslighting your own former users over your own mistakes is hardly going to win them back

>>106121837
>former
good, arch is for advanced linux users and not for simpletons like yourself

>>106121856
Might as well just skip ahead to where you call me an incel or racist or something

>>106121894
sir this isn't reddit