Anonymous
8/2/2025, 7:08:37 PM No.106118058
https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/3320544/uk-defends-online-safety-act-after-x-claims-it-threatens-free-speech?module=latest&pgtype=homepage
>“The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content." -Peter Kyle
British non-violence is consent to lose their freedom of expression. It has been about a week since the Online Safety Act came into effect and there have been no bombings, shootings, riots, assassinations, or maiming of any of the people responsible for creating or enforcing the Act. We should work to educate the public about technological workarounds, but at a certain point you have to push back against this kind of fascist bullshit with violence. This is an extremely dangerous situation for all of us since UK law can set precedent in all countries that use Common Law.
>“Indeed, it could occasionally seem that support for the armed struggle was more fervent in Boston or Chicago than it was in Belfast or Derry. The romantic idyll of a revolutionary movement is easier to sustain when there is no danger that one's own family members might get blown to pieces on a trip to the grocery store. Some people in Ireland looked askance at the "plastic Paddies" who urged bloody war in Ulster from the safe distance of America.” ― Patrick Radden Keefe, Say Nothing: A True Story of Murder and Memory in Northern Ireland
>“The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content." -Peter Kyle
British non-violence is consent to lose their freedom of expression. It has been about a week since the Online Safety Act came into effect and there have been no bombings, shootings, riots, assassinations, or maiming of any of the people responsible for creating or enforcing the Act. We should work to educate the public about technological workarounds, but at a certain point you have to push back against this kind of fascist bullshit with violence. This is an extremely dangerous situation for all of us since UK law can set precedent in all countries that use Common Law.
>“Indeed, it could occasionally seem that support for the armed struggle was more fervent in Boston or Chicago than it was in Belfast or Derry. The romantic idyll of a revolutionary movement is easier to sustain when there is no danger that one's own family members might get blown to pieces on a trip to the grocery store. Some people in Ireland looked askance at the "plastic Paddies" who urged bloody war in Ulster from the safe distance of America.” ― Patrick Radden Keefe, Say Nothing: A True Story of Murder and Memory in Northern Ireland
Replies:
