It's been nearly FOUR months and he is YET to reply.

>>106130762 (OP)
>REEEEEEE STAHP DISLIKING THINGS I LIEK!!!!!
/g/ is truly the most autistic board on 4chan.

>>106130827
His logic is entirely flawed.

The solution he recommends is literally centralised and run by banks.

>>106130834
Yeah but bitcoin wont help get more funding for GNU projects which means no money for him which means he can't pay prostitutes to eat his toe jam.
Happy?

>>106130834
Stallman doesn't care, he cares more about taxes being paid. He's a socialist.

>>106130762 (OP)
this is the same guy who doesn't know how to update his own website and has unpaid volunteers do it for him

Crypto doesnt have an actual use case for most people.
The ability to reverse transactions is a positive for the average person when you are dealing with shit like credit card skimmers and such.

>>106130908
>The ability to reverse transactions is a positive for the average person when you are dealing with shit like credit card skimmers and such.

Study game theory, retard!

>>106130869
Makes sense.

>>106130886
I thought he was a Commie?

>>106130897
Based?

>>106130762 (OP)
>>106130774
picrel: OP blowing up Richard GODman's mailbox with impotence-fueled copes regarding the most recent shitcoin news

>>106131050
Bitcoin can't be rugpulled

>>106130921
how is he wrong
99% of the cryptoverse is now a 'speculative investment' aka a scam. all exchanges are scams, all altcoins are scams. basically the only good use of crypto is dodging capital controls which is irrelevant to most of humanity, which doesn't have enough capital to even worry about that problem. And the ones who do are mostly interested in using that capital to bribe politicians to make your life worse.

Not even that great for moneylaundering or buying drugs anymore due to how exchanges have developed and how many 'crypto' services exclusively transact through them now.

>>106130921
>Study game theory, retard!
How does that relate to my point about transaction reversal?

>>106130908
It would have a use case if it was fast and convenient and cheap. But it's slow, inconvenient, and expensive.

>>106131212
>99% of the cryptoverse is now a 'speculative investment' aka a scam

You don't have to buy, moron. You can evaluate the code.

>all exchanges are scams

Exchanges are centralised.

>all altcoins are scams.

Again, you don't have to buy them.

And the only way you know they are a scam is because of the public blockchain data.

Do you realise how often banks scam people? Or scam taxes for bailouts?

>basically the only good use of crypto is dodging capital controls which is irrelevant to most of humanity

Moron, Half the globe has zero access to banking or mobile banking apps.

>Not even that great for moneylaundering or buying drugs anymore due to how exchanges have developed and how many 'crypto' services exclusively transact through them now.

Ever heard of Monero?

>>106131247
>It would have a use case if it was fast and convenient and cheap. But it's slow, inconvenient, and expensive.

False.

>>106131254
>half of the world has zero access to banking or mobile banking
that half of the world has no capital so it's irrelevant. i actually prefer that many of these people (mostly the ~800 million Indians) remain poor and disconnected from any global systems.
Monero is the only altcoin that i don't think is worthless. don't get me wrong, i was early into crypto but I've become very disillusioned with what it has become.

>>106131336
>that half of the world has no capital so it's irrelevant

Retard opinion.

If they have no money, they come to foreign countries.

You are one low iq retard.

>>106130834
Nigga nobody normal gives a shit that someone disagrees with you for [reasons]. This is why you're unemployed.

>>106131262
>False.
What do you mean? Could yo uelaborate?

>>106131423
1. It is extremely fast and cheap on blockchains like Solana
2. Ethereum is not as expensive as it used to be

You are like someone complaining about the Apple II not being like a modern day MacBook Pro.

>>106130774
>>106130762 (OP)
He's doing the anti-crypto because thats what liberals ideology is adopting. Why? Because "tech bros."

RMS has functioning lost his mind years ago during the Biden admin

>>106131078
Yes it can retard you don’t think the piggies have a controlling share already? There are people getting so much free helicopter money it’s impossible to prevent a monopoly in anything, crypto makes it easy to hide in a bunch of shell companies.
Also crypto isn’t some magic asset that will never experience a bear market. You’re a bunch of amateurs that got lucky and have never experienced hard times.

>>106131474
Direction brained retards will never have a coherent argument

use case for crypto?
it's very easy to hijack crypto network with enough compute power. for example, something like meta or microsoft could easily manipulate bitcoin network. what are going to do then?
this is just too much unrealiable system.

>>106131474
Same with forcing people to take proprietary vaccines created and funded by bill gates money for a virus that was created and funded by bill gates money.

>>106131254
>You don't have to buy, moron. You can evaluate the code.
>>106131254
>Again, you don't have to buy them.
>And the only way you know they are a scam is because of the public blockchain data.
>Do you realise how often banks scam people? Or scam taxes for bailouts?
Most people are not tech savvy and are not capable of auditing code.

>>106131363
If they have money they come here idiot. Why do you think most immigrants to the US are high caste? why does the average Indian have a higher income than the average white? turdies with no money can't buy a ticket here and can't afford to navigate the immigration system.

liquidity in crypto is provided by institutional investors. they have an outsized influence on the price of major assets and even shitcoins. firms like jane street and jump trading effectively control the bid-ask spreads, volatility tends to widen those spreads, which increases profit per trade as long as they can hedge and manage risk properly. but for everyday users, high volatility makes these currencies impractical to hold or use. cryptocurrencies are decentralized at the protocol level, but in practice their price is determined by large firms.

>>106130921
>Study game theory, retard!
I have, now what the fuck are you even saying? There's no obvious and unambiguous connection between the two.
Are you just trying to get me to make up your own argument for you?

>>106131460
its still inconvenient for average use.
its current usecase is a stock without any underlying company

>>106131673
>what is money pooling

>>106131623
>Most people are not tech savvy and are not capable of auditing code.
Natural selection.

>>106131673
Cope. The highest caste and the lowest stay there.

The midwits move to the USA.

>>106131751
If you actually studied game theory, you would figure out that over time, fraud would get to zero because improvements would be made to ensure it doesn't occur in a non-reversible system.

>>106131764
Look into Tokenised Stocks, buddy.

But he's right though. Where are you going to get your XMR and where are you going to sell it? The government can shut off your internet and you will have zero access to your funds. They already have KYC EVERYWHERE. Your USD will be tracked because buying $1,000+ will be legally recorded.

>>106131623
>everything should be closed source because most people can't read the source code anyways
What a stupid take.

>>106132321
>If you actually studied game theory, you would figure out that over time, fraud would get to zero because improvements would be made to ensure it doesn't occur in a non-reversible system.
I could even more plausibly picture a system where fraud goes to zero because no one chooses to participate in a system riddled with fraud.
It's no less game theory to make "deciding to play the game in the first place" a choice that people can make.
There are also less-extreme systemic breakdowns than complete non-participation. For example, a market where credit no longer exists (zero trust!) and all transactions are done with cash-on-hand for products-on-hand. Which I'm sure you'll claim is a great thing! But thousands of years of economic history shows that the absence of credit is negatively correlated with economic growth (c.f. usury laws and whether they were actually enforced or not by European jurisdictions).

good morning sir