what are some of the most important open source softwares maintained by a small group of autists

>>106131793 (OP)
qemu
ffmpeg

>>106131793 (OP)
liblzma

>>106131793 (OP)
sqlite
only 3 autists and they don't accept contributions

>>106131793 (OP)
void linux

>>106131793 (OP)
asahi linux
if that one troon ropes it's ogre for graphics on apple's arm devices

>>106132254
Lmao

>>106131793 (OP)
Linux kernel
Bitcoin
Monero
Ruby/Ruby on Rails
FastAPI
Most of the internet's infrastructure

>>106131840
>they don't accept contributions
based.

xfce

>>106132319
I think Monero is a meme :/
Bitcoin seems to tick every box including anonymity. Lightning is as anonymous as it gets. Any reason why Monero gets mentioned?

>>106133026
>Lightning is as anonymous as it gets
It isn't. It's better than using mainchain but your IP can still be tracked if you're not using Tor. Monero is anonymous by default and its privacy features are(so far) unbeatable.

>>106133026
>>Bitcoin seems to tick every box including anonymity. Lightning is as anonymous as it gets. Any reason why Monero gets mentioned?
Layer 2 solutions are privacy as an afterthought and architecturally unsound. Monero does privacy the right way, by default at the protocol layer. Bitcoin is obsolete tech that nobody actually uses anymore.

>>106133329
the hell is this, black market site?

>>106133363
>the hell is this, black market site?
Just one of the growing number of Monero-only darknet markets out there.

>>106133329
>>106133324
Maybe, but I don’t see Monero becoming more than a niche thing. Since it has no maximum block size, if Monero were to become as used as Bitcoin, the chain would grow to proportions that would make running personal nodes a fantasy. I think we’re looking at around 100TB if Monero had the same market cap as Bitcoin. Even pruned nodes would be unfeasible.

>>106133617
>Maybe, but I don’t see Monero becoming more than a niche thing. Since it has no maximum block size, if Monero were to become as used as Bitcoin, the chain would grow to proportions that would make running personal nodes a fantasy. I think we’re looking at around 100TB if Monero had the same market cap as Bitcoin. Even pruned nodes would be unfeasible.
This erroneously assumes no future optimizations. Blockchain scaling solutions like recursive ZK state compression are already on the horizon. Or perhaps XMR payment channels will also become a thing. https://github.com/grease-xmr/grease

>>106131793 (OP)
Vim and pretty much any text editor that's actually good.

>>106133617
>Monero becoming more than a niche thing
That's a feature, not a bug. Monero was designed to be used in grey and black markets, not by the average normie.

>if Monero were to become as used as Bitcoin, the chain would grow to proportions that would make running personal nodes a fantasy
That's a valid concern, let's hope for the best.

>>106133732
In theory Lightning is chain agnostic, so maybe. But I don’t think future optimizations will offer much, on the contrary, it’s getting worse in this respect if ring size is increased again. Or Monero would have to abandon RingCT altogether.

>>106133973
Monero is ditching ringsigs for membership proofs. Look into FCMP++. It is amazing

kicad, gnuradio, plotutils off the top of my head.

>>106131793 (OP)
7zip

>>106134325
That’s good and not so good. It’s a major change and something that’s supposed to be money shouldn’t change so significantly every so often. This is why a lot of people prefer Bitcoin , it’s been very stable in time. Hard forks are not trivial and they may break something or introduce a plethora of critical bugs. I shouldn’t have to sweat buckets with every Monero release

>>106131840
Based.
https://sqlite.org/codeofethics.html

>>106134733
> Pray for your enemies in the love of Christ.
And then send them to him.

>>106134799
Banned for violating our CoC with your un-Christian wrongthink.

>>106131793 (OP)
VLC

>>106133973
>But I don’t think future optimizations will offer much, on the contrary,
Of course they will, an innovations like ZK compression is an absolute game changer. You could in theory validate the state of an entire blockchain with a single proof that's well bellow 1MB in size.

>>106134696
>That’s good and not so good. It’s a major change and something that’s supposed to be money shouldn’t change so significantly every so often.
Crypto is software. Software that hardly or never updates becomes obsolete as the operating environment changes over time. If Bitcoin had actually implemented all proposed privacy upgrades then Monero wouldn't have been able to come along and offer something new and improved to a needy market.

>This is why a lot of people prefer Bitcoin
People don't actually use Bitcoin as currency anymore. Too slow, too expensive, too transparent.

>Hard forks are not trivial and they may break something or introduce a plethora of critical bugs. I shouldn’t have to sweat buckets with every Monero release
That's fine, you can stick with the coin that doesn't evolve and can't adapt to new challenges.

>>106131793 (OP)
Data mining thread
Trannies looking to capture and fuck up software alert