>>106134093Amazing. I was just searching on the archive for this word and got zero results, only to have it show up here immediately.
>>106134054 (OP)Based on your photo I'd go for WOLED but I honestly have no clue
In theory QD oled is better but Samsung botched the display driver in the S95F leaving the woled LG G5 the current best panel on the market which I hate because fuck LG, I refuse to give them another cent.
oled was invented by the japanese in the 80s but was abandoned because it was so shit until gooks dug it out the trashcan 40 years later
I wonder where we'd be right now had they not abandoned surface conduction electron emitter display tech.
>>106134054 (OP)There is no debate. It's quite simple. The brighter the panel gets, the more washed out the color becomes. QD OLED fixes this
The perfect display would be a small box filled with nanites that dynamically create the scene like a moving diorama
qd oled is so bad samsung started selling oled tvs with woled panels
i went with woled for my tv
>>106134079Seriously though why can't they just make CRTs but thin
>>106134054 (OP)While quantum dots are cool and all, the retarded purple tint from ambient lighting is because of them. It's less cursed than woled I guess.
>>106135974they did. it got patent trolled to death
>>106135974Because there's no market for it. Vast majority of consumers value resolution and brightness the most. Something CRTs were never particularly great at. I can't imagine CRT technology with HDR support. They already were getting hot as hell and consumed way too much electricity just hitting SDR levels of brightness. Shit even OLED getting pretty warm at 55".
>>106135239this expect them to switch to miniled after japs go full microled
>>106135316Bright highlights tend to be white anyway. It's brighter when it matters.
wake me up wen we get microled with lightfields
>>106134054 (OP)Let me guess OP, you prefer bottom emission
>>106134140Lots of synchronicity happening today
>>106135974They're fundamentally flawed.
>300:1 effective contrastlmao
>plasma>150nits max brightnesslmao
I buy the thing that looks best to me within my budget.
I donโt sit around debating and suffering from either buyers remorse or choice paralysis like a nerd loser.
>>106139685>150nits max brightnessaverage ABL'd OLED brightess
4df8
md5: c84ec8c0071aecee26c5a0341ddf25a7
๐
>>106139685Nit? What the fuck is a nit? My late model plasma looks great.
>>106136090This would have had the same issues as LCD I guarantee
>>106140700It's worse on OLED because the peak brightness is constantly fluctuating depending on how much of the screen is lit up
What a fucking joke technology
>>106142488it wouldn't and several brands made some form of this in the later days of high end crts. Bang and Olufsson imho made some of the nicest ones but im sure Philips must've done one as well.