Curious, if AI is so expensive to maintain, and even the biggest companies like OpenAI and Google need more money, why don't they just lift the nsfw restrictions?
Sex sells, and they'd only make a lot more money if people could treat their LLM's like SCP-1004

>>106136405 (OP)
They would make magnitudes more grifting the government taxpayers than they do from coomers. If they could make more money selling smut to pickled brain gooners, then the government would make them pay exorbinant amounts so they could get their piece of the pie, which they get through kickbacks when they control the money and deny perverts in a false act of piety.

>>106136423
So it's more profitable to not appeal to more people? That doesn't make much sense.

>>106136436
Well, if you look at it like ``all the people are paying taxes'' then you make more by sucking the government teat, as opposed to only the handful who are desperate enough to take their sex life in their own hands. Billions vs Millions.

>>106136469
>>106136423
This

Also, grok exists which is trying to tap the gooner market

>>106136405 (OP)
Some parts of the west are still puritan so it's safer to just ban it entirely. Enabling coomers hurts their brand image and can potentially lead to lawsuits regarding you know what.

>>106136405 (OP)
they cant appeal to gooners because all AI companies get their training data from a single megacorp, i forgot the name but thats why all AIs sound the same and have the same morals

>After approximately 100 straight hours of viewing pornography on SCP-1004, even the most 'normal' of viewers will display an interest in scatology play, the torture and murder of living beings, bestiality, pedophilia, and combinations of the previous. The deadening of reactivity to sexual gratification will encourage them to either seek out such things with other people, or to mutilate themselves and their genitalia.

maybe not the most compelling comparison

>>106136488
>>106136507
Well, as many figures like Sam Altman have said, the ceiling is near. Money is being burned at a rate greater than anything before. They need more data and dosh, there is only so much.

So that said, the company that is NOT so pussy will then lead the AI race. It's really that simple.

This extends beyond nsfw coomer gooner slop btw. It's been proven that neutering and lobotomizing your LLM quite literally makes it dumber.


>>106136542
It's a comedic exaggeration of course

>>106136405 (OP)
The second they even imply nsfw is allowed Visa and Mastercard will swoop in and threaten to ban them off of the global credit cadd system, so they cant.

>>106136606
Until Visa and Mastercard are put on the long overdue leash.
What business did a private sector have with what I do with my own money anyway? Fuck right on off.

>>106136405 (OP)
>Curious, if AI is so expensive to maintain, and even the biggest companies like OpenAI and Google need more money, why don't they just lift the nsfw restrictions?
because public image is still important

>>106136507
Scale AI?

>>106136542
>What do you want to see?
>"I'd rather feel"

>>106136627
Just make your own credit card company lol.

>>106136627
>What business did a private sector have with what I do with my own money anyway
freedom ain't free you commie

>>106136423
>Y-Y-Yeah i-it w-wouldn't s-s-sell anyways!
Shut the fuck up and kill yourself kike.

>>106136405 (OP)
because that isn't advertiser-friendly, anon. they want to make money with "AI" and nothing else.

>>106136405 (OP)
Because they lose more money on inference then on training. Their business model isn’t unsustainable, it’s straight up retarded. They set the price of everything too low and now they have no idea how to raise it. So for them the less people use it the better.

>>106136507
You're correct that they ask use much the same training weights but you're incorrect about what that contain, they're full of nsfw smut but most system prompts try as hard as possible to block that from coming up in results. It used to be very easy to trick GPT into ignoring the guidelines and engaging in sex rp but they've progressively made it more difficult. The exception is Grok that doesn't really bother at all trying to censor their LLM and have event went as far as to pander directly to coommers

>>106140778
>>106136478
>grok le uncensored

bump

>>106136542
>SCP
Is that shit still alive?

>>106136405 (OP)
I think we'd be looking at a civilization ending catastrophe if this actually happened. Total birthrate collapse. Power would either become nearly unaffordable or the environment would rapidly collapse from the insane resource exploitation and power consumption. Society would dry up as everyone retreats into a hedonistic pleasure matrix. And I'm pretty sure the government already told them in no uncertain terms that this will not be allowed to happen.

>>106136423
Why offer any service at all in that case

>>106144140
Normies arent going to settle for anything less than a literal replicant-tier sex bot. I don’t even think most anons are capable of enjoying text based cooming.