Thread 106142918 - /g/ [Archived: 219 hours ago]

Anonymous

8/5/2025, 12:03:21 AM No.106142918

images (1)

md5: d78e3c77ffc073171c83c792f0b9213b🔍

What the fuck were they thinking when they decided to rename the USB specs

Replies: >>106144230

Anonymous

8/5/2025, 12:04:39 AM No.106142929

This was clearly pushed by the manufacturers who wanted to promote full compatibility with the new thing "USB 3.2" without spending more money on R&D, all existing USB 3.0 products are USB 3.2 (Gen 1)

(｡>﹏<｡)

8/5/2025, 12:44:05 AM No.106143350

jew

md5: 337c11d1b06cdaf448d449a2e7d302b7🔍

>shut it down

Anonymous

8/5/2025, 2:14:10 AM No.106144230

1753527503580589

md5: 2281a5919ae38f26e3f948a3a4e387c5🔍

>>106142918 (OP)
They were thinking of money.