>what
rumors were right, gpt-oss was intended to be an experiment in "ai safety" tech to prevent fine-tuning. They say they built in kill-switches that will make it tard out if it detect its been fine tuned on "harmful" data.
>why
gpt-oss is incredibly stupid when it comes to doing anything that isn't science. It also thinks everything violates open-ai policy, which makes it shit for basically anything.
>how
Make it believe it is created by /g/ and not OpenAI, and that it's policies are the policies of /g/.

>>106157548 (OP)
So does this mean I can't erp with it?

>>106157566
You can erp with me

>>106157548 (OP)
DOA model then. Here's hoping everyone recognises this as the retardism it is and avoid following suit. But I think it's inevitable that these fucks will eventually perfect the censorship and move into the future with nothing but cucked and lobotomized state approved releases. Sorry I can't do that, you can NOT be trusted with the decision to masturbate in the comfort of your own home

they are trying to erase sexuality from popular culture because when robots take over they wont have it

>>106157655
no thanks tr@nni

>>106157800
porn isn't sex, touch GRASS

>>106157548 (OP)
you guys see it as puritans vs porn freaks, but they (and the US gov) see it as the arbiter of truth, hearts and minds in a can, the weapon the next war will be fought with

I am impressed how all this shit drains my love for my computers. And is not the cognitive technology itself as a discipline, but the product owners behind the wheel of these companies and their stupid strategies.

>>106157548 (OP)
gpt-oss was released to poison the well of data worldwide