Large data providers can't actually provide all users with unique retrievals. That's why theu don't use Oracle.

"the algorithm" 's purpose is to keep you in Plato's Cave - buy for financial reasons (the men in Plato's cave typically are chained slaves). the financial reason is serving a stream (one to many) is vastly easier.

what the algorithm does is it tries to hack your mind into you bahaviorally staying on the "local channels" (there is also regionalization).
this is why users will find themselves garnering bespoke attention from yt /x for being very long tail, they manually have to see if you are a scraper bot or not.

anyway, the dream:
>join the conversation

the reality:
>view/read slop (sticky content) because computers and networks are SLOW.

an equal portion of freedom of speech is freedom of reach. in thr soviet union you were free to curse Khrushchev in the shower.

we aren't free.

x/yt are just TEEEVEEE

>>106167222 (OP)
>theu
they*

>>106167222 (OP)
>- buy for financial
but*

>>106167222 (OP)
>bahaviorally
behaviorally*

>>106167222 (OP)
>thr
the*

>>106167222 (OP)
I treat youtube like a TV, but I fourchan is the closest I get to interacting with the world in a social way. I only clicked on your discussion because Many to Many didn't make sense and I wanted to know what the heck you were talking about. Perhaps you mean Much to Many? Anyhoo, the end is nigh.

>>106167306
thanks for the biography, zoomie. learn to type to ai or a search engine next time.

to be clear about what yt, x, fb can't do - are incapable of

they can't map their concurrent userbase to totally random records (eg videos, posts, whatwver the content).

it's not within their capability. it's a caching stage and storage retrieval problem.

i have experienced it myself, trying to play some long tail videos. stuttering 720p playback (meanwhile i can run two 4k videos of slop off yt). this happens less, so i guess they changed the steucture. or maybe i have sloppier tastes now. they still have to have tiered data storage levels.

in database design this is a basic pattern. a many to many is a relationship which implies an associative entity. ie a table between the two. say

many USER watch many VIDEO

so the WATCH table had user_id and video_id. and potentially is as big as the product of them.

Investors should sue, because the tech wasn't actually there. impossible tech that never existed. a huhe scam.

Many retards disparage 4chan and call it dead. This is the only social media site that doesn't use an algorithm, so this place is still at the top of the pile of shit that is the internet.

>>106167585
yep it's much easier to escape slop on chans.

>>106167675
What I hate most about twitter and Reddit interactions is that all replies are threaded. So if you have 2 faggots replying to you, you need to have seperate replies for each faggot rather than just chain replying like you can here.
It's so cancerous. It makes me not want to comment. It's why most replies to shit are passive aggressive and dismissive. Basically everyone signals that what they're saying is absolute and any replies are meaningless. Twitter is nothing but the sassiest shit flinging. Reddit is horrible because the upvote system is so performative.

>>106167737
>Basically everyone signals that what they're saying is absolute and any replies are meaningless
that's because you tied to an username and you risk losing it if you fall out of line

>>106167772
it's so cancerous how they would use bots to stalk you. i was trying to post on r klingon and was immediately given notice by a main member I was unwelcome lol

It's funny because it's for the best to ditch the slop wagons.

my discovery is significant. it means one site to rule them all really means and in slop spam bind them.

>>106167306
Jesus Christ dude, you really need to start going out for walks. How the fuck 4chan can become the only way you talk to people?

>>106168896
well, how do you work hating ni... i mean what could a fellow have in common with a white genocide slop eater?

>>106169133
Good thing I'm not an Amerigger or Bongoloindian.

>>106169384
those countries don't have effective top secret star wars nuke defense.... ....

take meds

>>106168896
what kind of sociopath talks to strangers on walks? i bet you get threatened a lot

>>106167737
>>106167772
>>106168138
Thank god.you can hide some or all of your post history now lol. Digital archaeologists cam just cope and seethe.

>>106167675
Harder when jannies don't (or are told not to) delete blatant marketing threads.

>>106169433
>33
nice try glowie

>>106169447
cars are such brain warp. historically people chatted / gossipped. it was basic human bahavior

>>106169535
>walk up to stranger on the sidewalk
>try to gossip like friends
you're a fuckin loon

>>106169576
im not him.

people used to not have phones, tv, radio, or newspapers.

life was way better

but you didn't talk across gender usually

>>106167306
Baseded

>>106169653
it literally is sloptube. it's the point. they can't do true ideal videos for all

>>106167438
I think what you're saying is that it pre-calculates its feed.

It's not that the user hits the yt home page and then it figures out what to show you on the fly. It already calculated everything and it was waiting for you to arrive to show you what it had figured out. Imagine a nightly batch job where it pre-calculates a list of suggestions for every user, not saying it does this exactly, but something like that. Now, is this optimisation really a bad thing? Well, it indicates that the "algorithm" isn't necessary very responsive, it needs time to adjust. We could say it's inert to influence from user behaviour. But the user conditioning effect, the Plato's cave where the user always sees the same thing so they develop a preference for what the algorithm shows them, a self-reinforcing effect, that's there whether or not the algorithm updates on a nightly or real-time basis. So, I don't think OP's post really says anything useful or anything we didn't already know. Maybe OP is like a non-responsive algorithm, continually spitting out pre-digested pap and promoting it as if it were interesting.

>>106170029
the point is that it is impossible to serve videos ai KNOWS users want, because it would be too many cold storage videos at once. the reason they push sticky slop is it's cheaper, really more like infinity unaffordable for what you REALLY want.

SELECT top 100 * FROM posts
inner join followed on posts.username = followed.followed_username
where followed.username = "me"
order by timestamp desc

shrimple as that

>>106170110
you need both tables, surely. idk that sql type

we don't know their deep retrieval algo, but remember they did away with hashtags.

why?

i say they couldn't handle so many as were used. each is like an irc chatroom, but where every user can join and insta post

>>106170091
Maybe they should sell all their long tail videos to some other company that could pay for the hosting of all that shit so that memers could trawl through it and guffaw at the irony of it.

>>106170307
they're gonna delete them.