how exactly is it pozzed?

>>106173559 (OP)
Why do you think its pozzed?

>>106173587
most alt tech is

>>106173559 (OP)
It isn't

>>106173749
Much unlike mainstream tech then? What kind of retarded statement is that? I'd even agree if you consider proprietary software and centralized networks/platforms "alt tech", but the real alternative technology, as in free/libre software and decentralized isn't "pozzed". You're being contrarian to an already contrarian position and thus becoming a full normalfag.

>>106173934
mainstream and alt tech are both pozzed
when a non-pozzed alternative pops up (((they))) bombard it with CP until it's down for good, like slimgur was

>>106173559 (OP)
The other day I saw a thread on some tor imageboard with alleged proofs that i2p had been broken by some police. I don't remember what the proofs were, I didn't pay much attention and barely read for I don't plan to use it, but it seems that there are at least rumors about it being "pozzed", yes.

>>106173559 (OP)
can't you run i2p over tor or some other altnet if you're paranoid?

>>106175925
tor lacks udp support

>>106174142
Folks. All of these darknets are fine. Nothing is perfect but they do deliver on their premise.

. Use i2p for live chat and for hosting traditional servers like you would on the clearweb.

. Use Hyphanet for everything else, particularly for it's fully decentralized hosting capabilities and resilience towards censorship/spam on it's message board system.

. Tor's still useful for accessing a residue of clearweb sites that have yet to ban it.

. Glowies will have you freak out over fake news regarding these darknets, hoping you'll continue to allow them to surveil and censor you on their pozzed clearweb slop.

>>106173559 (OP)
you again? you either come back with a site address or fuck off