under the guise of "safety."

that's a quaint concern now that all public code (gpl'd or not) is laundered through LLMs and sold back to you in a subscription service

>>106236376
read the manifesto

>>106236335 (OP)
there are thousands of GPL rust projects out there retard. and MIT is popular currently irrespective of implementation language choice.
maybe you confused rust with bsd lol (as if you're not another tard-maxxed /g/eet)
>>106169388

>>106236335 (OP)
Isn't MIT good?

>>106236335 (OP)
It's so ironic that all those lefty fags choose licenses like MIT or BSD while talking about taxing the rich and similar bullshit.
>NOOOOO... Tax the rich, Bezos it literally Bond villain
>BTW, here mr.Bezos, please use my code for in proprietary software. No, no need to thank me. No, no need to contribute back.

>>106236335 (OP)
Ok you presented the only good part about Rust. What are you complaining about now?

>>106236335 (OP)
I ignore licenses. They have no power over me.

>>106236335 (OP)
MIT will save us from the HIV+Cuck license that is the GPL.

>>106236926
how is GPL cuck license if if does not allow corporations to cuck you, the developer?

>>106236642
yes, aijeets just want to gpl their ai slop so that no one can use it without disclosing the source. mit license is based.

>>106236800
>and I also don't make money with code

>>106236955
little kid is playing with terms he's picking up from others without web searching the meanings, just ignore

>>106239048
i love this triply retarded comment.
implying that:
1 no one "making money" liberally violates licenses.
2 these licenses are strictly enforced/enforceable worldwide.
3 people who "make money" would ask for more gpl licensed code.
congrats /g/eetoid. you just put tard-maxxers to shame.

rust is loved by trannies, mnc's, and the prc

>>106236563
>all popular licenses
I don't see any +NIGGER

>>106236335 (OP)
It's a product/protocol distinction.
MIT/BSD is for protocols which you want EVERYONE to copy. Windows copied network code from FreeBSD - ended being a net gain.
GPL is for products which you want to extract revenue from through dual license agreements.

>>106236335 (OP)
Rust is one of many LLVM-based languages that avoids the GPL. It's a conspiracy by Apple to replace gcc because their lawyers hated Tivoization exception.
For Rust, the solution is gccrs. I don't think it is widely used.

>>106236666
>Ok you presented the only good part about Rust.

Chad detected.