They are so solid they don't need any gay design or designer to improve their business

>>459816
yeah, it is also closer to a global critical infrastructure than a consoomer brand so it does not need a logomark that is legible in google results as a 16px favicon for seo upboats or a social media roundel for ultra low bass phonk tiktok twerk videos.

>>459781 (OP)
id make the wafer gold colored for xtra bling

Have the letters uppercase. Move the disc to the left of them or get rid of it. Make the disc more minimal.

The logo is poor, it works poorly in reductions and it doesn't connect me with "technology", I could easily think it's a world bingo championship

>>459781 (OP)
Logo looks like it was designed in 15 minutes in 1999 by a geek with no design experience. Definitely dated

But like >>459817 said, would a company like this really even need a good logo if they are not appealing to consumers?

>>460195
The hell do you want them to do with a logo, make it another garbage transparent “simplistic” sociopathic mess like all other logos today? No thank you prick

>>460186
>it doesn't connect me with "technology"
It's a wafer, and to anybody familiar with them (tsmc is not a consumer facing company so their customers definitely are), that speaks "technology" audibly.

>>460196
>The hell do you want them to do with a logo
redesign for fun, look at the thread. the board, and fuck off