>>29060645>science denier>from a flat eartherSee
>>29059841You shoot yourself in the foot saying that no matter how much you traverse an linear plane, you don't sink over horizon. Yet repeatedly there's things that DO go over a point of a horizon. What does that tell you? Even IF they disappear from the top down as opposed to bottom up, YOU, mr. ScIeNtIsT, Ought to recognize the scientific method!
Question posited, where do these things go?
Hypothesis, there must be something in the way.
Test, If there's something in the way, we ought to see the object disappear once it reaches a certain point.
Test show EXACTLY THAT!
We replicate the test and the objects KEEP VANISHING!
Conclusion, there's something in the way! THEN we come up with a hypothesis on WHAT THAT THING IS.
Unless there's been a terrible mistake and you are in fact, not a proponent of flatearth, I hope at the very least, others will realize the massive inconsistencies following a flat Earth model. The heliocentric model is a million times better because it explains every natural phenomena with provable science! I mean, these guys can't even explain a day/night cycle