>>29230256
That's normal. I actually have a long history with my older sister, but despite we've done lots of stuff together and still do when possible, I don't fancy my other female family members. There's couple of female cousins with whom we started but after that I have never even fantasized about them.
And it's not about caretaker fetish either. There's plenty of little niche variations, like some like to play the adult baby thing, which I find repulsive. Then there's the "daddy", "mommy" fetish which comes from S&M plays and I find it extremely boring and pointless because that's just another word for "master" or "mistress" and has nothing to do with your father or mother, and then there's those "step family" or "foster family" all the way to "teacher student"-fetishes, which are more into that care taking stuff and doesn't have anything to do with family relations.
The thing is. For you it's a fetish because you don't fancy your real familymembers but yet you like incest porn, which I can tell you, is nothing like how it is real. For me it isn't. And I don't mean that "for me it's real life", because of course that it is, but to me it's also a fantasy and memory (reminder of something what happened a while ago) because of course my fantasies are circling around my sister and our real experiences, but yet, it isn't circling around my mother, despite I'm watching these clips about mothers and wanking to them sometimes. Real incest is really boring because you can't really make incest porn out of it. Porn needs something quick to build the setup and assure you that this is it, while me and my sister have known each other since teens (joke!) and we don't need any setups for anything. If I'm brutally honest, I don't watch these clips seeing "Mom's got nice ass", I just see "Nice ass". One could think that incest have killed my view to see these clips as incest porn and have made them regular porn, if you can understand any of what I tried to say?
