>>29283170 (OP)
>>29283268
These two are an amazing contrast. Each falls on opposite sides of the invisible line of acceptability.
The first ass is plump and round, yet still holds the contours one would expect were he to ask a man to describe an ideal woman's ass. The cheeks are smooth and well-defined; jiggly, yet not gelatinous. Note how it's able to be temporarily deformed but still snaps back to its original, resting position. The overall upside-down "heart" shape, as well as the clear definition between the bottom of the cheek and the top of the thigh puts it firmly on the side of a fairly "nice ass."
While there may be snobs and connoisseurs - those who would prefer the gym bunny or bony, heroin-chic model types - even they can look at that ass and, while it may not be to their taste, they can at least understand why some might appreciate it. Like a Subaru Forrester, it's not for everyone, but it's not hard to see how some find it appealing.
The second ass has many of the same qualities as the first, but it's beyond plump, it's flabby. It's not really round or smooth, but lumpy and unevenly distorted; more gelatinous than just jiggly. There is still fairly clear definition in the lines, which is perhaps its only saving grace, but those bottom borders between the woman's cheeks and her thighs are a mirage. Her cheeks have begun hanging down over the back of her legs. Even when her gentleman caller pulls the cheeks apart with all his might, her asshole is barely visible. Just as water runs downhill, the fat just oozes back to its original shape.
This ass crosses squarely into the "fat ass" fetish category, where only those mesmerized by the repetitious jigaboo music will find this appealing in any way. Even someone who would find the first ass tempting would find very little temptation here.
Unless your some 105lb wigger with a badass barbed wire tattoo on your arm the looks like it would snap from carrying a jug of milk.
