>>29479130
that doesn't look like a vagina. at least not as much as it looks like bad plastic surgery, like what used to be a dick got surgery in an attempt to have a cosmetic-only exterior-only vulva with none of the actual capabilities or wiring internally. trying to turn a dick into an imitation pussy and ending up with neither one. sad.
I have no idea who you're trying to kid or if you're just being pedantic or using the loosest possible interpretation of what "a vagina looks like". by that metric sliced ham looks like a vagina under the right circumstances.
that's not a case of an extremely large clitoris, it's the remnants of a penis. that's not bigoted, it's acknowledging the distinction. "trans women are women" is trying to have your cake and eat it too, the logic doesn't work in reverse. if it wasn't just an empty platitude the qualifier wouldn't be insisted at all times. it's worse even.
it's wanting to be treated the same as women by everyone... but also want respect for being trans because between the two the trans part is the main one. so someone that's basically neither (in terms of life experiences or biologically, that can't menstruate or have children *and never could have,*, who didn't go through puberty as a girl and maybe not at all and - probably the most important - STILL has no idea and will NEVER have any idea what having a 1:1 vulva ACTUALLY feels like ) wants people to believe they're no different from biological women. because *trans* women are women.
I'm sure that sounded like a bigoted trumpy post but nope, I don't have a problem with trans people for anything related to being trans or any sexual or gender related thing, just the entitlement of many of them, how many are given automatic BOTD as if mental illness and choices later regretted are phenomenon that by some law of the universe can never manifest that way, as if gender dysphoria can't be imagined or pretended. only legitimate. pls.
