OP is gaaaaaaaayyyyy.
Much like women, crypto-gays claim they undnerstand our obsession with breast, tits, bosoms, they claim they know they go to our heads... but they don't seem to GET get it, you know?
Lemme put this in clear mathematical terms. I can acknowledge that theoreitcally some tits are objectively better than many/most other tits. That is immaterial.
Any tit in grabbing range is good. A glimpse of an a-sized sideboob makes your day better. If you get to lick annd play with nipples, you're not going to be contemplating how their areolae shape/colour compares.
Boobs are infinitely good, therefore:
Boobs=β
>>29595719 (OP) = β+10!
>>29595753 = β+69*2
>>29595937 = β+69
>>29596061 = β-5 (cuz she's gonna complain aboutt hiking and stairs constantly)
>>29596213 - β +5 (same issue as above, but all wild titties get a +10)
And I've chosen humblest titties I could find, a base β bosom. Not as big as some in this thread, with puffy nipples, but no puffy enough to be a fetish, with darker areolas. Would you or would you not do some dumb shit to play with them?
So while objectively we can rate them, it literally doesn't matter. The outcome of all the above ratings can still be reduced to "β" if they were in our grabbing range.
And then there's positions. Eveyr titty size shines in different position. Huge titties - when she's lying on her back. Medium titties and torpedoes - doggy. Small titties are for cowgirls and dancers.
it's what annoys me about most AI slop. They keep adding humongous titties, where it'd be hotter and better for the illusion if they matched titties to what the person actually has.
All hail the mighty titty!
PS.: with the exception of fox-snout tittes. Them things are unfortunate.
