>>17757373Cool stuff, but doesn’t hold up historically. Christianity began with no power, no state sponsorship, and no mechanism to “bribe” anyone. What’s the bribe? “Join us, and maybe you’ll get crucified upside-down like Peter”? Or torn apart in an amphitheater?
Christians worshipped a crucified criminal and called Him God. In a culture obsessed with strength, honor, and empire, that was absurd. And yet, the faith exploded, across social classes, across regions, even into the aristocracy and army. The appeal wasn’t material, it was moral and spiritual. The Church offered meaning where Rome offered spectacle, healing where the state offered indifference, and eternal life where Caesar offered bread and circuses.
>bribes and corruption Once the Church became entangled with imperial politics, it did struggle with corruption. But betrayal of Christian teaching doesn’t invalidate the teaching—it proves its moral standard. You don’t blame Plato because tyrants misused philosophy. Likewise, you don’t blame Christ because weak men failed Him.
>communismIronic. Communism denies God, denies the soul, and murders millions in the name of equality. Christianity canonizes the poor, preaches forgiveness, and builds hospitals. If you think they're alike, you’re reading Marx, not Matthew.