>be Jewish girl born on June 12, 1929
>spend first decade of your life growing up in a normal middle class Jewish family
>have your world upside down when the Nazi Germany invades your country
>keep a secret diary
>in it, you detail your hopes, dreams, and ever-present and growing fears as the Nazis persecute, brutalize, rob, and ultimately exterminate your people
>you find yourself helpless when the Germans finally come for you too
>be sent to a place called Auschwitz
>die a slow and agonizing death of starvation and disease
>almost your entire bloodline is extinguished, only your father survives and left a broken man
>your diary is eventually found and published, your words now reaching and touching the hearts of millions
>80 years later, horny Southerners lust after you, fantasize incessantly to the thought of you being heavily pregnant, and masturbate to fetish art of you non-stop
>be Rutka Laskier
>pic unrelated

>>17757602 (OP)
The holocaust is fiction

>>17757623
Citation needed.

>>17757602 (OP)
the only girl I ever loved

>>17757602 (OP)
>normal middle class Jewish family
>dad's a banker
>dad would rather, instead of fleeing to some place safe, move to Amsterdam and take over a spice trading company
>your entire family conspires to steal rations from the local ration office and lives comfortably while you bribe officials with fake documents
>germans show up, realize your ID is fake, realize your entire family are illegal immigrants and are stealing war rations
>get deported
>jewish banker dad writes a diary about his little girl masturbating which he thinks is dead
bit odd innit

>>17757637

WAS BORN WITH ROSES IN HER EYES

>>17757645
>dad would rather, instead of fleeing to some place safe, move to Amsterdam and take over a spice trading company

He who controls the spice controls the universe!

>>17757645
Amsterdam WAS the somewhere safe.
>your entire family conspires to steal rations from the local ration office
Please list the lawful method of obtaining food rations as a Jew in occupied Netherlands.
>jewish banker dad writes a diary
Anne wrote the diary. This is beyond doubt to all except the most gullable or the most open of liars.

>>17757674
So jews were stealing people's rations in other countries? with falsified documents? and they wondered why they were deported?

>>17757677
List the lawful methods of obtaining food rations as a Jew in Nazi occupied Netherlands anon.

>>17757681
>list the lawful way a jewish banker would flee from germany, illegally take over a spice business, then illegally steal people's rations so his family could eat better than actual citizens of the city where he illegally resides
uh, get deported?

>>17757688
Let the record show that anon could NOT in fact list the lawful methods of obtaining food rations in Nazi occupied Netherlands.

>>17757690
Oh I know, actually being a citizen of the netherlands

>>17757693
They were legal residents and fully integrated into life in the Netherlands.

>>17757699
>They were legal residents
>family lived in a cupboard with a bunch of other illegals

>>17757688
Let the record also show that Otto Frank founded the spice business himself and this Anon does not have the first idea of what he's arguing about.

>>17757707
What made them "illegal"? And why didnt the Nazis just send em back like Trump?

>>17757707
You think the Franks lived in a secret room prior to the German occupation?

>>17757709
>Otto Frank founded the spice business
no, he moved his family into the spice building and then 4 years later he bought controlling shares in the company with his banker wealth. He owned a different company in germany that he was trying to merge into the company he bought in the netherlands

>>17757729
So he didn't illegally take it over. Thanks for playing!

>>17757733
So you were lying about him setting up the company?

>>17757737
So you were lying about him illegally taking over the spice business?

Notice how stormfaggots have been so utterly BTFO over their claims about Anne Frank not existing or the diary being written in ballpoint pen, that they're not claiming that the Nazis were some kind of pan-European immigration patrol and they dragged her back to Germany due to irregularities in her immigration paperwork and so the German government could feed and house her instead of the Dutch government?

>>17757752
*they're now

>>17757741
No, it was pretty nefarious what he was doing. But you're a moron and probably can't understand simple concepts.
>get hired by company to develop business in netherlands
>become managing director, buy the shares of the other company and move to the building with your family
>have no employees
>put out a couple ads, nothing major
>germans show up
doesn't sound like a legitimate business

>>17757759
>running a business and buying shares in another business
Sounds like absolutely basic capitalism?

>>17757763
no the company doesn't sound like it was real, as if it was a front for something

>>17757771
Why doesn't it sound like it was real anon? Remember, before your answer, reals before feels.

>>17757774
Why was he hired to take over a business with no employees which he purchased the controlling shares for which he then lived in with a bunch of other illegals while stealing rations?

>>17757778
Reals before feels anon. What was it a front for?

>>17757781
>Miep Gies and her husband Jan were also involved in illegal activities like forging ration coupons and helping the Dutch resistance. Some sources suggest that the family's discovery may have been related to an investigation into these illegal activities at the building

>>17757785
>some sources
>suggest

Reals before feels anon. You're claiming Otto Frank set up a spice company and sold spices for years, as a front for someone else's forged ration coupons? You have evidence of this?

>>17757787
Spamming because the franks were running an underground ration scam and possibly funneling supplies to the resistance is exactly what is to be expected from a jew

>>17757789
Let the record show that anon could NOT provide proof that Otto Frank purchased controlling shares in a spice business in 1938 and ran the business successfully until the German invasion and Aryanisation as a front for illegal ration coupons, and that also anon then started screeching about Jews

Reals before feels anon. Reals before feels.

>>17757797
Just accept that the franks weren't innocent

>>17757798
Just provide a single piece of evidence that Otto Frank was not running a legitimate spice business. Reals before feels.

>>17757806
Why was Otto frank directing his like two employees to steal rations with falsified documents

>>17757838
You said he didn't have any employees though? >>17757778 >>17757759

>>17757840
Yeah they don't talk about the two employees he had that he directed to steal rations for resell

>>17757842
So you lied when you said said he didn't have employees?

>>17757846
If the people that lie about anne Frank don't talk about her dad's two employees that stole rations and may have been connected to rebel organizations what do you think that means

>>17757854
YOU said he didn't have employees. You specifically mentioned him not having employees was suspicious.

>>17757861
Is the jidf bot broken? You're not even responding

>>17757877
Why did you repeatedly say Otto Frank's spice business didn't have employees when it apparently did have two employees? Did you lie or are you flying by the seat of your pants and becoming enraged as your ignorance means you get tangled up in your obvious lies?

>>17757885
Because when you Google Otto Frank's business it says he had no employees that actually produced anything

Then when you keep looking, very hard, it's revealed that his two employees were running a fraudulent ration scam and that's probably why anne frank was deported

>>17757894
>Google
Stormfaggots everyone.

>>17757902
>Crying jew
Guess I'm correct by default

>>17757904
>continues to screech about Jews
>brings up crying out of nowhere

Everything OK at home anon? You can tell us, we're all just anons. Get it off your chest?

>>17757908
Yeah it's not like you're obviously Jewish complaining about people pointing out that anne frank was deported because of the greed of her father

>>17757918
>screeching about Jews continues
Ah, so you ARE flying by the seat of your pants and getting tangled in which lie you told a few minutes ago. Got it.

>anne frank was deported because of the greed of her father
Citation needed. Remember, reals before feels.

>>17757925
Why was only anne frank deported and not her father or the people running the ration scam?

>>17757929
>Why was only anne frank deported and not her father
The absolute fucking state.

>>17757932
So Otto frank was found guilty? Of what

>>17757934
>Why was only anne frank deported and not her father
This is you. This is how much you know about Anne and Otto Frank.

>>17757944
So what crime did anne and Otto frank commit to get deported?

>>17757945
That's what I've been asking YOU for 2 hours.

>>17757946
So anne frank did commit a crime and that's why she was deported? Or you just don't know

>>17757950
See >>17757946
You've been outed as a retard and are now at the floundering stage. You'll progress to the shitting up the thread stage soon.

>>17757955
Why can't Jews answer basic questions about their propaganda?

>>17757957
>shitting up the thread with screeching about Jews begins in earnest.

You're the one who has been unable to answer questions what crime they committed. You've been outed as a moron. Take the L.

>>17757965
Wait so they committed a crime but Jews like yourself haven't figured out what it was in 80 years?

>>17757973
Wait so they committed a crime but a Mexican teenager like yourself haven't figured out what it was in 80 years?

>>17757602 (OP)
And now the jews are doing the same in Palestine
The more things change, the more things stay the same.

>>17757977
Why are jidf so infantile and annoying? You realize this isn't a thread about people validating you for being Jewish right

>>17757995
Why are you unable to say what crimes Otto Frank committed, with evidence and without sperging out about Jews?

>>17758004
If Otto frank was deported that means he committed a crime. What crime did he commit jidf? You should know this off the top of your kippah

>>17758008
See >>17757946

>>17758011
Jidf bots are so easy to break

>>17758013
Let the record show that despite being asked 3 (three) times, anon is unable to state what crimes Otto Frank had committed, with evidence of him doing so.

>>17758017
So Otto frank and anne frank were criminals?

>>17758021
You're the one who has repeatedly made that claim but thus far has not provided a single piece of evidence that they actually were.

>>17757602 (OP)
>normal middle class Jewish family
She wouldn't have been persecuted if her parents had renounced the evil Jew religion and become christian. Teaching children that non jews are non human animals which exist to be exploited by jews is worthy of the harshest condemnation.

Ultimately everything bad that happened to her was the fault of her parents who would rather be terrible people than not persecuted.

>>17758028
Why were they deported if they didn't commit a crime? Do you actually not know a single thing that you're talking about jidf? Or are you just pretending to be a mentally retarded slug

>>17758031
>shitting up thread now in full flow

They were deported because they were Jewish. Now, provide evidence they were actually deported for committing crimes.

>Why was only anne frank deported and not her father
>Do you actually not know a single thing that you're talking about jidf?

I actually laughed out loud. Thanks for that.

>>17758038
Wow it only took you 50 posts to post the propaganda talking point that Jews were only deported because of their race so they could be murdered

>>17758040
>doesn't provide evidence they were actually deported for committing crimes

I accept your concession. The rest of this thread is now just anon screeching about Jews even though he's never met one in his filthy disgusting favella.

>>17758047
Okay you can leave the thread now since spamming propaganda that refutes what you have already posted is all that you're capable of jidf

>>17758054
>still no evidence of the crimes Otto Frank supposedly committed

>>17758064
Oh you're still here? Does the jidf pay you to get attention from me?

>>17758080
>still no evidence of the crimes Otto Frank supposedly committed

>>17758085
Remember when your slimy jidf script said it was supposed to be the goyim that had the mental breakdown?

>>17758092
>>still no evidence of the crimes Otto Frank supposedly committed

You DO have evidence, yes?

>>17758094
Hello jidf. How much do you get paid per post

>>17758096
>shitting up the thread continues
Goebbels would be so disappointed in you.

>>17758102
>Jidf thinks you have to be a Nazi to not worship him
That's not kosher

>>17758119
>constantly screeching about Jews
>REALLY interested in Jews who were persecuted by the Nazis in particular

You are transparent. And STILL no evidence of the crimes Otto Frank supposedly committed?

>>17758148
>This guy has to be a Nazi because I'm just an 80 IQ scripted government employee
Have you tried closing the word document and thinking? Oh wait you're paid not to think

>>17758153
>screeching continues
>still no evidence of the crimes Otto Frank supposedly committed

This can all end and you will totally BTFO of me just by saying what crime he committed, with evidence.

>>17758158
You already said not a single Jew that was put into a concentration camp committed a crime jidf. You actively hurt your position just by talking, which is ehy you refuse to actually post any of your own opinions

>>17758161
Then tell the world what crime Otto Frank had committed that resulted in his deportation? You'll BTFO of the Jews and disprove the holocaust and save the white race!

>>17758165
What crime did any of the Jews commit to get deported if not a single Jew committed a crime during WWII according to the jidf?

>>17758171
Let the record show that anon could NOT state what crime Otto Frank had committed, much less provide evidence thereof, at the 7th (?) time of asking.

>>17758173
Did any Jew commit a crime worthy of deportation during WWII?

>>17758175
Did Otto Frank commit a crime? 8th time of asking now.

>>17758187
You already blanket denied Jews possibly being deported for a crime. Even if I showed you the reason he was deported you would deny Germans found him guilty of anything

>>17758193
Then show me the reason he was deported? (Reminder, anon did not know Otto Frank was deported until this thread)

>>17758216
Oh I knew he was deported. I just simplified my formatting because I know you're just a baiting jidf retard. You're very intelligent

Jewish propaganda would work better if you didn't deny things like Germans funding Jews guilty of crimes and then deporting them. Properly formulated propaganda would say the Germans created false charges to deport Jews. But then again there's nothing logical about the Holocaust narrative is there? Almost as if it was mostly made up by illiterate Jews in their shtetels in the 40's

>>17758229
>Oh I knew he was deported
>>17757929
>Why was only anne frank deported and not her father

You are genuinely shit at this and should consider another hobby

>>17758235
Remember when you said nobody was deported into concentration camps for committing a crime?

>>17758240
When did I say that anon?

>>17758241
Oh so most of the people in concentration camps were criminals?

>>17758244
When did I say that anon?

>>17758246
So concentration camps didn't have criminals in them?

>>17758250
When did I say that anon?

>>17758252
The last time you answered a question jidf you said all Jews were deported to be killed, right?

>>17758258
When did I say that anon? You're not flying by the seat of your pants and making things up, AGAIN, are you?

>>17758268
You said the purpose of deporting anne frank was to kill her for being a jew. If that's the case why didn't they kill her jew father who was actually guilty of crimes?

>>17758273
>who was actually guilty of crimes
Evidence?

>>17758276
okay if the sole purpose of deportation is genocide how did otto frank survive the war

>>17757623
True. I'm not convinced.
>s-so now can we be Nazi?!?!?
No.

>>17758278
What crimes did Otto Frank actually commit anon?

>>17758281
Lets just assume every person ever sent to a concentration camp full of criminals was actually innocent of any crimes, even fabricated.

How did otto frank survive WWII? Seems a bit odd. Was he just lucky?

>>17757658
but then they buried her alive

>>17758279
who are you quoting?

>>17758283
What crimes did Otto Frank commit anon?

>>17758281
He murdered Heinz Bock

>>17758294
I don't know the jidf say he was sent to a death factory but refused to die, like a cockroach. Some say otto frank sprouted insect appendages in the gas chambers and climbed to safety away from the gas as he watched anne frank's pregnant belly convulse with his soon to be dead child

>>17758295
Big if true.

>>17758299
You said he had actually committed crimes (>>17758273), so what were those crimes?

>>17758301
No you see the nazis didn't convict anybody of any crimes when they sent people to the punitive labor camps. It was just straight into a gas chamber which otto frank mutated into a human/insect hybrid to escape the gas

What are you retards even arguing over

>>17758308
Ah, I see we have moved into openly shitting up the thread. Got it.

>>17758309
the jidf is having a mental breakdown so he's spamming the thread with nonsense

>>17758312
He says, having claimed Otto Frank committed crimes, but after 100 posts still hasn't said what those crimes are, much less provided evidence.

>>17758314
No you see nobody ever sent to the prison labor camps were criminals, the striped clothes they wore was to protect the SS from jewish magic

>>17758312
>>17758314

This is a thread about Rutka Laskier, not Anne Frank.

Read the OP you dinguses

>>17758316
>still hasn't said what crime Otto Frank supposedly committed

>>17758320
read the filename of my picture

The book's only truly new revelation is the accusation of a new Frank family betrayer. Past theories have abounded, including the new warehouseman, burglars looking for extra money, or suspicious neighbors. According to Lee's theory (and this is not giving anything away, as she voices it in the introduction), ne'er do well Tonny Ahlers did it. Ahlers, an early Nazi informant, actually saved the Franks from the Germans once. He turned over an incriminating letter that accused Otto of anti-German sentiments in 1941. Otto paid off Ahlers twice for giving Otto the letter instead of sending it along to his superiors. Lee believes there was a larger blackmail scheme ongoing and that Ahlers eventually turned in the Franks (and the four others living with them) because he needed the money.
This is reason to believe Frank was a subversive engaging in activity anti-thetical to the flourishing and functioning of the German state.

>>17758339
What does the German state have to do with a spice merchant living in the Netherlands?

>>17758339
Yeah, his two employees working for this supposedly international corporation were busy spending their days fabricating identities in order to scam the local ration depot. Were they sending them to the resistance?

>>17758348
He didn't have any employees, remember?

>>17758353
You're right, he had no legitimate employees at his supposed international cooking resin production company.
>while the exact number of employees is not explicitly stated, it's known that Otto Frank had at least four key employees
wow a former banker running an international company based around producing goods and he has all of FOUR employees

>>17758359
You said he didnt have any employees. Why did you lie?

>>17758360
I didn't think 2-4 employees was even conceivably believable for a supposed international spice and resin production company

>>17758365
You said he didn't have any employees. Why did you lie?

>>17757602 (OP)
When Adi comes marching home again,hurrah, hurrah!

>>17758367
you don't think 2-4 employees is a little low for an ex banker running an international company in the capital of trade in the region?

oh of course you don't you're paid not to think

>>17758373
You said he didn't have any employees at all. Multiple times. Why did you lie?

>>17758376
Are you okay jidf? you're latching onto figures of speech like an esl

here try this אתה לא הגזע הנבחר

>>17758381
>have no employees is a figure of speech

Why did you lie anon? Did you quickly Google it? Therefore revealing you are indeed flying by the seat of your pants?

>>17758385
Yes when you have 2 known employees and both of them are accused of running a ration fraud business that doesn't leave much room for legitimate product production, does it?

>>17758389
You said he didn't have any employees at all. Why did you lie about that? What else are you lying about?

>>17758391
Right google doesn't like to tell you about his two main employees which ran a ration fraud business

>>17758395
So you did Google it? Is that what you are only just now finding out that Otto Frank was deported as well as Anne?

>>17758399
When you google Otto Frank's employees it doesn't immediately give their names despite them probably being in the diary (I've only flipped through it)

You do know that in anne frank's diary she (her dad) admits to defrauding war relief efforts and stealing rations right?

>>17758404
>I've only flipped through it

>>17758406
Right. The narrative is obviously fake so why would I learn who the obviously fictional characters are? The people she was surrounded with were the people doing the ration fraud scheme. It seems more like they were stealing large amounts of food for some unknown motive

>>17758410
>it seems

Reals before feels anon.

>>17758428
Well I'm basically talking to myself since you're a bot so I can't actually expect you to say anything informative

>>17758431
You haven't said anything at all.

>>17757602 (OP)
you forgot holland was letting the RAF use their airspace while being "neutral"

>>17758447
What does that have to do with Anne Frank or Rutka Laskier?

>>17758444
>anne frank writes in her diary about the people she lives with scamming the government out of war rations
>she thinks this is great because they get extra food
>the franks are found out, more than likely because otto frank was buying ration cards off the black market
>for what purpose? some have theorized it was in connection to the resistance

this means that even if you ignore all the speculation, otto frank put his daughters in danger with his activities and got them deported

>>17758464
>more than likely
>speculation

Reals before feels anon. What crime did Otto Frank actually commit?

>>17758470
Otto Frank bought ration cards off of the black market

>>17758331

What if I the my mom though (spoiler: I do)?

>>17758471
Evidence?

>>17758484
>The people who helped hide the Frank family, such as Miep Gies and Bep Voskuijl, were part of Dutch resistance groups that aided those in hiding and provided them with sustenance and support

Oh so otto frank's two main employees were part of the dutch resistance

>>17758490
Evidence? Reals before feels anon.

>>17758498
So otto frank set up a shell company in Amsterdam and let the dutch resistance operate out of it, using his wealth to buy ration cards off of the black market in order to feed the resistance. He gets found out, gets deported, along with his daughters. He presumes his daughters die and we're sold a sob story about how she was gassed or some shit for being jewish.

>>17758463
well gee lets see........if the jews behind roosevelt hadnt been trying to drag all of europe into war then germany would have never needed to invade holland

kino

https://youtu.be/Kerg2rrIdAU?si=0u5FzrkOLMZXcTP5&t=1090

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQGf9paqd7U

>>17758509
Evidence? Reals before feels anon.

>we're sold a sob story about how she was gassed
The absolute fucking STATE.

>>17758529
Do you have evidence to the contrary?

>>17758532
You're making the claim, you provide the evidence

>>17758542
I'm deciphering propaganda, not actual real historical events. If what is claimed actually happened I wouldn't even be able to criticize it. Which is also why you're incapable of posting anything that supports jewish claims

>>17758549
So you have no evidence beyond feels. Got it.

>>17758555
Evidence for something that didn't happen? That's your job jidf

>>17758714
What didn't happen?

>>17758284
With just her sister at her side

>>17758720
Why does jidf reply, does jidf get paid to post stupid shit? Or is jidf just retarded seething monkey

>>17758726
The stormfaggot is now truly mind broken and has fallen into incoherence.

>>17757627
.

>>17758731
You already said that before jidf. Hey jidf, did the Holocaust happen? If I ask you for evidence of the Holocaust you won't post any will you

>>17758279
>implying a Nazi would ask anyone's permission on what to believe

>>17758743
Where did I say that before? Why do you continually lie about absolutely everything?

>>17758751
Hey jidf, did anything actually happen? Will you deny you're jidf?

>>17757713
because literally nobody wanted them

>>17758756
Will you deny you're a seething Mexican who has gone off and got drunk on cheap tequila and you've now completely gone off the rails?

>>17758769
Hey jidf can you say if literally anything ever happened in history

>>17758775
>referee Jews REEEEEEEEE!!!
Compelling.

>>17758778
Hey jidf who was the first Saxon king of England

Inb4 england doesn't exist

>>17758780
Aethelstan, depending on how you define England. Now tell me what crimes Otto Frank committed and your evidence.

>>17758787
by that logic what crimes did the victims of operation keelhaul commit?

>>17758792
>STILL hasn't said what crime Otto Frank committed

>>17758787
But I already told you that you mindbroken retard. You can't pretend to care about history and spam

>>17758799
Where did you tell me what crime Otto Frank had committed and your evidence he had done it?

>>17758794
he was a jew jews declared a holy war

>>17758802
Hey jidf what was the first plane to fly across the Atlantic ocean
>The ocean is a spook created by the Nazis
Oh

>>17758803
>>17758804
We have now reached the incoherent babble stage.

>>17758808
How much do you get paid per post?

>>17758808

>>17758820
>it's not incoherent babble!
>it's incoherent babble based on a single line written by some guy!!!

Compelling. Now tell me what crime Otto Frank had committed and your evidence.

>>17758824
Tell me how much the jidf pays you to post nonsense

>>17758826
>STILL not saying what crime Otto Frank had committed and the evidence to prove it

>>17758831
I already told you jidf. Anne Frank says her father was illegally stealing food with fraudulent ration cards, it's in the book.

Now repeat yourself about something stupid again you dumb kike bot

>>17758824
what crime did the japanese who roosevelt had locked up commit? when your race boasts of getting a war provoked constantly there will come a point youre going to get into the middle of it

>>17758837
Are you suggesting that Anne Frank was a real person and her diary really was written by her?

>>17758848
I don't really care if she's real honestly jidf

>>17758853
You just said she was real and did indeed keep a diary that accurately recorded the events of her life.

>>17758856
And? Why would I care about that jidf

>>17758864
Why would you care about Anne Frank being real, her diary being her own work and an accurate description of her life indeed...

>>17758876
The great thing about propaganda especially low quality propaganda like the Holocaust is that you can assume everything the Jews tell you is true, fill in their own logical pitfalls with your own reason and the narrative still doesn't pan out.

Like I proved this thread with simple googling, Otto frank was helping the Dutch resistance and endangered his daughters. That should be the prologue to Anne Frank's diary. How she was tragically a victim of circumstances her father created, and then was used as propaganda

>>17758888
>Otto Frank was helping the Dutch resistance
Evidence?

>>17758904
It is interesting that nobody points out a banker with inexhaustible wealth didn't save his family and instead stayed behind in German occupied Netherlands to steal rations in Amsterdam

>>17758909
>inexhaustible wealth

Making shit up as you go alone again huh?

>>17758913
Why did the banker with inexhaustible wealth kill his daughters?

>>17758917
So yes, just flat out making stuff up now, got it.

>>17758920
So yes Otto frank killed his daughters instead of saving them

>>17758924
This is more "making stuff up" anon.

Imagine killing your daughters fighting for the resistance and then publishing their diary for profit leaving out as much as you could about how it was you that got them killed

Reminds me of Schindler's list

>>17758937
>still no evidence of any of this

Hey Jew boy I bet you like Schindler huh? Totally not a complete phoney created by post war propaganda

We have passed the shitting up the thread stage and are now into open screeching as the bump limit gets closer.

Hey Jew boy, why do jidf try and claim that communist partisans getting ventilated was the real Holocaust and that gassing didn't happen?

>>17758956
>making shit up

If the camps were death camps why is Otto frank alive jidf? Asked you 150 times this thread

>>17758964
What crime did Otto Frank commit and what is your evidence, asked you 200 times this thread?

If Anne Frank was deported and murdered for being a Jew why wasn't Otto frank shot in the head for stealing rations?

>>17758970
What evidence do you have he was stealing rations?

Why was Otto Frank's only two employees members of the Dutch resistance in Amsterdam?

>>17758978
Why can't you keep track of how many employees Otto Frank didn't have?

Why isn't there a single printed policy of genocide in existence?

>>17758984
You are no longer floundering but are now flat out drowning and struggling to stay afloat.

Why was 60% of Auschwitz's prisoner population actual prisoners while the rest included Jewish laborer volunteers?

Why were there so many Jewish laborer survivors? Why were 60,000 people evacuated from Auschwitz if Auschwitz was a death camp?

Why were prisoners being used in factories by large industries? I thought they were just killing them? Why were these factories creating their own camps to house their forced labor?

>>17758995
>>17759002
>the guy who didn't know that Otto was deported along with Anne is suddenly claiming to be an expert on Auschwitz

Why were the Jews in eastern Europe engaging in communist terror bombings and killing civilians? Why were the sockets? Why did the Jews set the Warsaw ghetto on fire?

Why was the babi yar massacre, the largest actual recorded (exaggerated) murder punishment for terrorist bombings?

>>17757602 (OP)
kike cunny ToT

>>17758758
Okay, but that's not "illegal". That's just you not liking shit.

>>17759126
none is too many

>>17759247
Edgy. CRAAAAAAAAWWWWWLING IIIIIIINNN MY SKIIIIIIIIIIIIIN!!!!

this jew mad as hell lol

>>17757688
Are you retarded, this doesn't even make sense
>he was illegally taking food rations!!!!
>Okay, how should a jew in nazi occupied Netherlands lawfully obtain rations
>Oh yeah sure let me prove how to legally illegally take rations
The fuck is the matter with you

>>17759012
Slave labor is considered by some to be cheaper than paid labor. Also doesn't help that a lot of regular factory workers got conscripted

>>17759501
Well it's pretty odd that Otto Frank was in Amsterdam anyway. It doesn't seem like he was running a legitimate business. He was owner of a company in Germany that then moved to Amsterdam but he had no employees. Nothing to suggest he could afford to rent a place with any real production output to pay for it. The fact that he was stealing rations is bad, especially when he was already receiving rations like everybody else. Even if you ignore the speculation about Otto Frank possibly supplying the resistance with meals or whatever, he was stealing food from the government so that he could horde it with his associates, simply because he was rich and could afford it.

>>17759260
It was official immigration policy regarding jews back in the day

>>17759565
>Well it's pretty odd that Otto Frank was in Amsterdam anyway.
Not really, it's a big city and the Netherlands had a lot of jews both historically and as refugees from across Europe
>It doesn't seem like he was running a legitimate business. He was owner of a company in Germany that then moved to Amsterdam but he had no employees. Nothing to suggest he could afford to rent a place with any real production output to pay for it.
Gut feelings are nice and all but we need some primary sources if we want to prove things
>The fact that he was stealing rations is bad, especially when he was already receiving rations like everybody else.
He was a jew in nazi occupied territory, you think he could walk up to the authorities and ask for rations?
>Even if you ignore the speculation about Otto Frank possibly supplying the resistance with meals or whatever, he was stealing food from the government so that he could horde it with his associates, simply because he was rich and could afford it.
Anon stealing food isn't something you afford to do it's something you do if you can't afford food, considering where he leaved yeah rations weren't exactly doshed out to jews

>>17759591
Jews got rations lol

>>17759601
Yeah I'm sure the rations in their camps were a realistic amount of calories

>>17759615
You know about Jewish ghettos right? All the Jews flocked to the cities. Jews were getting rations. Otherwise there really would have been a genocide

>>17759620
If jews were flocking to cities then why is it so weird for Otto to also flock there

>>17759636
Otto Frank left Germany to flee the Nazis. What does he do in the Netherlands? He hangs out in the middle of Amsterdam while under German occupation for years. Seems odd

>>17759565
>seems
Reals before feels anon
>had no employees
You have been saying he had no employees, 2 employees and/or 4 employees in various orders this entire thread. Did you forget or are you genuinely schizophrenic?

>>17759785
>it's odd for a businessman to run a business, in the capital city of a welcoming neighbouring country, that is also a hub of international trade, especially trade with the far east that is the source of the products his business sells

You didn't even know Otto Frank was deported until yesterday.

>be jewish girl
>get sent to auschwitz
>show your tummy off to SS guards

>>17759041
fagtler lost the war and got raped

>>17757602 (OP)
I don't know anything about Rutka Laskier, but how in the fuck did the Dixies really having sexual fantasies towards Anne Frank?

What's going on in this thread?

>>17757666
My wife..

>>17760508
>but how in the fuck did the Dixies really having sexual fantasies towards Anne Frank?

Why wouldn't we?

>she cute
>she funny
>she's in need of rescuing
>stupid Yankees aren't going to be getting off their butts to save her

>>17761211

Hands off, I saw her first!

>>17760508
>I don't know anything about Rutka Laskier

Only Holocaust victim to have a heavy metal band named in her honor

https://rutkalaskier.bandcamp.com/

>>17759012

gotta keep that war economy chuggin'

>>17760174
>I make a good point
>jewboy chimes in "yeah well (made up bullshit)"
put a shotgun in your mouth and pull the trigger lol

>>17758463

Nothing

>>17758924
My man, all you've done in this thread is repeat /pol/ memes, then when someone asks you for actual evidence you run to google and get everything wrong, then you just gave up and starting talking about jidf.

You must realise what you're doing is pure rhetoric and has no substance, right? Why are you confident about something you know nothing about and can't back up?

>>17762382
>make a good point
>reveal you didn't know absolute basic information about the Franks
>repeatedly lie about how many employees Otto had
>entire argument is just some feels about how he was doing something illegal because...BECAUSE HE JUST WAS OK!!!!
>begins screeching about Jews and JIDF

They're not sending their best.

>>17758741
It's a miracle!

>>17757674
How can Amsterdam be safe when it's occupied by Nazis?

>>17763086
>>make a good point
thanks for the admission of defeat jidf

>>17763419
>expecting Wehraboos to be that intelligent

>>17757602 (OP)

cool story bro

>father invents time machine and travels to the future to buy his daughter a pen made in 1951

Why are Neo-Nazis so obsessed with fruitlessly trying to prove that this girl's diary is a fraud? Would be less pathetic to just take the L honestly.

>>17765011
>pen made in 1951
>diary published as a book in 1947
What did they mean by this?

>>17763445
>stormtranny doesn't know how quoting works

>>17763419
What year did the Franks move to Amsterdam anon?

so was she raped by the nazi camp guards or not?

>Anne Frank writes about being attracted to Peter van Pels and kissing him
>Awwww you're sweet!
>Anne Frank writes about being attracted to an unnamed girl and wanting to kiss her
>Hello, security!?!?

>>17758279
Anyone can be a nazi, because you're powerless and not very smart

>>17757715
They probably went out sometimes to go loan money at high interest rates or spit on christians but other than that pretty much yeah

>>17765161
They repeat the same /pol/slop over and over again because they don't want to think for themselves
Their opinions are not their own; they just repeat stuff because they think that this will cause them to fit in

>>17765215
Why are you like this?

>>17765161
If they can disprove the diary they can destroy a central plank of mainstream popular perception of the holocaust.

They'd be more successful if they actually read the diary and had a basic understanding of the Franks and what happened to them. Alas, as this thread demonstrates...

>>17765280
This thread demonstrates Anne Frank's dad got her killed through his own actions, if she even died at all, nobody actually knows if she died.

The narrative of random arrest and murder using ethnic justification doesn't exist which is the entire purpose of the propaganda

Slowly everyone will beging realizing the same thing, that if the major takes of the Holocaust aren't true, then how are any of the takes true.

>>17765583
What actions?

>>17765590
>Otto Frank's business, where the Franks were in hiding, was involved in illegal activities like ration card fraud and employing workers illegally. This likely drew the attention of the authorities, leading to the discovery of the hidden individuals

>>17757602 (OP)
It would be better for you to say
>have your world upside down when the WRONGDOERS invades your country

>>17765614
Evidence? Remember, reals before feels.

>>17765757
Read the diary. It talks about them stealing

>>17765766
The diary is an authentic document actually written by Anne Frank and accurately describing their experiences?

>>17765776
What does that have to do with Anne Frank saying her dad and friends were thieves

>>17757674
So was it safe, or was it somewhere they couldn't legally obtain rations? It seems like those are mutually exclusive.

>>17765793
Is the diary a real historical document and account description of Anne Frank's life yes or no?

>>17765794
What rationing was in place in the Netherlands prior to the German invasion anon?

>>17765804
Does Anne Frank's diary talk about her father and his friends being thieves?

>>17765825
>can't answer a yes/no question

>>17765915
Did you not read the diary? Anne Frank says her father is a criminal

Is it really just the same two guys arguing in this thread?

>>17765994
Pretty much. It's the braindead jidf poster that calls everyone a Nazi and covers up things like Anne Frank saying her father ran a criminal business

>>17765987
>>17766058
>still can't answer a yes/no question

>>17766064
See the jidf is trying to say that since I'm a Nazi I should deny the diary exists for some reason. He really doesn't like that I've actually read the part in the diary where she said her father was a criminal and that's probably why he was deported.

>>17765260
>>17765161
Bizarre projection.
People like Hitler.
They don’t like jews.
That’s all.

>>17766077
Typical communist trannies talking to themselves about strawmen that they're angry dont work

>>17766067
>STILL can't answer a yes/no question

Is the diary a real historical document, written by Anne Frank herself and an accurate description of her life, yes or no?

>>17766105
Do you think her dad possibly wrote in his own thoughts into his dead daughter's diary?

Do you think it's interesting if that's the case, that he would keep in the part that he was a criminal?

If he didn't edit the diary, why would he keep the part about him being a criminal in the diary?

Is it because he believed the people that would read it would support his criminal activities?

>>17766112
>STILL can't answer a yes/no question
Why are you having trouble doing this very simple thing?

>>17766119
Do I think a book which has a high liklihood of being proapganda is at least in part partially fabricated?

What does that have to do with anne frank admitting her father was a criminal in the diary?

Are you suggesting that the fake part of the diary is the part where otto frank is a criminal and got his family deported?

inb4 hurr durr im a dumb jew

>>17766128
>STILL can't say yes or no

>>17766137
Does anne frank say her father is committing criminal acts in her diary? or is her diary fake? that's a pretty odd position to take as a jewish communist

>>17766144
>STILL can't say yes or no

>>17766148
Why would a jewish communist deny that anne frank says her father is a criminal in her diary and then cope spam for multiple days?

>>17766152
>STILL can't say yes or no

>>17766159
Yes anne frank says her father is a criminal in her diary

you okay with that?

>>17766162
I asked if the diary a real historical document, written by Anne Frank herself and an accurate description of her life, yes or no?

>>17766163
So if I deny the diary is real then all the circumstances in the diary aren't real including where she said her father was a criminal and is just an invention of her father

if I say the diary is real then her father was a criminal and that's why the franks were deported

this looks like a lose lose situation for you jew

>>17766170
>STILL can't answer a yes no question

>>17766173
I don't care if the diary is real because if it's real or not the jewish narrative loses

so do you want to talk about the content of the diary where she says he father is a criminal or are you going to keep spamming

>>17766178
>I don't care if it's real but I still want to talk about it

Why is a yes no answer so difficult for you?

>>17766185
Because the diary being real or not is not an issue because if its real, which is your position as a jewish communist, then the franks were deported for violating the law and not because they were jewish

>>17766190
>the document I'm using as the basis for my main argument being real or not isn't the issue
Stormfaggots everyone. Yes or no?

>>17766193
>jew can't even say if anne frank's diary is real or not anymore
how the table turns

>>17766195
>he says, having been asked a yes no question multiple times and dodged it every time.
Yes or no anon.

>>17766197
Is the diary real or not jew?

>>17766198
That's what I've been asking YOU for the last hour or so. Yes or no?

>>17766205
I don't care if it's real or not jew, obviously you do which is why you're having a mental breakdown over the franks being criminals

>>17766207
>I don't care
>that's why I'm using it as my only piece of evidence
Yes or no anon?

>>17766209
THe subject matter is anne frank's diary, your argument is that he diary isn't real which is why it doesn't say the franks were criminals

typical behaviour from the /his/ communist spammer

>>17766212
>your argument is that he diary isn't real
Where did I say that anon?

>>17766216
So if jews were deproted usually for being criminals, doesn't that kjind of debunk the narrative that jews were sent to death camps because they were jewish? In reality they were just sent to concentration camps for being dangerous subversives

>>17766221
>still not answered either previous question
>now just reeling off ESL babble

Good chat Pablo,see you next thread. Hey, maybe you can do the bit about ballpoint pens thats always fun!

>>17766226
Okay but the franks were deported for being criminals, she says so in her diary. Jews don't tell people this which is why people have come up with wild theories that they were somehow sold out for being jews.

Nigger they were in the middle of amsterdam they were surrounded by jews, the franks were deported for breaking the law.

This means jewish deportations were highly selective and in no way were racially based, this is supported by the large amount of non jewish prisoners in the camps, which outnumbered jews

>put up joke thread expecting it to get 10-20 replies at most before jannies nuke it
>two retards arguing somehow manages to max the 310 replies

Sheesh

>>17766229
>she says so in her diary. Jews don't tell people this
Stormfaggots everyone.

>Nigger they were in the middle of amsterdam they were surrounded by jews,
So all the other Jews in Amsterdam and the Netherlands survived the German occupation unharmed, right?

Migrate to my other threads to continue your shitflinging

>>17759602
>>17760010

>>17766237
Jews are pretty funny if you're trying to pretend every city in the world was emptied of jews

>>17766242
Was Amsterdam emptied of Jews?

>>17766250
The netherlands was the only country with a census that showed who the jews were, that's probably how the franks and their conspirators were discovered as being illegals, because they were even attending school.

Which means the frank case is a case of extremes. Otto Frank moved to Amsterdam and bought a business, illegally smuggled his family there and then put them into public school. After nazi occupation he began buying ration cards off of the black market and distributing the food among his ILLEGAL workers. This illegal workers WORKED FOR DUTCH RESISTANCE.

The fact that Otto frank thought he wasn't endangering his children is absurd.

>>17766268
Was Amsterdam emptied of Jews during the German occupation anon?

>>17766270
I don't know, was it? are you pretending it was?

It would be really easy to debunk the claim that "Amsterdam deported all its Jews". The fact that you're so confident about it means you're citing an actual dubious claim. But I'm confident that claim would be easily falsifiable like all your claims

>>17766277
Then debunk it.

>>17766280
You haven't made a claim yet, jew

>>17766282
Amsterdam deported all it's Jews. There, now debunk it.

>>17766286
>Like in other occupied countries, attempts were made to hide Jews and other wanted people from German authorities
>About 25–30,000 Jews went into hiding as onderduikers (literally “under-divers”)—most famously Anne Frank, who hid with her family in an Amsterdam house from July 1942 for over two years.
>Many non-Jewish Netherlanders helped to hide Jews, often individually in exchange for payment. Two of the most active helpers were Corrie Ten Boom and Henriëtte Pimentel, both of whom were eventually arrested and deported themselves.
>Of the onderduikers, about a third were caught
So the nazis had under 30% efficiency even finding the illegal jews.

debunked, gg ez

>>17766304
And the Dutch Jews who DIDN'T go into hiding?

>>17766311
Show me a dutch jew of anne frank's caliber that was deported, I'm sure there's at least one, right?

>>17766314
>dodges the question, AGAIN
What happened to the other 120,000 or so Dutch Jews anon?

>>17766321
Sorry your claim that "Amsterdam deported all it's Jews" was already debunked, kike. You lost

>>17766334
>only 120,000 out of 150,000 Jews were deported
This is what stormtrannies now consider a win

>>17766336
Sorry your claim that "Amsterdam deported all it's Jews" was already debunked, kike. You lost

>>17766337
Ok Pablo, you win, happy now?

>>17766340
Sorry your claim that "Amsterdam deported all it's Jews" was already debunked, kike. You lost

>>17766341
Oh no, it's broken. Maybe this is why it can't answer a yes no question...

>>17766345
Hey you dumbass kike rat, what's your source for the 120,000 jews deported from amsterdam, just shoot me a link and I'll debunk it

>>17766346
Ok, what was the real number of Jews deported from Amsterdam?

>>17766351
where's the link forehead? did the kike forget how to copy paste?

>>17766352
Why can't you just say what the number of Jews deported from Amsterdam actually was?

>>17766361
I don't know how many jews were deported form amsterdam because all exact amounts of deportations are easily falsifiable since nobody actually knows and it's all just stories

>>17766364
>I don't know
Stormtrannies everyone.

>>17766365
Correct, when a claim is made without evidence you have no way of knowing if that claim is true. Or they might just be lying

>>17766369
Like your claim of Otto Frank being a criminal?

>>17766410
No more like jews like yourself claiming everybody was deported and then the source is some 80 year old woman who admits later she was lying