It has finally been demonstrated that christianity is the only true religion and, above all, that catholicism is the only valid doctrine.
https://youtu.be/BB4YR9R74eg

>>17758296 (OP)
>sectarian Thomist who spergs out about Scotism and Molinism
>can't cope with Eastern saints preaching the essence-energies distinction
You have to be mentally ill to be a Thomist in 2025.

>>17758296 (OP)
>It has finally been demonstrated that christianity is the only true religion and, above all, that catholicism is the only valid doctrine
Everyone already knew that.

>>17757448

How can Romanism be a true church when it preaches a different gospel from the New Testament? How can popery be apostolic when there wasn't even a bishop of Rome until the mid 2nd century?

Total Catholic Victory
Wagner predicted this
(I haven’t watched it)

>>17758296 (OP)
>posting a 10 hour video thinking anyone's gonna watch it
Cathcucks really are that arrogant.

>>17758440
>How can popery be apostolic when there wasn't even a bishop of Rome until the mid 2nd century?
Delusional Prot-Satanic cope

>>17758440
They won't have answer to this

Wheter or not Catholicism is true or not is irrelevant when the real quesrion is whether or not Christianity is true or not.

>>17759043
Snakes can't talk.

>>17758296 (OP)
Seems these Catholic-annihilating images need to be posted again, because they never learn.

>>17759050

>>17759050
>>17759054
>cherrypicked quotes you barely understand
Typical.

>>17759054

>>17759058
I'm not hearing any counter-examples. Typical Catholic "Read the church fathers, prottie! No wait, don't read the parts that prove me wrong! Nooo... that's not allowed!"

>>17759063
I'm not Catholic, you're just too subhuman to even bother dealing with.

>>17759071
No argument, as I thought

>>17759073
I get my information from reading the Church Fathers in their entirety, not just cherrypicked quotes. I checked my PDF of Origen's On Prayer, and sure enough he speaks of the intercessions of saints in Chapter 11.1

>Not only does the High Priest pray alongside those who pray authentically, but those who are in heaven, the angels who "rejoice over sinner who repents more than ninety nine just persons who have no need of repentance" (Luke 15:7), and likewise the souls of the saints who have gone to their rest.

If you think I'm going to bother refuting every single quote taken out of context or post different quotes expressing support for saintly invocation, you are retarded.

>>17758440
>>17758910
Why must you lie? Here's a list of all the first century Popes. I can also list all of the second century ones too if you insist on lying. If you're a Christian I strongly suggest you pray to the Holy Spirit and ask for guidance and let go of your pride.

Pope 01: AD. 30 – AD. 64 - St Peter The Apostle (PETRVS)
Pope 02: AD. 64 – AD. 76 - St Linus (LINVS)
Pope 03: AD. 76 – AD. 88 - St Anacletus (ANACLETVS)
Pope 04: AD. 88 – AD. 97 - St Clement I (CLEMENS)
Pope 05: AD. 97 – AD. 105 - St Evaristus (EVARISTVS)

>>17759054
>>17759099
Like you're too retarded to even realize that Origen in that quote you posted is actually writing in support of saintly invocation and differentiates it from prayer to the pagan gods as practiced by Platonists, since saintly invocation is a request to the saints to pray for you, which they send up to God as incense serving Christ in the sanctuary (Revelation 7:15). I am NOT tracking down every error you've made because just a cursory glance reveals how RETARDED a single misappropriated quote is.

>>17759099
>>17759115
>Not only does the High Priest pray alongside those who pray authentically, but those who are in heaven, the angels who "rejoice over sinner who repents more than ninety nine just persons who have no need of repentance" (Luke 15:7), and likewise the souls of the saints who have gone to their rest.
I'm not seeing any praying to saints here, only that the saints in heaven pray, which we know from the Bible anyway. Your argument is about invocation of the saints, yet you quote Origen not mentioning that, but instead the saints in heaven praying. Where does he say we should pray to the saints

>Durr it's just asking them to pray for us not praying to them
I'm using the exact same lamguage your church does
>We need only ask Saint Joseph for the grace of graces: our conversion.
>Let us now make our prayer to him
https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_letters/documents/papa-francesco-lettera-ap_20201208_patris-corde.html

>>17759103
Early Christians couldn't even decide on who the first few Bishops of Rome were, nor if Peter was even the first bishop of Rome, nor who consecrated the first one (or two) - was it the apostles in general? Or Peter? Or Paul? Or Peter and Paul?

Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.3.3
>Linus (ordained by "the apostles")
>Anacletus
>Clement

Tertullian, De Praescriptione 32
>Clement (ordained by Peter)

Eusebius, Church History 3.2, 3.13, 3.15
>Linus (after the deaths of Paul and Peter, doesn't say who ordained him)
>Anacletus
>Clement

Liberian Cataloge of 354 AD
>Peter (earliest mention of Peter being the first bishop)
>Linus
>Clement
>Cletus

Jerome, De Viris Illustribus 15
>Peter
>[second bishop]
>[third bishop]
>Clement

Jerome mentions an alternate lists used by the 'Romans' i.e. the christians in Rome, which has a different order:
>Peter
>Clement

Apostolic Constitutions 7.4.46
>Linus (ordained by Paul)
>Clement (ordained by Peter)

There's even more sources to add to the Romanist confusion, but these will suffice

>>17758296 (OP)
Awesome! Enjoy Hell.

>>17759050
>>17759054
>>17759059
>>17759063
Keep up the good work!
>>17759058
>TRVD LVRPING
Just rope, buddy.

>>17759103
>PETRVS
>LINVS
>ANACLETVS
>EVARISTVS
I'll never understand how you losers lack the self-awareness to detect the unbelievable cringe inherent in this LVRP. I'm guessing God already must have given you over to strong delusion.

>my religion is true because 9-hour schizopost i found between my gooning session and my ai-generated sermon binging
Yup, that religion's officially dead.

>>17759103
>the magisterium has spoken popery is real!
When you go back and read the apostolic fathers and track down their testimony to this issue there is no evidence of a monarchical episcopate (which is an eastern innovation from around the turn of the second century). The picture one gets from 1 Clement, the Shepherd of Hermas, and Ignatius to the Romans is that the church of Rome at that time had retained the biblical church government of a plurality of elders.

>>17758296 (OP)
>9 hours
Im not watching all that nigga

>>17758296 (OP)
Cool

>>17759382
You can watch one hour per day

>>17759050
>>17759054
>>17759059
Blessed. I will also contribute.

>>17761657

Raped.

>>17761661
Now this citation of Augustine is the same as the one in the idolatry image above, just expanded. I recall reading in Augustine (and I believe it was this very citation) a condemnation of idolatry which was particularly powerful, since he responded to the defense of the pagans which proved their doctrine (which he obviously rejects) is the exact same as that which the Romanists use to justify the worship of images. He also responded to them accusing "you also have your venerators of images", saying "would that we did not have them, and would that we did not go on having them" making him a witness along with Epiphanius that the worship of images first appeared in the Church during the late Roman Empire among ignorant laymen drawn in from paganism by the decrees of the emperors, and that their practice was recognized, condemned and prohibited by the authorities of the Church at that time.

>>17761463
nah

>>17758296 (OP)
Over 9 hours of slop. Incredible.

>>17758296 (OP)
>History proves Papism
It literally doesn’t. Which is why they have fully embraced the cope doctrine.

>>17758323
>You have to be mentally ill to be a Thomist in 2025.
Why? My tradcath bros told me that Thomas Aquinas was gigabased.

>>17758323
Imagine being a gay orthobro protestant to palamite retard thinking he's le based bc he found out protestantism was fake and gay but still inherited his hatred for Rome so he converts to an ethnonationalist Balkan eastern church and larps that he's right, pathetic

>>17758296 (OP)
>be archaeologist
>dig around Sinai for decades
>find literally zero evidence of millions of Israelites wandering for 40 years
>Exodus not even once
>read about Jericho walls falling from trumpet blast
>actually check Jericho
>city was already destroyed centuries before Joshua would’ve arrived
>bible cope intensifies
>open Bible
>David and Solomon had giga-kingdom with gold, palaces, empire vibes
>check archaeological record
>barely find a few huts and broken pottery
>“unified monarchy” my ass
>see Philistines mentioned in Abraham’s time
>they didn’t even exist yet
>bible.exe has stopped working
>global flood with Noah and zoo boat
>geology and archaeology: “nah bro, never happened”
>no flood layers, no mass extinction, no ark debris
>boat story just vibes
>look up ancient records from Egypt, Assyria, Babylon
>expect epic Bible battles and plagues
>records: “who?”
>Bible getting ghosted by history
>dig in Canaan
>expect foreign Israelite invaders
>instead find Canaanites slowly evolving into Israelites
>“conquest of Canaan” was just a rebrand
>analyze Hebrew texts
>turns out most were written centuries after events they describe
>tfw your holy book is historical fanfic

what now? "we just haven't dug deep enough"? Bible bros are always updating the cope.exe :)

>>17764128
next tell us the one again about how the hittite empire didn't exist

>>17764134
There was one, but it was nothing like described in the Bible.
The Bible claims it was a small kingdom equal to Israel, but according to reality it was a massive empire that rivaled Egypt
You’re so desperate to claim that your Jew worship manual isn’t fake that you use the weakest evidence (they mention some other nation once, therefore everything is true)

>>17759071
bro thats like THE non argument

>>17761946
15 seconds per day