What is the historical reason why until the 17th century sub-Saharan Africa was stuck in the Neolithic period without any decent civilization?

>>17761915 (OP)
Not true
They had some sort of medieval/ancient tech level
Not as advanced as the others but still medieval/tech level in some place
Also your obession with phenotype/looks is gay and you obviously cherrypick

>>17761915 (OP)
>Negro section
>Post a melanesian,Cushite, Nilotic

>>17761915 (OP)
Mali.
Zulu.

I wasn't a believer until I learned about all the racial inequalities that exist and continue to exist. There's inequality of everything from crime to wealth to income to education to single motherhood. It's seems obvious to the naked eye that humans are made up of smaller groups of humans. And they are very much veey different form each other. It's like arguing that all dog breeds can be as fast as a greyhound and it's only dog racism that holds them back. It's dumb and it goes against everything we know about reality.

>>17761915 (OP)
They actually independently develope Iron working.

>>17761915 (OP)
I think that different races evolved at different speeds.

>>17763109
What did they accomplish with it?

>>17763117
They made some nice art. Built some monuments.

Neolithic means stone age. Bantu had Iron equipment.
Also afro astatic people originated from Somalia.

>>17761915 (OP)
I will not deny that human races differ but this is a /pol/ thread made in bad faith and it shouldn't belong on /his/
You want to "epicly own them liberals" then post it on Reddit

>>17763114
There was no evolution between Africans and non-Africans. Early humans migrated out of Africa about 100,000 years ago and over the course of multiple migrations over tens of thousands of years. That's not enough time for significant evolutionary divergence to happen