fuck this cunt.

>>17764947 (OP)
This I hate him for paving the way for the famine dodger reagan to take over.

America should have died not prolong the cancer.

>>17764947 (OP)
unironic communist sympathizer

>>17764947 (OP)
Aye,his state department is almost singlehandedly responsible for communist China barring the manchurian handover itself
>Recession in a depression
>Warmongering only outdone by Hitler and Stalin

If one person truly embodied Machiavelli’s Prince, it’s him

>>17765006
Liberals have been communist sympathizers for over a century and everyone just fell asleep and forgot

I guess that’s just part of their long con

>>17764947 (OP)
Seething nazicel. Roosevelt saved Russian civilization from fascist barbarism

>>17765026
>So that it would rot under communist barbarism instead
like how he sold half of Europe for free at yalta to the said communist barbarians

What book can I read to understand what he did?

>>17765032
Yalta was due to Stalin's brilliant negotiation skills

>>17765026
Roosevelt is indeed a Russian hero

>>17765158
and FDR being a commie slut

>>17765179
chud it was FDR's reforms which saved American capitalism. btw do you own capital wealth? or do you live in your cuck barrack and larp for billionaires?

>>17765189
>corporatism/=/corporatism
FDR ruined american capitalism, he was as bad as the fed which he was elected by the actions of.
You and FDR defends Billionaires because they pick and choose who are billionaires and who aren't. This is the natural result of communism.
FAKE and GAY NIGGERS with FAKE and GAY hierarchy
read Mises and Hoppe

>17765199
>Capitalism/=/ Corporatism
apologies nigger, you may tongue my anus

>>17765199
>pick and choose who are billionaires
do you think that billionaire status is awarded in every generation? I guess you think you would be one if it would a meritocracy.

>>17765204
>You believe whole economy wide cycles
yes
and
>you believe if we returned to pre 1913 you could be a billionare
yes, in orders of magnitude of orders of magnitude levels more likely to be a billionare
bonus
>we should also ban IP

>17765208
>you believe if we returned to pre 1913 econ cycles of no significance you could be a billionare
Sorry, you may tongue my anus again

>>17765208
>>17765209
literally brain damaged

>>17765211
>No refutation
Kek you have no idea what your own argument is nigger

>>17764947 (OP)
He saved Capitalism from itself and the Capitalists have never forgiven him for it.

>>17765247
He was a wannabe ceasar with a horrible economic policy.
Capitalism was ruined by his ilk in 1913
The progressives, like the republicans before them, ruined american capitalism with their legal monopolies

>>17765253
>legal monopolies
such as?

>>17765263
>The railroad companies sherman sucked the cock of
>The current "lobby" system
>"Cartelization"
There are also long stories;
>IP and copyright in general
>FDR's hairbrained program of the day
>Central banking
Hell you can actually include central stuff like police, zoning laws and regulations to this

>>17765305
everything you wrote were already present during the second half of the 19th century as this is the natural course of capitalism. more wealth accumulation leads to bigger companies which will eventually dominate the market. it's the laws that follow this trend and not the other way.

>>17765318
Without the state and statists to enforce their monopoly, the monopolies have nothing.
It was sherman who sucked the railroad cock and it was new york which dictated the ferry monopoly

>>17765337
>the monopolies have nothing
expect for their funds, assets and workforce.

>>17765366
>nothing of consequence
As they fail in using them competitively, world didn't sprout out from skyscrapers, skyscrapers sprout out from the world

>>17765373
how are small business' more competitive than large corporations?

>>17764947 (OP)
DICTATOR!!!

>>17765378
>How did the first corpo or state not take over everything
Setting aside how retarded that sounds
>Markets, small business can cater to markets big business can't
>Tech
>Etc
But the real thing on their side is bureaucracy, corpos suffer from same or similar problems to state bureaucracy as they get larger.
As with any organization, power gets as inefficientive as how far it is from action.
Hence why the argument against taxes, you can't expect to be as efficient with someone elses money as they would with their money
Which is why states and corpos always want legal restrictions or monopolies if possible
ie. Why secession is a big no no or why the health sectors prices can vary so wildly
Because they are contrivances to enact monopolistic practices by force as you can't directly enact violent monopolies without losing all credibility

>>17765392
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale

>>17765475
>No refutation
If you're changing the subject to a general accusation that
>Sheer Bulk is better than form
And the implication of
>Le class warfare
Then this devolves into if bureucratized(centrally planned) economies or free market(anarchic price based planning) are better. In which case;
>https://cdn.mises.org/Economic%20Calculation%20in%20the%20Socialist%20Commonwealth_Vol_2_3.pdf
I don't have to quote w*kipedo as
>this is actually free
A bureucrat will always be inferior to a businessman

>>17765032
Reminded me of the Douglas MacArthur from The Battle at Lake Changjin

>>17764947 (OP)
always ironic that the most die hard right wingers that most benefit from FDRs reforms hate him and die hard left wingers that had their hopes crushed by his reforms love him
the new deal took the wind out of the sails of any serious left wing revolutionary movements while also propping up capitalism as it was busy eating itself

>>17765337
without the state to enforce property ownership, the workers would control everything
why do capitalists hate the state so much when its the only thing protecting their privileges?

>>17767098
Commies
>The prole
>The people so low on the rung of society when left to their devices they rape, murder and steal
>Completely incapable of surviving let alone building civilization outside the range of another civilization
>Moat comparable to slaves
Commies cannot into incentives for the same reason they bank on the coaltion of the fringes.
>>17767095
>Shit libs winning is scary capitalism winning actually
> he wasn't subversive or violent enough
This is how you get Pinochet and kill all commies for a few decades retard. All statism is socialism and you bootlickers love FDR because he was the most horrid, worthless statist in american history

The New Deal
Internment of American citizens
admiration for Stalin
Social Security ponzi scheme
Trying to pack the Supreme Court
provoking Japan to attack
prolonging the Great Depression for a decade

Fuck him indeed.

>>17765018
Every Democratic president since the early 1900s has been this way

>>17767129
>The New Deal
Based.
>Internment of American citizens
Based.
>admiration for Stalin
Based.
>Social Security Ponzi scheme
Broken as fuck now, but was a good idea at the time.
>Trying to pack the Supreme Court
Based.
>provoking Japan to attack
Didn’t happen, but it would’ve been based. Cry more nip.
>prolonging the Great Depression for a decade
There are a few grains of truth to this, but it’s mostly bullshit overall.

>>17767273
This is mostly true in that some Democratic Presidents are actually smart enough to circumvent or outright defy judicial authority at times (for better or for worse). Republicans Presidents don't even the balls to do it, let alone the smarts. Nixon tried and chickened out quick. Drumpf just cries about it online before rolling over for them anyway whenever they rule against him. Lincoln is the only one who actually pulled it off.

>>17767444
How exactly did Lincoln defy the Supreme Court? The South had only 49% of the vote and voluntarily resigned their positions within the US government. The Supreme Court couldn't meaningfully rule on the Fugitive Slave Act anymore, as all the victims (Southern property owners) had renounced their US Citizenship. Why should the Supreme Court rule for non-Americans in American courts as if they were Citizens? Non-citizens have no right to Jury trials, and Commander-In-Chief Lincoln had no reason to provide it for them outside of UCMJ.