Why didn't he go down fighting with his beloved countrymen instead of cowering underground like a worm?

>Why didn't he go down fighting with his beloved countrymen
He did

>>17765421
He sent 1000s of able-bodied men and boys into the Soviet meatgrinder while he hid like a pussy.

>>17765421
No, while German men were out fighting as the Soviets were closing in on Berlin, Hitler killed himself in a bunker.

>>17765420 (OP)
Where was Stalin during the battle of Moscow?

>>17765420 (OP)
hitler had been a deteriorating wreck since '42 and totally broken after the july 20 attempt
he wouldn't have lived past '47 in any circumstances
what i dont understand is how for more than a year the capable men in germany fought and died following insane orders issued by literal cripples and schizophrenics
i've heard it said that by the time of the invasion of italy, the allies had scrapped any plans to strike at german leadership because hitler and his insane cabal were actually making worse decisions for germany than any general put in charge after a coup would

Should have sued for peace in late 1943 when victory could no longer be achieved , even with unconditional surrender. That was probably his most faggot decision cause he knew that he and all other NSDAP would be hanged, so he dragged everyone else down with him.

>>17765460
What, was he supposed to go out there with MG42?
lmao demented tranny

>>17765480
This, he was a barely conscious wreck of a man by '45, with blood that was more narcotics than anything else. He may not even have really understood what he was doing when he killed himself.

imagine if the soviets kept him alive and his bussy was pounded repeatedly until he became pregnant.

>>17765488
He was sueing for peace long before the war started.

>>17765548
the audacity of the germans to harp on "jewish doublespeak" then spend a decade breaking every single rule of diplomacy and promise they made is astounding even 80 years later

>>17765420 (OP)
Is everyone ITT just going to assume he killed himself? The alleged remain skeletal remains of Hitler were proven to be from a female:
https://abcnews.go.com/WN/hitler-skull-russian-secret-service-custody/story?id=9288287

>>17765420 (OP) He didn't love his people. Isn't it obvious?

>>17765620
the only dumb thing about that was anyone believing the russians had hitlers body just because they said so
in a city of rubble with thousands of corpses even a group of children could hide a body where it would never be found
yet the soviets supposedly find hilters body in small hole open just a few meters from the bunker, like come on guys

>>17765620
clitler was AFAB biologically female who identified as a man

>>17765548
Dumb niggers like you always love parroting this like anyone will ever take it seriously. Hang yourself.

>clitler was AFAB biologically female who identified as a man

>>17765548
To "sue for peace" means that you accept negative consequences in exchange for peace.

>>17765646
it's true whether you like it or not

>>17765557
>>17765646
They gave y’all Wi-Fi bomb shelters?

>>17765667
He didnt 'sue for peace'. He wanted others to legitimize his conquest through the use of force.

>>17765656
Germany was very (maybe too) reasonable on the Danzig/corridor question which Britain starter a world war over so.

>>17765681
If they were reasonable then they would have resolved it through diplomacy and not the use of force.
They also wouldnt have attacked a British/French ally so indiscrimantely if they actually cared about and honored the rule of law.

100.000 Poles were dead, cities bombed, and more of Poland than just Danzig was annexed by Germany, and it wasnt just going to be pretended like nothing happened just because Hitler says so. A reasonable peace offer would be to reverse what actually caused the war, instead of offering to keep what triggered the war.
Hitler demanded recognition, not peace.

>>17765704
Just stop replying. You won't get anywhere with faggot neo-Nazis who will just deny reality out of spite.

>>17765704
I’m talking about before september 1939 obviously when basically every avenue was explored but sadly diplomacy is a two way street.

>>17765548
"Just stop fighting back and let me take everything I want" is not suing for peace, you must have fewer brain-cells than eyeballs.

>>17765721
"Raagh! Give me your country in its entirety! OR I WAR YOU!!!!!!" is not diplomacy. See above for how many braincells you must have.

>>17765721
>when basically every avenue was explored
Was it really?
I can think of a hundred different diplomatic options that could have been explored, but they were never tried or tested before the Germans resorted to war.
The question will also be as to why there was so much urgency to claim Danzig specifically in 1939? And my argument would be that 1939 simply was a bad time to pursue further territorial demands since the German governmnet was perfectly aware that German troops seizing Prague caused an outrage in the west. 1939 would be the opportunity to lay low, let the alarmists in the west cool off, otherwise you're only proving the warhawks correct when you pursue further conquest with zero regard to foreign relations.

So;
Did Hitler try to pursue Danzig through the LoN? Why didnt he at least try rejoin it for that purpose? isnt it preferable to war?
Did Hitler try use a mediator neutral third party? Did he try to call for a conference? Did he try to propose a joint administration and economic zone as a starter to further negotiations? Did he make any offers at all or was Danzig more a demand rather than a negotiation? A negotiation relies on the fact that there is an offer.
Did Hitler propose any concessions? Did he offer any guarantees to Poland? Why not offer a non-aggression pact, since it was Hitler who voided the Polish-German Non-aggression pact earlier.
Did he offer a population exchange with the Polish minority in Germany and the German minority in Poland, similar to the successful population exchange done by Greece and Turkey in 1920, which avoided a war.
Did he propose any custom union or joint benefits or joint administration as a starter.

Did Hitler even consider the fact that negotiations can resume under a different government? This is was states ordinarily do. The Greek - Macedonian negotiation lasted for 30 years before it was resolved when both Macedonia and Greece had a different government, thus war was avoided.

>>17765765
And my final note will be that virtually ANYTHING should be a preferable option to war, a war that is also at great risk of becoming a world war, because the west MIGHT actually honor their treaty. That's too great of a risk to take.

>>17765489
It'd be more of a heroic death than killing himself like a coward.

>>17765748
>>17765765
How is Danzig a 95% German city (>muh population exchange) and a rail and roadway across the Polish corridor to connect East Prussia with Germany proper worth starting a world war over? Especially when this area isn’t nowhere close to the quarter of the world Britain had conquered at that point, certainly not by “diplomatic” means >muh league of Nations.

>>17765913
What country are you from? How much of it would you be happy to give away to an (apparently psychotic) warmonger, who hates you, in order to secure 'peace'?

>>17765919
What a facile analogy. It’s more like me getting a neighbouring territory handed to me that obviously doesn’t belong to me and then getting surprised when said neighbour gets back on their feet and comes back to restore what’s theirs. It (Versailles diktat) should’ve never happened in the first place. And Germany still had the constraint to only negotiate on Danzig not the whole corridor and not even raising issues like Elsaz lotherringen or the belgium/debmark landgrabs. Hence me saying maybe Germany was too reasonable in the face of the irrational warhawks you mentioned yourself.

>>17765944
So you just have no connection to reality, and somehow also an ego swollen enough to be at risk of collapsing under its own weight. That sounds genuinely horrific, I'm glad I'm not that fucked in the head.

>>17765675
Thought terminating cliche detected

>>17765913
>Why is defending my ally worth starting a war over?
The world wonders...

>>17765944
>It (Versailles diktat) should’ve never happened in the first place

Shouldnt have lost the war then.
Treat of Frankfurt in 1870 and Brest-Litovsk in 1918 were diktats as well but the Germans were fine with any treaty when they won a war.
Not to mention, the way they treated Poland in 1795, they can thank their lucky star that their failed abdikated revolution-strucked state in 1918 did not recieve the same treatment.

>>17765913
>How is Danzig a 95% German city (>muh population exchange) and a rail and roadway across the Polish corridor to connect East Prussia with Germany proper worth starting a world war over?

Because in the previous negotiation with the previous state, the Germans took more than they had bargained for.
And with the invasion of Poland, the Germans proved that they would stop at nothing because every treaty was treated as a piece of paper, and every negoation would only end on their terms, and that force would be an alternative in every negotation.

The Germans entertained the idea that a war in Europe isnt a big a deal.
The truth is, a war in Europe has always been a big deal. It was then, it still is today.
Why do you think European states dont attack each others, and when they do, it nearly becomes a world war. Had there not been for the existance of nuclear weapons, the Ukraine war would likely have been a world war, because Britain and France and Germany would have intervened.

All Hitler had to do, was to do anything BUT using military force to get what he wanted. The argument will forever bounce back to this fundemental reality. He had neither the argument nor the urgency to being forced to commit to war in 1939.

>>17765950
>>17765955
>ad hominems
>>17765958
Why give a (world..) war guarantee in the first place? To a country you share no borders or interests with?
>>17765965
>Muh polithuania partition
>>Ignores how they participated on czechoslovakia dissolution and puts all blame squarely on appeasing Germany
>Muh Brest livovtsk and Frankfurt treaties
>>Ignores me saying most lost territories and colonies (the ones Britain actually cared about) were never taken back and Germany only looking eastwards

>>17765979
Love how you admit that Britain would’ve turned this ukro-russian squabble into another world war had they still been an empire.

>>17766012
>had they still been an empire
Why do they need an empire?
A war between NATO and Russia would by all means be regarded as ww3.
And we have strong reason to believe France, Britain and Germany would have intervened in the Ukraine war, if it wasnt for the existence of nuclear weapons. We can make that conclusion based on various actions and rhetoric and desires, especially from Macron, but also from other NATO memberstate leaders.

Make that of what you will, but it's a fundemental fact that a war in Europe is a big deal, it always has been a big deal, and it always will be a big deal.

>>17765465
Funny no one has replied to this

>>17765996
>Ignores how they participated on czechoslovakia dissolution and puts all blame squarely on appeasing Germany
Nope it's not ignored.
It's just not as relevant as Germany seizing the entire Czech state for themselves after intense negotiations which were based on the premise that Germany only sought Sudetenland from the Czechs, and nothing else.
The Czechoslovak state would never have collapsed if it wasnt for the Munich agreement, so you should be able to see with some clarity how the western powers almost felt guilty that Prague ended up being controlled in German hands, instead of allowing the Czechs to fight for their country when they had the ability to do so.
Chamberlain was absolutely scorned by his management of Czechoslovakia, which made him take radical actions, even if with hindsight it could have been handled differently. The main point is that the Germans were moving quickly and gave little room for assessing the situation.

>Ignores me saying most lost territories and colonies (the ones Britain actually cared about) were never taken back and Germany only looking eastwards
It was more relevant to the fact that you seethe that losing a war has the consequence of a treaty, something the Germans themselves used with great liberty whenever they were on the winning side.

>>17765996
>>ad hominems
Niggers tongue your anus.

>>17765420 (OP)
>>17765423
>>17765460
>daily Hitler slander thread
Reminder, Hitler was an avatar of Odin.
Hitler fought ZOG for decades.
Hitler was already a soldier who fought for Germany, a patriot who fought in the streets, and a conquering King who lead a crusade against ZOG and Bolshevism.
>but people died in le war
And Hitler denied the enemy their humiliation of his mind and body before trial or ritual.

Poland got smaller than Germany.
The Vatnig Empire collapsed and has African level AIDs.
America is disintegrating with browns and blacks in open revolt stabbing American children in the streets.
Since this thread began 15 British girls were raped/molested by brown subhumans.

Israel is reviled the world over.
Jews have been exposed as hysterical, lying, treacherous, subhumans who drag Whites into war.
Organized jewry has been exposed.
The left has spiraled into weird race/tranny/thirdie obsession.
You lost.
>erm here’s an 80 year old edited photo of Berlin o algo
You lost.
Whites still exist.
Germans still exist.
Hitler’s legendary status only ascends.

>>17765557
Such as?
>>17765677
He offered to roll back all of the “conquests”.
>legitimize
Poland was legitimized.
Lithuania too. So was the USSR.
Why is it only anti-ZOG countries are punished?

>>17766096
>He offered to roll back all of the “conquests”.
Can you explain this in greater detail, seeing how it's a pretty major point.

>>17766034
>Any war “in europe” is a big deal!
>>Escalates said war into a world war
>>17766078
Keep projecting
>>17766048
Where do moralfags like you get the gall to point fingers at czechia a small helpless neighbour becoming a German procterate while you don’t bat an eye on conquering 1/4 of the world (Britain) or basically having an entire continent for yourself (France). It wouldn’t have to do with the fact that those latter folks happen to be browner, gutmensch? And your treaty babble is a non argument, because why write up something so harsh if you’re not gonna be able to enforce it? It’s asking to shoot yourself in the foot at some point.

>>17765704
They tried diplomacy for a decade.
Israel gave Iran 60 days and then struck them the hour the deadline was up.
Shut the fuck up about diplomacy you literally don’t know how foreign policy is conducted.
>indiscriminately
Germany asked for a ceasefire and peace conference over Danzig before Britain and France even entered the war.
Britain declined on behalf of Poland and entered the war within hours.
>pretend like nothing happened
The first call for peace was after the first day when casualties did not even exceed 1000 people on both sides.
>recognition
Danzig recognized as German is worth France becoming Africa, England getting raped to death? And Europeans becoming enslaved to spiteful dysgenic and wicked desert sorcerers?

>>17766103
you do realise that Hitler would have 'Aktion T4'd you, immediately after meeting you, don't you? Why not follow his example?

Because he was a coward who knew his regimen was down, knew there wouldn't be a victory by his side and knew that if he was catched he would suffer a worse fate than Mussolini. He would've been tortured till his bones crack, and what I think mattered the most to him was the "honour" and image he emitted to his fellow followers. If he was caught, he would be severly humiliated, which I think is what he feared the most. After all, what he left is a big strain of malice and fear in humanity's history. Maybe he was thinking that he will rather kill himself in a bunker where nobody will see would keep his "authoritarian image" rather than somebody killing him and capturing that moment.

>>17765765
The Germans made multiple offers to Poland over Danzig and the corridor, they asked for roads, rails, offering to build them themselves, they offered total polish oversight and tolls of all German infrastructure linking Germany and East Prussia, Poland was told not to negotiate by England.
How is this not England deliberately scuttling diplomacy?
You know what we see today? Jews scuttling diplomacy between the U.S. and Iran in the exact same way.
>why was there urgency
Does it matter? Urgency for war was specifically because poland had mobilized their army, signed an alliance with France which had drafted a pre-emptive strike on Germany (everyone recognizes this as legitimate cassus belli as it was used Friday last week btw), and was moving soldiers into Danzig.
>seizing Prague
Prague was never seized.
Show me Germany’s declaration of war on Czechoslovakia, show me the battle in which the Germans took Prague.
Where was the battle? Where was the war?
Nowhere! They were invited in by Hacha because the day before Hacha left for Berlin the Hungarians invaded and Slovaks revolted.
>why didn’t Hitler appeal to the people who wanted to destroy Germany to restore Germany

Why can’t Hitler just conduct foreign policy in Eastern Europe without Britain or France scuttling diplomacy?
Britains behavior was completely antithetical to Anglo Saxon honor historically.
>inb4 imperial examples where jews ran the empire
Prove me wrong by posting pre-1700s examples of this retard level foreign policy from England.
Judge a tree by its fruits.
Britain and France no longer exist.

>>17765780
He died like Roman nobility.
The cowards are Slavs who vulturize his legend as conquerors yet become terrified and hysterical at the thought of his return.

>>17766103
Yep, Europe at the time was vehemently racist and there was a major difference in colonizing African tribes than there was colonizing Europeans. It's a simple fact and I am not going to try to defend Britain on that point.
The problem with you, and every other nazi-chud, is that this debate is extremely personal to you, so you believe that everyone who takes Britains side in this debate must be fundementally pro-Britain in any discussion.
I understand Britain rationale and actions in 1939 and I see it as far more logical and reasonable than Germanys rationale and actions.

It's a pragmatic truth that colonial conquest was far less sensitive than European conquest because a rival European hegemony is far more threatening to Britain and France.
But it's a non-argument for the Germans to make claims on land just because someone else did something 100 years ago. China cannot justify an invasion and annexation of Taiwan based on the idea that USA took land from the indians. The international community would never subscribe to such argument for offensive wars of annexations.
Germany herself was deeply involved in the colonial game, it was Germny who hosted the Berlin conference i nthe 19th century where colonisation was planned and prepared.

>And your treaty babble is a non argument, because why write up something so harsh if you’re not gonna be able to enforce it?
Would you have a less problem with Versailles if Germany was invaded in the 1935 when they breached the treaty by militarizing?
Germany doesnt get to decide when the treaty stops being in effect, Britain and France does. And Britain was extremely lenient towards Germany which practically allowed their recovery, not becuas Hitler had big bad balls.

>>17766118
>GIB ME YUR COUNTRY!
>no
>GIB ME YUR COUNTRY!
>no
>GIB ME YUR COUNTRY!
>no
This is literally all that Nazi diplomacy amounted to. Also, why do you rail against the UK in your post there? For all of the 'Perfidious Albion' memes you retards are responsible for you also seem to hold Britain at fault for honouring its treaty obligations to Poland as far as it could in contempt too. It's almost like you have no fucking idea what you think, and just want to hate everything in the universe - including yourself.

>>17765420 (OP)
>holier than thou idealist calls someone worm
Get some self awareness.

>>17765919
I would give away zero percent of my country, which Poland was able to do with Hitler because Danzig wasn’t apart of Poland. It was a free city, an independence country, whose protection was overseen by Poland with stipulations.
Poland WANTED to get ride of Danzig as early as 1936. Britain and France made it a stipulation of their relationship with Poland that Poland MUST keep Danzig away from Germany.

>>17765423
Don't pretend that you have balls.

>>17766104
>Israel gave Iran 60 days and then struck them the hour the deadline was up.
Israel has been trying negotiate an end to Irans nuclear power for the past 20 years.
This war is also related to the fact that Israel was attacked by Iranian subjects in Gaza, Yemen and Lebanon.

Not that I want to get tangled up in a Palestine-Israel debate, but its a poor example of Hitler attacking Poland as soon as hes told no.

>>17766035
>>17765465
In Moscow. He didn't run away like a coward.

>>17766133
why couldn't danzig be an independent country why couldn't austria or sudetenland? why did shitler have to annex everybody on earth?

>>17765489
Yes you retarded cuck

>>17766133
>Dumb, subhuman, neo-nazi butthurt levels are off the charts captain!
>We cannae hold 'em cap'n! I'm givin' the shields all she's got!

>>17765965
>victors justice
I presume you are fine with the holocaust and general plan ost then yes? If those Jews and Slavs didn’t want to die they should have fought harder.
There was nothing wrong with what Hitler did. If they didn’t like it they should have fought harder to prevent it entirely.

But you don’t hold this view.
You harbor ethnic animosity towards Germany and so apply this “might makes right” mentality to Germany and Germany alone to excuse your own subhuman behavior.
Poland should never have been a state in the first place. It also wasn’t Poland in 1795, that Poland-Lithuania and ruled by Lithuanians.
They also had slavery.
Do you believe slave states should exist?
No you don’t but you will apply a special standard here because of your bias against Germany.
Polish-Lithuanian nobility retained much of their holdings, unlike German nobility which was punished alongside their state.
You only believe in collective punishment when it’s done against someone you don’t like. When it’s done against poles or jews you screech “WHAT DID THAT LITTLE GIRL DO HUH?!” but when it’s Germans “heh shouldn’t have been born on the wrong side of the Oder”
You are an evil person and you are being destroyed because you are evil.

>>17765420 (OP)
He did? He chose to die in Berlin when his advisors were telling him to flee to Prague

>>17766154
>muh localhost
I don't care and unlike you i don't have problems with basic math and logic.

>>17766118
>They were invited in by Hacha because the day before Hacha left for Berlin the Hungarians invaded and Slovaks revolted.

Why would Hacha (or any state leader) sign their country away in just a couple of hours after having the documents presented to them?
It's quite a major decision is it not? Maybe he should have taken the documents back for consultation with his parlament, his cabinet, lawyers? Why the urgency?

Urgency because Poland had taken zalozie in the previous year? Urgency because Hungary threatened a different country?

>Prague was never seized.
Nah the Germans just set up a German office that had complete authority over the Czech state, nationalized the Czech industry, confiscated their gold reserve, making their economy subservient to the Germans, closed their parlament, closed their universities, absorbed the Czech armament into the Wehrmacht, had Gestapo taking control of the Czech society, began German educational programs, intergrated Czech production and labour to Germany during the war.

>Urgency for war was specifically because poland had mobilized their army
Poland initiated a general mobilized their army 24 hours before the planned German invasion was executed. They waited to the last minute because Britain pressured them not to provoke Germany.

>>17766133
Poles are far more responsible for the Danzig crisis than Brits or Frenchies

>>17766146
>leftist calls someone dumb and subhuman
Literal projection.

>>17766154
>You harbor ethnic animosity towards Germany and so apply this “might makes right” mentality to Germany and Germany alone

LMAO whats with the assumptions? I dont hold those views at all, in fact I share these views with almost every war in history.
The jews were a poor example tho since that's not a war, its a genocide.
Not that I am very invested in a debate on the holocaust, I generally dont really care if you say it didnt happen.

>Poland should never have been a state in the first place.
Not for Hitler to decide.

>You only believe in collective punishment when it’s done against someone you don’t like.
lol no. Ágain, whats with the assumption? Why are you making this so personal. I agree with Britains position in this SPECIFIC historical debate, that doesnt mean I take Britains side in every single historical conflict.
Stop being a fucking woman by arguing from your emotions.

>>17765979
>Germans took more
Nope. Hitler actually turned down parts of Moravia.
>Germans wouldn’t stop
They never began.
>every treaty
Name them.
We have been over this before.
Kellog Briad was violated by the Cordon Sanitare.
Versailles was violated by Britain and France not even remotely demilitarizing.
Munich was never broken, Britain just didn’t like that Hacha asked Hitler to stabilize Czechoslovakia.
We have been over this, you have no answers here. Your go-to is “well it wasn’t in the spirit of Munich” whatever the fuck that means.
The treaty wasn’t violated, not technically, not literally, not at all.
It wasn’t violated. “But the spirit” there is no spirit of Munich. The treaty wasn’t violated.
You have run out of reasons for British involvement, it was the jews.
>NOOOO THEY WERENT IN ELECTED OFFICE
Tony Blair holds no office yet is the most influential figure in the UK. Where he lead the ENTIRE parliament follows.
I notice you always fold when confronted with the Blair conundrum because it completely vindicates the view jews held significant power over British politics; seats in parliament neither needed nor wanted.
>war has always been a big deal
British interventionism is a very recent phenomena. Countless more wars in Europe have been fought without Britain than with Britain.
Where was the British intervention when Lithuania invaded French Memelland?
When Poland invaded Zaolzie?
Poland invading Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania?
France invading the Ruhr?
>all Hitler had to do was let us Roadblock him perpetually
Why? Because you’ll condemn your girls to be raped to death as you become a totalitarian shithole if he doesn’t? Well now Germans laugh at you from government subsidized housing while British males get stabbed on the streets as their daughters are raped by shitskins.
Well played.

But I doubt you’re British or you’d admit Hitler was indeed right, his prediction came true.

>>17766034
>a big deal
So why not de-escalate?
Why didn’t Britain de-escalate?
Why did ONLY escalate?
Escalation is the opposite of what people who are against war do.

>>17765420 (OP)
Cause he was smart. He knew his ghost would come back one day to finish the job.

In order to do that, he could not allow himself to be paraded around and humiliated by the allies as a prize dog. Now the spirit of Hitler is stronger than ever.

>>17766102
The Sweden deal offered a full withdrawal of German troops back into Germany and the re-establishment of Poland as a state, this was the starting point for the negotiations. Britain wouldn’t even hear Germany out, let alone negotiate Germany to something more favorable like that + war reparations.
Britain wouldn’t even make clear their stance for peace. It went from Britain declining Hitler asking Poland for peace on behalf of Poland to Unconditional total surrender of Germany with nothing in between.
This deathmatch mentality did not exist in British foreign policy until the glorious revolution when the ban on jews in England was rescinded.

>>17766187
Oh believe me my amerimutt chud, I would be happy to engage in another 300 page discussion with you over this exact same topic for the 5000 time, but I got other plans for tonight, so I'm gonna have to leave you hanging for now.

>>17766129
Danzig isn’t your country.
Nazi diplomacy was Hitler offering trade deals and special infrastructure projects Poland would go to war FOR today.
>hold Britain at fault for honoring
They completely abandoned the Poles to the Soviets. There was never any honor in the treaty to begin with. It was drawn up exclusively to make Poland a fall guy under the clear and present knowledge British support to Poland in any capacity would be impossible.

>>17766135
>give up your defenses to so we can bomb you with impunity
This isn’t diplomacy LOL.

It’s not a poor example. It’s an ideal example because Israel, a serious country, did not mince words or time and retained a shield of “self defense” on the world stage. Yet Germany is seen as an aggressor despite war being their absolute last resort when Britain wouldn’t allow Poland to negotiate on their own.
Why the fuck is Britain even telling Poland what they can and can not do?
France was the same way but they’re ignored because they were trampled in 50 days.

>>17766140
Danzig Sudete and Austria wanted to join Germany.
Why shouldn’t they be allowed to?
I can see objections but, given hindsight, was it worth it?
For me, an American, NO!
I’d trade every Slav in existence if it meant we could have defeated ZOG 80 years ago.

These people are worthless animals anyway. Compare America to the USSR. Slavs have contributed nothing to humanity and Germans contributed Greatly to the United States.
Unfortunate Slavs had to be the victims of ZOG. My people are today the golems who die on behalf of ZOG.
Let us not lie to ourselves.
Hitler was right. Slavs were unfortunate collateral.

>>17766175
>AnYoNe WhO dIsAgReEs WiTh Me Is ''''''''MuH LeFt WaNg''''''''
Is their any brain left in your skull to wash at this point?

>>17766213
>Israel, a serious country, did not mince words or time and retained a shield of “self defense” on the world stage.

Lol Israel has been on an intense propaganda campaign to make the world see their perspective and legitimize their actions in Gaza and Lebanon as an effort of self-defence against the october 7 attack. The skirmishes with Iran are directly related to these events.

>>17766167
>why would Hacha
He was invaded.
>maybe he should have waited for more of his country to be lost
???
You don’t understand how a revolt and invasion can give a sense of urgency and desperation?
>Zaolzie
Literally was not mentioned in that post LOL.
>Hungary threatened a different country
HHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
WHERE DID THE CZECHS RECOGNIZE THE SLOVAK REVOLT SHOW ME THE DOCUMENT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA
>seizing Prague is when you restore German investments to serve German investors
Nope. Prague wasn’t seized.
Also “industry” isn’t Prague.
Gold isn’t Prague.
Prague is Prague.
It wasn’t seized.
Britain told Poland not aggress against Germany (this would instantly collapse the narrative of the polish victim before the British public) they never told Poland to get along with Germany.
Poland aggressors anyway but it’s suppressed because it wasn’t a stunning sweeping maneuver it was Polish muscling their way into Danzig.

Poland began mobilizing in mid summer but was told to slow down so as not to give the appearance they were resorting to war over diplomacy.
They did their final mobilization just before the invasion.
But then beginning to mobilize before the Germans betrays their intentions.

>>17766224
>American talking about zog
Actually kill yourself. You’re probably literally a kike.

>>17766224
>Austria wanted to join Germany.
We actually dont know this since the German army entered Austria specifically to prevent a referendum on the question whether Austria should merge with Germany.

The Germans then held their own referendum once they took control, in the same style they had held elections after NSDAP took power.

>>17766244
Anon, your meds are running low.

>>17766199
>The Sweden deal
What Sweden deal?
This seems like a major point, why are you so vague?

>>17765489
Suicide by Soviet soldier seems more heroic and having better PR value actually.

>>17766140
>sudetenland

Unlike the other two it never wanted to be it's own country dipshit.

It's entire purpose of breaking away from CzechoSlovakia was to join Germany, there was never an independent Sudeten state or ideology.

>>17766125
You mean like bitches such as Nero, lol.

>>17766353
proof? neonutszi incel chud

>>17765460
This never happened

>>17765421
Correct
>>17766604
Schizo

>>17766747
>Schizo
why do you deny the sudetens their self determination nazoid?

>>17766139
But a cowards who wet his pant

>>17765420 (OP)
He had Parkinsons. He could have fled the city and made it pretty far, he might've even done that, it was what Bormann did.