says the larpagan
>u Christiancuck r wrong ok? the killing of white people in and of itself, for some reason, does not deserve the same lament IF it is seen in a religious aesthetic ok? hur dUrhowever, larpagan illiteracy shows itself incredible when the Romans did exactly the same thing that the Christians did according to the pagan narrative.. since religion *WAS NOT SEPARATE FROM THE STATE*, and according to Roman military success (killing white farmers) was attributed to a combination of personal virtus AND divine will. (Lack of virtus, religious neglect or the growth of superstition were seen as causes of divine wrath) military success was considered a sign of a special relationship with the gods, especially Capitoline Jupiter. the victorious generals dressed as Jupiter and laid the laurels of their victory at the feet of the god's statue, symbolizing the connection between military power and divine approval, after killing innocent whites for not following a militaristic state and refusing to worship their native gods
since religion in ancient Rome was supposed to be followed by both the people of Rome and those under their rule, otherwise punishment
sources: Livor Beard et al., Vol. 1
you have two options see here
>>17766912paganism was never "for white people" in contrast to Abrahamism
End of the thread.