Anonymous
6/16/2025, 1:42:03 AM No.17767147
>People have been mocking Christians for 1800+ years
Amazing.
Amazing.
Replies:
Thread 17767147 - /his/ [Archived: 1093 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 1:43:03 AM No.17767149
what does it mean?
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 1:56:45 AM No.17767181
>>17767147 (OP)
Ironically, this mocking caricature is one of the strongest pieces of evidence for Jesus existing and for the credibility of the Gospels
Ironically, this mocking caricature is one of the strongest pieces of evidence for Jesus existing and for the credibility of the Gospels
Replies:
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 1:58:01 AM No.17767183
>>17767181
by that logic, all the christian writings against paganism are proof paganism was real
by that logic, all the christian writings against paganism are proof paganism was real
Replies:
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 1:58:01 AM No.17767184
>>17767147 (OP)
>omniscient
>doesn't know his Adam and Eve were deceived by a snake he must have created
>first fails to find them in the garden and begs them to come out
>then asks them what happened
>then the benevolent god curses their entire bloodlines forevermore for the sin of being tricked by a snake he put in a garden with them
Its easy to mock.
Most people who mock it, grew up in it or around it. That's why its their chosen punching bag.
>omniscient
>doesn't know his Adam and Eve were deceived by a snake he must have created
>first fails to find them in the garden and begs them to come out
>then asks them what happened
>then the benevolent god curses their entire bloodlines forevermore for the sin of being tricked by a snake he put in a garden with them
Its easy to mock.
Most people who mock it, grew up in it or around it. That's why its their chosen punching bag.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 1:59:06 AM No.17767192
Replies:
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 2:00:58 AM No.17767193
>>17767192
dont know about the first one. OP's reads 'Alexmenos worships his god', and depicts a guy worshiping a crucified donkey man, presumably jesus given the associations that pagans made between the jew god and donkeys
dont know about the first one. OP's reads 'Alexmenos worships his god', and depicts a guy worshiping a crucified donkey man, presumably jesus given the associations that pagans made between the jew god and donkeys
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 11:00:37 AM No.17767947
>>17767183
What a retarded take, dumbass. The fact that a contemporary Roman made a mocking graffiti about Jesus proves that Jesus did in fact exist and be crucified. This disproves all of the dumbass atheists claiming "Jesus never existed."
As Jesus did indeed exist, that means his disciples did also exist, who would then begin to spread the Gospel even under the threat of being killed, which 11 out of 12 were indeed killed. While it does not prove exactly that he is the Son of God, it gives him more legitimacy as a real historical figure.
What a retarded take, dumbass. The fact that a contemporary Roman made a mocking graffiti about Jesus proves that Jesus did in fact exist and be crucified. This disproves all of the dumbass atheists claiming "Jesus never existed."
As Jesus did indeed exist, that means his disciples did also exist, who would then begin to spread the Gospel even under the threat of being killed, which 11 out of 12 were indeed killed. While it does not prove exactly that he is the Son of God, it gives him more legitimacy as a real historical figure.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 11:12:39 AM No.17767958
Replies:
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 11:17:05 AM No.17767966
>>17767958
it's greek, you literal NIGGEUR
it's greek, you literal NIGGEUR
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 11:21:29 AM No.17767973
>>17767147 (OP)
no one has explained to me why the graffito is in greek and not latin
no one has explained to me why the graffito is in greek and not latin
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 11:22:03 AM No.17767974
>>17767947
>The fact that a contemporary Roman made a mocking graffiti about Jesus proves that Jesus did in fact exist and be crucified. This disproves all of the dumbass atheists claiming "Jesus never existed."
So wrong, just like Christianity. That graffiti is not contemporary and even if it was it only proved that christcucks believed something, not that what they believed is true. In fact the real historical evidence points to the fact that a historical Jesus didn't exist and that some Christians believed Jesus was an angelic being crucified in heaven. You're too stupid and too dishonest to accept the truth though because you're Christian.
>As Jesus did indeed exist, that means his disciples did also exist, who would then begin to spread the Gospel even under the threat of being killed, which 11 out of 12 were indeed killed. While it does not prove exactly that he is the Son of God, it gives him more legitimacy as a real historical figure.
These are a bunch of non sequiturs. There is a reason why scholars disagree with Christianity on so many levels and even the popular masses do it. Only apologists and theologians still take Christianity seriously, and this to some degree since they are partly liberal in their interpretations.
>The fact that a contemporary Roman made a mocking graffiti about Jesus proves that Jesus did in fact exist and be crucified. This disproves all of the dumbass atheists claiming "Jesus never existed."
So wrong, just like Christianity. That graffiti is not contemporary and even if it was it only proved that christcucks believed something, not that what they believed is true. In fact the real historical evidence points to the fact that a historical Jesus didn't exist and that some Christians believed Jesus was an angelic being crucified in heaven. You're too stupid and too dishonest to accept the truth though because you're Christian.
>As Jesus did indeed exist, that means his disciples did also exist, who would then begin to spread the Gospel even under the threat of being killed, which 11 out of 12 were indeed killed. While it does not prove exactly that he is the Son of God, it gives him more legitimacy as a real historical figure.
These are a bunch of non sequiturs. There is a reason why scholars disagree with Christianity on so many levels and even the popular masses do it. Only apologists and theologians still take Christianity seriously, and this to some degree since they are partly liberal in their interpretations.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 11:24:42 AM No.17767978
>>17767947
>What a retarded take, dumbass. The fact that a contemporary Roman made a mocking graffiti about Jesus proves that Jesus did in fact exist and be crucified. This disproves all of the dumbass atheists claiming "Jesus never existed."
It's fascinating how little Christcucks know about their religion's history. It would be two hundred and fifty years after Jesus of Nazareth's supposed death before any significant numbers of Greeks and Latins would convert.
>What a retarded take, dumbass. The fact that a contemporary Roman made a mocking graffiti about Jesus proves that Jesus did in fact exist and be crucified. This disproves all of the dumbass atheists claiming "Jesus never existed."
It's fascinating how little Christcucks know about their religion's history. It would be two hundred and fifty years after Jesus of Nazareth's supposed death before any significant numbers of Greeks and Latins would convert.
Big Bongus
!!9zfcclmmPlH
6/16/2025, 11:37:00 AM No.17767997
>>17767181
I think the Abrahamic religions are real, I just side with Lucifer
I think the Abrahamic religions are real, I just side with Lucifer
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 5:04:52 PM No.17768415
Who actually denies that Jesus existed? Majority of historians agree there was a man named Jesus who was crucified by the order of Pontius Pilate. That's all they can agree on. Only the most fringe atheist potheads like Bill Mahergo, "Hurrr, it's inconclusive dat he wuz real". No, even secular historians go, "Yes, he was real".
Every other detail about his life is what is debated upon, including the existence of some of his disciples, whether he actually spent over a month in the desert, the location of his tomb, etc. Obviously, the miracles too, but I'm speaking about the non-divine elements of his life. There are many people who think the teachings were made up by a group and then attributed to Jesus in order to create a holy figure. Some people believe this theory has weight because it was Jewish custom to use scapegoats, so creating a mythical figure and having him sacrificed is not out of the ream of possibility.
The only thing that 99% of people can agree on for sure is that there was man who was leader of the Christians and Pilate did order him to die on a cross.
Every other detail about his life is what is debated upon, including the existence of some of his disciples, whether he actually spent over a month in the desert, the location of his tomb, etc. Obviously, the miracles too, but I'm speaking about the non-divine elements of his life. There are many people who think the teachings were made up by a group and then attributed to Jesus in order to create a holy figure. Some people believe this theory has weight because it was Jewish custom to use scapegoats, so creating a mythical figure and having him sacrificed is not out of the ream of possibility.
The only thing that 99% of people can agree on for sure is that there was man who was leader of the Christians and Pilate did order him to die on a cross.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 5:14:30 PM No.17768425
>>17767947
Nope
It only proves your cultists believe jesus existed. I doubt that kid ever met rabbi yeshua
Nope
It only proves your cultists believe jesus existed. I doubt that kid ever met rabbi yeshua