>Chinks have slanty eyes because muh sand
Who comes up with this crap? China and Mongolia are not that sandy, meanwhile actual sandy regions like the Sahara, Arabia and Central Asia do not have this feature. What actually causes this? (Human evolution is history btw)

>>17769048 (OP)
>central asia
They are half east eurasian/mongoloid but yeah its not because of the sand
The reason why chinks look like this is because of neotony/low t and flat faces/maxillas

>>17769052
Central asians/turkics are the original hapas. Hapas are often genetically close to groups like Nogais

>>17769052
>low t
Last I looked at this, I read that, counter to what I would have thought, Asians if anything have higher t levels. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20668046/) Interestingly, I also found that blacks have higher estrogen levels (https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/92/7/2519/2598282)
>neotony
This seems more interesting. I've noticed that Asians look more child like in general. I don't see exactly how that is related to monolid and slanty eyes, although I can believe there is some connection there.
>flat faces/maxillas
Certainly I've noticed that Asian chins are much flatter. I guess you are saying the whole face is flatter. Still, why would this be and why would it result in Asian eyes? I guess, if the face is too flat, The eyelids have nowhere to go?

>>17769176
They are low t and they have feminine traits with weak bodies/athleticism/muscle production
>have more estrogen
Doesnt matter if they are higher t

>>17769190
>They are low t
Source for this claim?
>Doesnt matter if they are higher t
Blacks aren't higher t though if you read the study.

>>17769199
It shows
They dont have masculine facial traits, have bad muscle production and athletecism
Also this is one single study

>>17769215
>It shows
That does not mean that have low t specifically. For example perhaps testosterone is simply less effective in Asians to begin with. Also aside from this I don't see exactly how it relates to slanted eyes and epicanthal folds.

>>17769052
>>17769190
>>17769215
Whitetroon cope. Whites are the most pussywhipped and effeminate race.

>>17769176
Negroids and Mongoloids are probably polar opposites, one with flat maximalism and the other with pronagtism. That's why caucasoids are the more attractive race. Non-caucasoids races need pseudo-caucasoids blood or traits to be attractive. That's why Central Asians are more attractive than pure chinks or Ethiopians more attractive than Bantu niggers.

>>17769236
Proto-caucasoid
>fixes

>>17769231
Central Asians and siberians are hapas and Mongolians have more Aryan blood than Russians have Mongolian blood.

>>17769249
>Aryan blood
Asian rapebabies

>>17769172
>Nogais
My favorite horde!

>>17769048 (OP)
It's just random, like how different races have different face shapes. If a trait is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage, it becomes pure chance whether it becomes dominant or not. Sometimes beauty standards adjust to it, so if the beauty standard randomly becomes "slanty eyes" in east asia, it becomes even more dominant there.

>>17769231
The average Russian could kill ten jeets at once

>>17769281
This is developing a new trait entirely though, not continuing the proliferation of existing ones.
>so if the beauty standard randomly becomes "slanty eyes" in east asia
Are you stupid? You think slanty AND monolid eyes "randomly" became a sexual advantage accross multiple East Asian cultures? Universal or near universal traits in a group only develop through selection.

>>17769048 (OP)
Protection against snow blindness. Inuit goggles have the same shape.

>>17769226
Because slanted eyes/epicanthus are feminine/neotonous traits
>>17769236
They kinda look similar apart from the maxilla, hair type and coloration
>>17769231
Cope

>>17769231
Black males have the highest amount of estrogen of all males

I hate anthropology so much its unreal

>>17769332
>Because slanted eyes/epicanthus are feminine/neotonous traits
Source? And why don't other race women have it? Are eg. Indian women more manly than Asian males?

>>17769316
How come nords don't have it while SEAmonkeys do then?

>>17769332
>apart from the maxilla, hair type and coloration
It's like saying that humans and chimpanzees look similar and that only thousands of years of evolution separate them.

>>17769391
Its made up garbage. it has nothing to do with snow.
Capoids of Central Africa have it and they perhaps havent seen snow in 450,000 years.

>>17769391
>How come nords don't have it
They do.

>>17769385
They do sometimes
>>17769421
Asians and blacks look very similar
Shave an asian and black head and swap coloration, they would look similar
Caucasoids have like an unique shape face compared to them

>>17769476
Only two of your examples of the same old spam have epicanthic folds.

>>17769476
Look bong as fuck. Northern Europeans are the purest western Eurasians although dilates and seethes.

>>17769529
>purest western eurasian
>while looking like this
No

>>17769532
Pass in England (huwhites)

>>17769525
Epicanthic fold doesn't mean monolids. All of them have epicanthus.

>>17769536
That aspect isn't exclusive to Scandinavia; it's common to see bongs like this. They're still the purest Western Eurasian.

>>17769544
That dude is 1/8 black
>>17769529
Look black/mongoloid

>>17769544
The most likely explanation for the mong phenotype is that it's a cold adaptation, so it doesn't have much to do with being West/East Eurasian. Papuans and Australians don't look anything like East Asians. They even have some pseudo-caucasoid traits.

>>17769476
>>17769536
>>17769566
Explain Capoids now

>>17769592
Sexual selection for neotony

>>17769592
It's probably to avoid sun glare as well. Those Africans with slanty eyes are always found in arid/desertic regions with a lot of sun and no shade from trees. The tropical ones don't have it.

>>17769628
Hmmm
>>17769598
This seems to imply all races would have it then

>>17769660
No cause not every race did that far
Its funny you say this cause its the exact inverse for natives in americas
Natives in desert have pseudo caucasoid traits while natives in jungle look like chinks

>>17769048 (OP)
>sand
kek what?
I thought it was about protection against the sun or some shit?

>>17769048 (OP)
A lot of scandinavians have those slanty asiatic eyes too, what caused it? Like so many of them look straight up hapa

>>17769768
The only pseudo-caucasoid Amerindians are Appalachians, which has a similar climate to most of Europe. The ones near Mexico don't look much different from jungle natives, who are more negroid-like in appearance. And the most Asian looking ones are Eskimos/Inuits obviously.

>>17769476
>>17769536
>>17769814
Actually, I would think that they are mongold rapebabies, but eastern slavs are actual rapebabies and they don't really have it. Then again I haven't looked into that so much.

>>17769385
>Are eg. Indian woman more manly than Asian males?
Asian women are more manly than Indian males.

>>17770153
No you have to be extremely gay and low t to say this
There is a reason a lot of people love asian girls

>>17770521
Asian women are stronger than indian males

>>17770753
I dont give a fuck about indians
Why do you seem to hate them

>>17770877
Hate is a strong word
I was just saying

>>17771029
Literally true tho
I dont the hate npc bandwagon that indians get
It was like chinks 30 years ago

>>17771033
Chill out bhai no need to get upset

>>17771033
>>17771167
OP here. I hate Indians just to clarify. I just used them as an example

>>17769476
For me, it's Tilda Winberg.

invading this stupid thread to ask a more important question. how much roughly would the modern dollar equivalent of one bushel of grain during the han dynasty be?

>>17769376
This is 4chan anthropology. Actual anthrapology doesn't deal with this crap

>>17769592
Bonobo hybrids. The other blacks are chimp hybrids

>>17769814
Huns